Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

joewithaboat

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Jul 3, 2011
Messages
1,172
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

I love the blue more and more each time you post pictures of it.

Great score on the manifolds!

Can't wait for the splash! :)

Oh, and that's the port side. ;)
 

greg82255

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
781
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

I love the blue more and more each time you post pictures of it.

Great score on the manifolds!

Can't wait for the splash! :)

Oh, and that's the port side. ;)

Oops, you're right. That is port side. ;) Not quite sure why I said starboard. I should be able to finish everything up tomorrow. I've never installed a drive - hoping it won't be too much of a pain to get on there.
 

joewithaboat

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Jul 3, 2011
Messages
1,172
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

Oops, you're right. That is port side. ;) Not quite sure why I said starboard. I should be able to finish everything up tomorrow. I've never installed a drive - hoping it won't be too much of a pain to get on there.

Here is a couple well done video's that Chris put up...

Check alignment: http://youtu.be/w118LGsYgY4

Install drive: http://youtu.be/aGVrY4cWiDA
 

joewithaboat

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Jul 3, 2011
Messages
1,172
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

I will take another look at the hull this evenung. I didn't see anything that was significantly impressive the 1st time. Weight seemed on par with many "value" boats, and deadrise and other specs looked in the norm. Are you familiar with that hull? What did I miss?

If his starting numbers were low, it is only by a couple of mph. Look at any tests on boattest.com that have 350 Mags (300HP at prop) in them. Most are just under 60, with a few just touching it.

I look forward to your tweaks and testing results. I think you will be surprised by some of the differences, especially if you are not planing to run the rpms of "go fast" boats or cars.

I for sure dont know a lot about hulls but every time I read something about a Stingray it is always mentioned that they are a fast hulls. Maybe not, is that just from their advertising?

I couldn't find much in the way of 3rd party tests on the 1988 hull. Lots of references to it being fast and that they handled well.

The 2012 Stingray Maxim is 22 foot and described as a "Z plane" hull with a 300hp merc and speed claims of mid 60's, with a bravo drive no less.

http://www.boattest.com/boats/boat_video.aspx?ID=2668#bt-Overviews

My tweaks will probably be put off until I can justify buying a better boat. Id like to find a 232 Caravelle interceptor. The pile of small block stuff i have lying around will leave me lots of power options but its pretty far down the list for now. I have a teen going into college next year.
The interceptor hulls push quite nicely into the high 70's and 80's, but you guys might not believe that...;)
 

wca_tim

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
1,708
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

I read through some of the discussion about comparison(s) above. Unfortunately the bottom line is that there are too many independant variables involved to draw a lot of hard and fast conclusions. Regarding td rich and his boat, I've read the majority of those threads on several boards and don't view him as a reliable source of information. the story has changed and changes. enough said...

Regarding power and engine components, there is so much that goes into the detail of building an engine that no two builders will get the same results - even with exactly the same components. Then there's the tune. how many of you that have really tweaked your engines out have experimented carefully with timing? some engines like more timing than others... Play and tweak to your hearts content, but don't get too caught up in splitting hairs - enjoy the ride! Regarding ignitions. The tbolt 4 is a great ignition. I got better idle characteristics with a crane ignition box installed, but it did not change the top speed. The local marine builder told me flat out that the stock ignition would do as well as anything unless we got extreme with what were trying to pull out of a little small block...

oh, I've read a lot of mkos posts here on some other boards and have a strong impression he knows his stuff. he does have a smaller boat...

Greg, to be honest, I'll be shocked if you get more than 65 out of your rig with the current build after it's tuned and you're played with set up a bit. I'm talking honest, gps numbers, normal operating conditions, no current, etc... and by the way, that'll be enough to SMOKE the vast majority of 70 mph boats out there any day of the week... very few i/o small block pleasure boats actually run much faster than 60...

Regarding a high performance alpha drive - it's called a bravo...

