WalleyeSniper
Petty Officer 2nd Class
- Joined
- May 15, 2018
- Messages
- 108
Fhttps://forums.iboats.com/forum/boat-repair-and-restoration/boat-restoration-building-and-hull-repair/8464424-rehab-sportcraft-222-1983-deep-v-hull-cuddy-walkaround..inzee
the studs they have minimal structural value compared to ply. Alot easier but whatever you choose it's your boat.
Oh, yeah, I'm definitely using marine ply for all the stringers (unless sourcing, wait times, or some other unseen issue gets in the way. But that's unlikely, as we already have a few sheets of 3/4" and 1/2" already now).
When I was saying "debating using a 2x4" I was just saying that the current dimensions are around 2" wide by 4" tall, like an actual 2x4 was used, for at least 4 out of my 6 stringers. So, I'm not sure if I should still follow that schematic and keep them at the same dimensions 2"wide and 4" tall (using marine ply of course)... Or, if I should just make them as tall as I can all the way up to the sole/deck in every position possible, except for the fish boxes?
(My fish boxes are on each side of the deck and directly above the two outside stringers. Those are 2 of the 6 stringers that are 2x4 size, and then the two inner stringers with engine beds on top of them are also 2x4 size).
It's weird because only TWO of the stringers are actually up to deck height. Looking at a cross section of my boat, the 6 stringers are setup like this:
| |
| |
| | | | | |
I just wasn't sure if there was some unknown design reason for this being setup that way by the factory? Or, it was just done to save time and costs while still being "boat-able" for the average user and I am just overthinking it/second guessing the design importance for no reason, lol.