drewpster
Commander
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2006
- Messages
- 2,059
Re: My tri-hull transom replacement w/ pics
My boat did not have any foam under the deck and I did not put any under it. I read somewhere that the Coast Guard started requiring manufacturers to use a certain amount of floatation foam in production boat hulls. I do not know what year this requirement kicked in but it must have been later than the late seventies because my boat did not have any. Since the boat did not have foam originally we can assume it is not needed for structure.
I did not add any foam. I saw no real benefit of doing so.
Foam can have its advantages, like sound reduction, and obviously, added floatation. However foam soaks water and has been the cause of allot of rot in wooden core boats. Generally speaking, I would never use foam unless the original design had it for structural reasons. There is no practical reason for it in my boat.
My boat did not have any foam under the deck and I did not put any under it. I read somewhere that the Coast Guard started requiring manufacturers to use a certain amount of floatation foam in production boat hulls. I do not know what year this requirement kicked in but it must have been later than the late seventies because my boat did not have any. Since the boat did not have foam originally we can assume it is not needed for structure.
I did not add any foam. I saw no real benefit of doing so.
Foam can have its advantages, like sound reduction, and obviously, added floatation. However foam soaks water and has been the cause of allot of rot in wooden core boats. Generally speaking, I would never use foam unless the original design had it for structural reasons. There is no practical reason for it in my boat.