First of all, thank you for the compliment, if it really was one(can't be sure since educated was spelled wrong). I can't pick a side because as an American I can't possibly side with any of our enemies, but as a human being I can see why we are targeted the way we are. Most Americans seem to forget that just like us, other people, even our enemies, are human. We all love, we all hate, and we all desire vengeance. The same thing that drives us drives them. We are slowly, but surely destroying the Middle Eastern way of life, a way of life they've known for thousands of years. It might be a good thing, it might not, but who are we to decide?Originally posted by mikeandronda:<br /> Ah the WWJD question......hmmmm he wouldnt do what we are, no as a matter of fact if he was in charge of the situation it would suely be different...........One of the hardest questions I have had to ask myself is how to turn the other cheek.....well I fall short of the glory of God everyday.When Christ is running things it will be a perfect world. As for you having no side cuz both are wrong.....you seem to be a smart edjecated man so I find it hard to swallow that you cant pick a side or come up with your own side. It seems to me its a defense mechinism so to avoid attacks on you.
Now imagine that same image over Iraq with over 30 times as many people.....kinda puts things into perspective. We've killed over 30 times as many people that were from a country that didn't even attack us, yet they're the terrorists.Originally posted by 12Footer:<br />![]()
"IF" it's true that there was no threat from Saddam, that could ONLY be because he was constantly pinned down by the US and British forces stationed in the Middle East ever since Gulf War #1... Those forces based in Saudi Arabia...and isn't THAT what OBL claims to be what triggered his war against America ? "Infidels in the Holy Land" ?<br /><br />To appease OBL (perish the thought), the USA and Britain would have needed to withdraw from the Middle East...freeing up Saddam to continue genocide, WMDs, overrunning other countries...you name it, not to mention all the other nightmare scenarios and other hotspots.Originally posted by mrbscott19:<br /> This was was never about liberating the Iraqi people. It was about the grave threat Saddam posed to the US. Turns out that great threat wasn't there. Liberating Iraq is the administration trying to justify why we went in if there weren't any WMD's instead of GW having to apologize for being wrong to declare war on an imminent threat that wasn't there.
What??? 90% of them innocent???????? <br /><br />Where did you get this information?<br />If you look at the real information, not the made up stuff, you will see much different numbers. But I guess they don't agree with what you want them to agree with.<br />The suicide bombers killed 37 children while trying to kill our soldiers, who are trying to make it safe for the mothers and children to live without the fear of being raped, murdered, or tortured. But I guess that was part of the count against us wasn't it????<br />I will keep my main thoughts to myself. If you open your eyes and look at ALL the information, you will see that we were justified and no 90% of that 100K were not "innocents"!<br /><br />AK ChappyOriginally posted by mrbscott19:<br /> Oh thats right, it's called collateral damage when the US does it. Terrorists have not even come close to killing 100,000 people in their many, many years in the profession. But we kill that many people in under 2 years, 90% innocent, and it's not terrorism.
mrbscott19, now it sounds like you agree with having the constant ongoing military presence in the Middle East...and that is exactly what is antagonising OBL and his terrorists (or so they say). You can't have it both ways.<br /><br />I'm sure I once read that President Bush Snr said that it would not be right for him (as a past president) to make any public comment about any of the decisions or issues of his son's administration. This was around the time of "W"'s election - before 9/11 and of course the Iraq liberation.Originally posted by mrbscott19:<br /> That is exact Kiwi. We and Britain are the reason why Saddam didn't have anything. But Bush Sr. also knew the ramifications of removing Saddam from power. Read his book. He knew what would happen. Thats why he didn't do it. And if you haven't noticed, Bush Sr. has never once praised the decisions his son has made in regards to Iraq. That in itself speaks volumes to me.
I want America to prevail. Call me crazy, but for some reason, it just appeals to me.Originally posted by Rudderman:<br /> Yes I agree that it is the USA foreign policy which enrages much of the rest of the world, and not any particular one person or president.<br />The hatred stems from the policies and the attitudes taken by the government in the past, and I am afraid to say, in the PRESENT. They are acting on your behalf so it makes sense that the government's attitudes and values are the same as it's citizens.<br /> <br />Your government needs to take a reality check....your foreign policy sucks, your arrogance is just plain bad manners, you're not the best country in the world, you can't force "freedom" on everyone, you have no right to interfere in other countries, they should be allowed to sort out their own problems. Ok you got bombed at 9/11. Why not get the guy who did it instead of going on the rampage all over the world, turning this whole thing into a war against muslims....Talk about a bull in a china shop!!
I've already stated that we can't up and leave the Middle East, it would be worse for the US than any terrorist attack. Think about it. There is alot of Middle Eastern money wrapped up in our economy. As soon as we pulled out, alot of that money would probably disappear from the US economy, not to mention gas would be $10 a gallon. This country would dive into a depression so great it would make the great depression look meager. That is why this war will go on forever. We can't afford to leave the Middle East anymore, we are too dependent on them.Originally posted by 62_Kiwi:<br />mrbscott19, now it sounds like you agree with having the constant ongoing military presence in the Middle East...and that is exactly what is antagonising OBL and his terrorists (or so they say). You can't have it both ways.<br /><br />I'm sure I once read that President Bush Snr said that it would not be right for him (as a past president) to make any public comment about any of the decisions or issues of his son's administration. This was around the time of "W"'s election - before 9/11 and of course the Iraq liberation.Originally posted by mrbscott19:<br /> That is exact Kiwi. We and Britain are the reason why Saddam didn't have anything. But Bush Sr. also knew the ramifications of removing Saddam from power. Read his book. He knew what would happen. Thats why he didn't do it. And if you haven't noticed, Bush Sr. has never once praised the decisions his son has made in regards to Iraq. That in itself speaks volumes to me.
I agree with what you just said - and not only would it bring down the American economy but also the economies of the entire western world - my own country included.<br /><br />But don't you think Saddam was one of the main causes of instability in the Middle East? Would you really have been better off leaving him in power - with his threats and seething hatred for all things American - without knowing what capabilities he's hiding or gaining...in the middle of a war on terrorism, where your own country has been proven vulnerable to these awful attacks on it's civilian population ?<br /><br />The Middle East is not an easy problem to solve (now there's a kiwi understatement), but at least your current president has been proactive and has made significant progress (and don't forget Libya). Years of talking and diplomacy by others have achieved nothing.Originally posted by mrbscott19:<br /><br />I've already stated that we can't up and leave the Middle East, it would be worse for the US than any terrorist attack. Think about it. There is alot of Middle Eastern money wrapped up in our economy. As soon as we pulled out, alot of that money would probably disappear from the US economy, not to mention gas would be $10 a gallon. This country would dive into a depression so great it would make the great depression look meager. That is why this war will go on forever. We can't afford to leave the Middle East anymore, we are too dependent on them.<br />