The ss drive is not going to really be that much stronger - the vast majority of the parts are interchangeable and in fact have the same part numbers. it will however be a decent bit faster than a standard alpha and handle better in many situations. My boat was several mph faster with a 1.32 gear ratio alpha ss, and I'm betting it will be another several mph faster with an ss running a higher gear ratio and taller props. that shorter drive also got much better fuel economy... Note also that the alpha ss drive has the o-ring groove on the vertical shaft which is a well-documented source of weakness and that shaft is a different length than the standard alpha and is no longer available. if you break one you're shortening and resplining a standard alpha shaft... We don't hear about as many ss drives failing as standard dimension alphas because there aren't enough of them running around to make any comparison.

just my two cents... hope everyone can get out on the water and have some fun today! Cheers
 

greg82255

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
781
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

I'd be happy with 65. Ideally I'd like to see 70 but I'm also realistic.

Tim, I remember somewhere in other threads that you said have better luck running a higher ratio and bigger prop. Do you think I'll see a speed increase going from 1.5 to 1.65 or 1.8 drive with a bigger prop? I'll probably end up buying a new drive either way when this one goes..
 

Flysfloatsor

Banned
Joined
Oct 7, 2010
Messages
202
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

I ran a 1.65 Alpha behind my 383, with a 25 Mirage Plus. It was a nice set up, Pulled HARD. I switched to a 1.5 for top end. and because I had it.

Now I run the 1.5 With a Labbed 25 Standard Mirage. GPS is 64 at 4850rpm.

Ive got some valve float issues going on at 4950rpm. Im not sure whats up with it. If I got the valve float issues sorted, It would be a legit 70 mph open bow Runabout...

The weight of my boat is listed (with a stock engine) at 2125lbs. Id say im about 1950lbs with all the cast iron I replaced with aluminum.
 

greg82255

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
781
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

I ran a 1.65 Alpha behind my 383, with a 25 Mirage Plus. It was a nice set up, Pulled HARD. I switched to a 1.5 for top end. and because I had it.

Now I run the 1.5 With a Labbed 25 Standard Mirage. GPS is 64 at 4850rpm.

Ive got some valve float issues going on at 4950rpm. Im not sure whats up with it. If I got the valve float issues sorted, It would be a legit 70 mph open bow Runabout...

The weight of my boat is listed (with a stock engine) at 2125lbs. Id say im about 1950lbs with all the cast iron I replaced with aluminum.

Interesting.. My boat is listed at 3250 lbs, so I am probably somewhere around 3100 with all the cast iron removed. Hopefully I'll end up in the 65+range also.. Right now I have a 21" Mirage and a 25" Laser II to try out. I assume I'll end up with a 23 or 24 once I figure out the #s.

I just got the drive back on today and finished up a few more minor odds and ends that needed to get done. All I need to do now is get a flame arrester and finish up the plumbing for the exhaust, and it will be splash time.
 

Tail_Gunner

Admiral
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
6,237
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

I'd be happy with 65. Ideally I'd like to see 70 but I'm also realistic.

Tim, I remember somewhere in other threads that you said have better luck running a higher ratio and bigger prop. Do you think I'll see a speed increase going from 1.5 to 1.65 or 1.8 drive with a bigger prop? I'll probably end up buying a new drive either way when this one goes..


I guess it is not correct to say going to a higher ratio and larger prop will always fail....But a larger prop wil always increase drag....going from 3 to 4 blades can cause as much as 5mph stick with the 1.5.
 

joewithaboat

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Jul 3, 2011
Messages
1,172
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

I ran a 1.65 Alpha behind my 383, with a 25 Mirage Plus. It was a nice set up, Pulled HARD. I switched to a 1.5 for top end. and because I had it.

Now I run the 1.5 With a Labbed 25 Standard Mirage. GPS is 64 at 4850rpm.

