woodrat
Ensign
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2004
- Messages
- 949
Re: Disgraceful activity. update!
Dogsdad:<br /><br />When I first jumped into dockside chat a few weeks back in another politically loaded thread, it was CONSERVATIVES who insisted that if I was not for George Bush, then I must be for kerry and that there was no other place to be. That is polarization. It was conservatives way back when old Newt was around that started talking about waging a "culture war" on those who disagreed with their politics. It was this president, supposedly a conservative, who threw out that famous "you're either with us or you're against us" line. More polarization. I assume that those of you on this forum making noises about waging a civil war are conservatives. I also assume that your post here is a response to my last post, so once again you are calling me a liberal and a socialist because I don't support this president. This is after I spent many many posts a while back establishing my credentials as a regular old american with politcal beliefs that spanned both sides of the spectrum. Who's doing the polarizing here?<br /><br />As far as the end justifying the means goes, that seems to pretty much sum up the Bush adminsitration's policy towards everything.<br /><br />And what is all this about civil war, anyway?
Dogsdad:<br /><br />When I first jumped into dockside chat a few weeks back in another politically loaded thread, it was CONSERVATIVES who insisted that if I was not for George Bush, then I must be for kerry and that there was no other place to be. That is polarization. It was conservatives way back when old Newt was around that started talking about waging a "culture war" on those who disagreed with their politics. It was this president, supposedly a conservative, who threw out that famous "you're either with us or you're against us" line. More polarization. I assume that those of you on this forum making noises about waging a civil war are conservatives. I also assume that your post here is a response to my last post, so once again you are calling me a liberal and a socialist because I don't support this president. This is after I spent many many posts a while back establishing my credentials as a regular old american with politcal beliefs that spanned both sides of the spectrum. Who's doing the polarizing here?<br /><br />As far as the end justifying the means goes, that seems to pretty much sum up the Bush adminsitration's policy towards everything.<br /><br />And what is all this about civil war, anyway?