Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

RubberFrog

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Messages
4,268
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

Smoke up! Put holes in your carpet and upholstery! Stink up your clothes, your breath and your hair! Go for it! But to do it in a public place and stink up others is rude and classless. Even a farting frog knows this....

You can't have sex in public.
You can't burn your leaves/trash in public.
You can't smoke in public.
 

stevieray

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
1,135
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

But if you can't smoke in public, how's everybody gonna know how cool you look with that butt hangin' outta your yap? :p
 

JRJ

Commander
Joined
Sep 11, 2001
Messages
2,992
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

Smoking smells bad.:|
Sex smells good.8):love:
Burning leaves gets smoke in my eyes.:'(
 

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

I am with Pony except that I enjoy these threads for exactly the reason he doesn't. Challenge. It is tough to look out for everybody, so I want to err on the side of less restrictions, not more. I really do not see much of a difference between smokey engines and cigarettes. Yes, it would be nice if everybody had the latest technology, but be careful. Why not require electric boats?

This is literally debated very heavily where we often boat at Lake Havasu. There is a Channel that was dug to go under the London Bridge, ya know, buy a bridge, stick it on dry land, and then like everybody else, dig a channel under the bridge so you need it . . . := Anyway . .. this channel has become like a Cruise the Boulevard deal. Some would hate it of course, but if you ever liked that scene with Hot Rods, you can understand the same with hot boats etc. Anyway, huge Carbon Monoxide issue and they are considering shutting it down on busy weekends etc. Me? I know what I am getting myself into, so I don't go in when I don't want to breathe stagnant fumes orrrr if I don't want my youngest exposed to the sins of the flesh (I just read the articles) . . . BTW, that's another, very similar, discussion. One man's eye candy is another man's porn . . .
 

bekosh

Lieutenant
Joined
Apr 27, 2004
Messages
1,382
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

This issue isn't about the rights of smokers or the rights of non-smokers. This is about the rights of property owners.

If I'm a smoker, I have no right to enter your property and light up without your permision. And if I'm a non-smoker I don't have the right to tell you that you can't allow smoking on your property if you want.

It is that simple. The smokers and non-smokers have NO rights in this. The only ones who have any rights in this are the property owners, and they are having their rights destroyed by an oppresive goverment.
:shoot:
 

Pony

Rear Admiral
Joined
Jun 27, 2004
Messages
4,355
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

Oppressive goverment is a bit of stretch.......go to one of the small African countries near the diamond trade and try that argument.

This is NOT about property owner rights IMHO..... If property owners could do anything they wanted to, then maybe I will go open up a brothel, sell some weed, serve alchohol to minors.........etc etc etc. So then I suppose building codes and health codes are an oppression by the government? It is afterall the right of a restaurant owner to serve me an e-coli laden steak is it not? To me smoking laws are just an extension of laws that protect us from stuff like that.....but like I said I think it only applies when the majority of your business is food. It is unfair for a bar to be smoke free because they sell a few pizzas to people in the bar.

Like I said, ride now I side for less legislation, but there still should be some.
 

Plainsman

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
4,062
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

I just want to know where the flippin ACLU is. This is a total violation of civil rights.
So if I smoke in my house and a neighbor complains, I can't smoke in my house because the smell offends them? Than that should be applied to all smells that offends someone. I can think of quite a few that offend me (RF :love:) and some perfumes need to be banned as well.
Where does it stop is the big question. Flippin government is really starting to **** me off.
 

Pony

Rear Admiral
Joined
Jun 27, 2004
Messages
4,355
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

Exaggeration is certainly a argumentative tactic here isnt it.............when has this EVER been an issue?

So if I smoke in my house and a neighbor complains, I can't smoke in my house because the smell offends them?

I mean come on, thats kind of well what the proposed bill in this thread wants to have happen.....smoking in your own home.

We are talking about PUBLIC areas, that serve you guessed it the PUBLIC......i.e BOTH non smokers and smokers.

 

Plainsman

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
4,062
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

Pony said:
Exaggeration is certainly a argumentative tactic here isnt it.............when has this EVER been an issue?

So if I smoke in my house and a neighbor complains, I can't smoke in my house because the smell offends them?

I mean come on, thats kind of well what the proposed bill in this thread wants to have happen.....smoking in your own home.

