dingbat
Supreme Mariner
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2001
- Messages
- 16,073
Re: trolling plate
Your explanation makes no sense at all.
A lower unit designed for 200/225 HP is not strong enough to handle the "heavy load" of trolling yet a beefed up, high thrust 9.9 HP is?
I would have assumed that a lower unit could handle 2.5% of its rated capacity without a problem. I guess I was wrong.
It takes X amount of thrust to push a boat thru the water. Cutting off 2 cylinders is not going to change that demand. On the contrary, cutting off two cylinders will increase the load on the remaining two cylinders. One would expect that distributing that ?heavy load? on just two cylinders would be detrimental to the longevity of the motor.
They do and that's why the now discontinued Yamaha 8 Kicker and the Merc 9.9 pro kicker have beefed up lower units and are high thrust. Two strokes absolutely do not last long when operated under heavy loads. [Merc solved the issue by producing the 100, 115 and 125 2+2 motors that run on two cylinders up to about 1500 RPM. They also produce smaller mid size engines with the Big Foot option.
Your explanation makes no sense at all.
A lower unit designed for 200/225 HP is not strong enough to handle the "heavy load" of trolling yet a beefed up, high thrust 9.9 HP is?
I would have assumed that a lower unit could handle 2.5% of its rated capacity without a problem. I guess I was wrong.
It takes X amount of thrust to push a boat thru the water. Cutting off 2 cylinders is not going to change that demand. On the contrary, cutting off two cylinders will increase the load on the remaining two cylinders. One would expect that distributing that ?heavy load? on just two cylinders would be detrimental to the longevity of the motor.