Ive got some valve float issues going on at 4950rpm. Im not sure whats up with it. If I got the valve float issues sorted, It would be a legit 70 mph open bow Runabout...

The weight of my boat is listed (with a stock engine) at 2125lbs. Id say im about 1950lbs with all the cast iron I replaced with aluminum.

4850 rpm is awful low for valve float.

You sure your not hitting a stock rev limiter??
 

Scott Danforth

Grumpy Vintage Moderator still playing with boats
Staff member
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
49,548
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

Greg, how soon until the wrenching is done so we can get an actual GPS WOT report?
 

greg82255

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
781
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

Greg, how soon until the wrenching is done so we can get an actual GPS WOT report?

Should be done tomorrow. I just need to finish up the plumbing for the exhaust, put on the drive shower, test everything out and clean up the boat. I'm pretty busy this weekend so next week I'll launch it and get some GPS #s.
 

John_S

Rear Admiral
Joined
Jun 21, 2004
Messages
4,269
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

4850 rpm is awful low for valve float.

You sure your not hitting a stock rev limiter??

I'd agree with Joe. Too low an rpm for valve float even with factory springs and roller lifters. If I remember correctly, 5500rpm is where that will typically raise its head.

If you are using T5 ignition, then there is a good chance you are hitting rev limiter.
 

Flysfloatsor

Banned
Joined
Oct 7, 2010
Messages
202
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

I'd agree with Joe. Too low an rpm for valve float even with factory springs and roller lifters. If I remember correctly, 5500rpm is where that will typically raise its head.

If you are using T5 ignition, then there is a good chance you are hitting rev limiter.

Greg: Im excited to hear your results. Your formula might be faster than mine due to hull design. Im just in a Mid 1980's Chris Craft. Comfortable riding hull, but not designed for big top end numbers.
Gunner: Whenever I refer to bigger prop, Im alwys meaning more pitch, not larger diameter. I assume most people are, but the confusion is because we are all saying the incorrect thing...

Im using the TB IV - With no rev limiter. My cam sould be good to 5500rpm. (CompCams XM262)
Spring pressures are w/i recommended CompCams specs.
 

greg82255

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
781
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

Hit a slight problem today..

I finished everything up and fired up the motor inside the boat, and hear a very distinct clicking noise from inside the 2-4-6-8 bank. Looks like the valves need to be adjusted after all. It's a little weird because I didn't hear any clicking when I ran it on the stand... Maybe it's because now the engine is in a closed compartment and the noise from the exhaust isn't overpowering anymore? Anything else the clicking could/would likely be? The temp and oil pressure was fine while I was running it.
 

Flysfloatsor

Banned
Joined
Oct 7, 2010
Messages
202
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

I would say its the valves. Ive read for hours about valve adjustment, and tried it several times (never the running method) and I can never get them adjusted correctly. Ive even over tightened some a few times and broken rocker studs. So I always take it to someone.

The running methehod seems easy enough, I just dont want to get oil all over my boat.
 

greg82255

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
781
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

Yea agreed - Joe has explained the running method to me at least twice in this thread. I think it's time to try it out. Should have done it before I put the engine back in - it would have been easier to clean oil off the garage floor than the bilge, but oh well. Going to start digging through past posts to figure out where he explained it.
 

wca_tim

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
1,708
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

I'd be happy with 65. Ideally I'd like to see 70 but I'm also realistic.

Tim, I remember somewhere in other threads that you said have better luck running a higher ratio and bigger prop. Do you think I'll see a speed increase going from 1.5 to 1.65 or 1.8 drive with a bigger prop? I'll probably end up buying a new drive either way when this one goes..

I've run a standard alpha drive behind the same engine with 1.5, 1.61 and 1.84 gear ratios. It was several miles per hour faster for each step up in gear ratio (ie 1.84 was a good bit faster than 1.5), and the short drive with a 1.32 ratio was the fastest of the lot, but only by a few mph over the 1.84. That was after each was propped right (there's a line of props in my garage even after I've sold some that I bought while playing). This is consistent with what folks have told me and what I've read about setting up I/O boats for speed.