We are talking about PUBLIC areas, that serve you guessed it the PUBLIC......i.e BOTH non smokers and smokers.


Is it Exaggeration? Bet that is what you thought when smoking was banned at the work place and some fool like me suggested that bars would be next.
I have no problem with it not being allowed at work and in resturants. But in public? Tell me how 2nd hand smoke will affect you in the outdooors? Ever see the "brown cloud" over a city? Now that is disgusting and dangerous. But wait, that must be an Exaggeration.
 

xtraham

Lieutenant
Joined
Jul 20, 2006
Messages
1,425
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

Pony said:
I will go open up a brothel, sell some weed, serve alchohol to minors....

Pony said:


A) There are already laws against drunk driving.........so your point is?
B) Unprotected sex involves two people who are consenting to the consequences......so again your point is?



 

Pony

Rear Admiral
Joined
Jun 27, 2004
Messages
4,355
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

Plainsman said:
Pony said:
Exaggeration is certainly a argumentative tactic here isnt it.............when has this EVER been an issue?

So if I smoke in my house and a neighbor complains, I can't smoke in my house because the smell offends them?

I mean come on, thats kind of well what the proposed bill in this thread wants to have happen.....smoking in your own home.

We are talking about PUBLIC areas, that serve you guessed it the PUBLIC......i.e BOTH non smokers and smokers.


Is it Exaggeration? Bet that is what you thought when smoking was banned at the work place and some fool like me suggested that bars would be next.
I have no problem with it not being allowed at work and in resturants. But in public? Tell me how 2nd hand smoke will affect you in the outdooors? Ever see the "brown cloud" over a city? Now that is disgusting and dangerous. But wait, that must be an Exaggeration.

First tell me where I said anything about public OUTDOOR space. Everytime I have said public I am talking about enclosed spaces..........

Yeah I did mention the 30ft outside building entrances rule, which I am in favor of......but alas before you read into my words whatever you want to, loet me explain that I am in favor of that ON CAMPUS, I don't have an oppinion about other public places......I mean public buildings.
 

Pony

Rear Admiral
Joined
Jun 27, 2004
Messages
4,355
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

xtraham said:
Pony said:
I will go open up a brothel, sell some weed, serve alchohol to minors....

Pony said:


A) There are already laws against drunk driving.........so your point is?
B) Unprotected sex involves two people who are consenting to the consequences......so again your point is?




The point still remains the same......We have laws against drunk driving to prevent injury to the innocent. Same goes for health codes in restaurantes.....We can mostly agree those rules are good and yet smoking somehow is different........yet imho it is not.
 

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

There has already been a proposal, in Santa Monica I believe, of banning smoking in Apartment buildings because the supposedly deadly second-hand smoke can drift into another apartment and kill innocent women and children . . . What about condos? Aren't they property owners?
 

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

I, for one, am tickled pink as I watch the tobacco slaves scurry out the door like lemmings, while I sit back & enjoy an ice cold pint of Harp.........;):)
 

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

QC said:
There has already been a proposal, in Santa Monica I believe, of banning smoking in Apartment buildings because the supposedly deadly second-hand smoke can drift into another apartment and kill innocent women and children . . . What about condos? Aren't they property owners?
Maybe they should charge the ofenders with attemted murder........:)
 

treedancer

Commander
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
2,216
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

In olden times they were called lepers, now they are called smokers. Lets make a law that they have to carry a bell, and ring it when they approach other citizens, instead of saying leper, leper, say smoker, smoker.8)
 

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

Haut said:
Maybe they should charge the ofenders with attemted murder.
That there, is entirely possible, and I'll bet, if it hasn't already been attempted, you'll hear about it soon. Just as WBW will be charged with attempted murder for keeping 2 strokes running, and by knowing that the exhaust can kill you, it is premeditated. Funny thing is that most are snickering at this . . . ;)
 

Limited-Time

Vice Admiral
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
5,820
Re: Belmont CA a Stupid town in a Stupid state

I own a building, in my building I choose to open a restaurant. In MY restaurant I want to allow MY customers the choice to smoke or not. If YOU do not want to be subjected to the second hand smoke DON"T patronize MY establishment. It's that easy, There is NO reason for the government to interfere in MY business and OUTLAW an activity that is not obscene, immoral or Illegal.

BTW FYI I am not now and have never been a smoker...............or restaurateur.
 
Top