Re: Terri Schiavo
So, all those kids who are born with severe mental problems, the ones you see in the mall in the wheel chairs around Christmas time....the ones drooling down their chest and not aware of where they are or what is going on around them. These kids should be starved to death. Sure it would ultimately unburden their families and society of the emotional and financial trouble of keeping them around. And these elderly folks wasting away in nursing homes, they have contributed all they ever will to society and now that they are no longer able to produce, they definitely are candidates for starvation. Mercy starvation that is. <br /><br />Obviously these arcane notions of the inalienable right such trivialities such as "LIFE", "LIBERTY" and the.....get this...."PUSUITE OF HAPPINESS" are outdated concepts that should be cast off our enlightened society along with outmoded moralistic ideals such as frowning birth out wedlock, gay marriage, trust in GOD, the Bill Of Rights and the Constitution. Why on Earth shouldn't we as "well intentioned" Aquarians meet out starvation to to any inconvenience we face in our fellow man? Why have abortions when starving the mother and fetus together would prevent future unwanted pregnancies from that sperm recipient permanently! With any luck future generations would apply this legal precedent to politicians that don't pass legislation that their constituents demand! (Hey there IS a bright side to this argument!!)<br /><br />One real interesting question is where is the ACLU on this???? We can't use starvation as a means to execute death row inmates. What about the ASPCA? They lock up pet owners who starve those pesky little pets when they become a pain in the butt. The fact is that if you starve you're retarded child to death, you got to prison for murder. Why then are Judges who have sworn to uphold the Constitution, ruling that Terry no longer has her guaranteed right to life; a RIGHT afforded all Americans in the Bill of Rights? If her husband is allowed to starve her to death, where does it end? This is a clear extension of the right of a mother to destroy her unborn, healthy child. What is next? Starve your cheating spouse rather than divorce her and lose half your stuff? We are better than this. As Americans we are supposed to place a higher value on the sanctity of life than this. If Terry is starved to death, then we may as well hoist the French flag above the White House.