The issue of a bigger prop creating more drag is with respect to diameter and surface area. Also, most all decent props are progressively pitched anyhow (the pitch is different for different parts of the blade).

The engine / offshore builder that put my bottom end together told me to keep the 1.84 ratio I had when I put it together the first time (I started with a 4.3). I was assuming I needed a 1.5 ratio and ready to buy a new upper drive. he winked at me and told me it might be a little bit faster... spot on.

The biggest reason is that you can get into props that are best for high performance - where pitch is 1.8-2.0 times diameter for anything going over 50 or 60 mph... and the blade has just enough surface area and diameter to hold (too small a prop, it'll blow out in corners, cavitate more easily, etc..., too big and you won't get any slip and will be paying a high cost in drag as well as straining the heck out of the drive).

Turns out that the sweet spot for most boats in our size range is 13 1/2" - 15" in diameter so the best props for speed / performance are going to be in the 25-30" pitch range. run some numbers using a prop slip calculator or doing a little simple math with the assumption that a boat's max speed is going to be around 70, assume around 8-10% slip, redline the engine at 5500 rpms and you're running something like a 28" prop with a 1.84 gear ratio...

Turning a higher pitch prop slower has a couple of advantages. It gives you less drag (a lower pitch prop turns faster and so the blade surface area contacts quite a bit more water, the other is that for modern prop designs (3 and 4 blade, mostly submerged, changes when it is surfaced), somewhere in that pitch range is the most efficient conversion of torque (rotational force) to forward thrust.

Now, before you go jumping onto getting a different gear ratio.
1.6 is a no no - smallest teeth (24 - 24), weakest gears hardest to get tolerances set up right. The ratio would be perfect for chasing 90's in my boat, but I learned the hard way that the 24-24 gear set sucks and is really easy to break.

1.81 / 1.84 works well and is a strong gear set, but you'll generally pay a premium for props that have higher pitch (ie 26-30"), are designed to be submerged and have small enough blade diameter and area so you get some slip. Also, you'll have the added potential issue that you may have problems with engine cooling - as the gear ratio goes up, the vertical shaft turns slower... and so does your impeller / water pump... A lot of the higher pitch props (around here anyhow), are designed for big horsepower boats (ie bigblock, 500+++ hp, etc...) and are too much wheel for a little alpha drive. you need some slip, especially out of the hole to keep from putting too much strain on the drive.

The bottom line, why buy a new drive? run what you have and prop it for your peak horsepower to be right at wot. you might give up a 4-5 mph top end over a 1.8 gear drive, BUT you'll sacrifice cooling efficiency (a weak impeller may not keep you cool enough to run as long...), and you'll not be able to use the most widely available (and cheapest...) props.

of course... I didn't pay attention to this, didn't have any real cooling problems and have a half a dozen props that work great in that range at this point, but I tend to do things the long way around...

Hope this is helpful... Just my current understanding which might be worth what you paid for it... ;-)
 

Scott Danforth

Grumpy Vintage Moderator still playing with boats
Staff member
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
49,548
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

Yea agreed - Joe has explained the running method to me at least twice in this thread. I think it's time to try it out. Should have done it before I put the engine back in - it would have been easier to clean oil off the garage floor than the bilge, but oh well. Going to start digging through past posts to figure out where he explained it.

Greg,

if you put a rag over the rockers, you wont have oil spraying everywhere.
 

greg82255

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
781
Re: Here We Go: My 383 Stroker Winter Project

Valve adjusting attempt # 2. Tried and failed. I can't seem to get these valves right. I posted a video of the noise just to confirm that it is the valves. Please let me know what you guys think. The noise is only coming from the 2-4-6-8 bank.
 
Top