eeboater
Commander
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2004
- Messages
- 2,644
THANK YOU for finally say what we've all been screaming. THANK YOU for calling the hypocritical Democrats and Anti-War people out on the carpet. THANK YOU for showing that History is being "Re-written" with a negative spin.<br /><br />Finally.<br /><br /><EDIT ON>Fish in a barrell!!!!!<EDIT OFF><br /><br />
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/11/AR2005111100987_pf.htmlBUSH: And our debate at home must also be fair-minded. One of the hallmarks of a free society and what makes our country strong is that our political leaders can discuss their differences openly even in times of war.<br /><br />When I made the decision to remove Saddam Hussein from power, Congress approved it with strong bipartisan support.<br /><br />I also recognize that some of our fellow citizens and elected officials didn't support the liberation of Iraq. And that is their right, and I respect it.<br /><br />As president and commander in chief, I accept the responsibilities and the criticisms and the consequences that come with such a solemn decision.<br /><br />While it's perfectly legitimate to criticize my decision or the conduct of the war, it is deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of how that war began.<br /><br />(APPLAUSE)<br /><br />BUSH: Some Democrats and anti-war critics are now claiming we manipulated the intelligence and misled the American people about why we went to war.<br /><br />These critics are fully aware that a bipartisan Senate investigation found no evidence of political pressure to change the intelligence community's judgments related to Iraq's weapons programs.<br /><br />They also know that intelligence agencies from around the world agreed with our assessment of Saddam Hussein.<br /><br />They know the United Nations passed more than a dozen resolutions, citing his development and possession of weapons of mass destruction.<br /><br />Many of these critics supported my opponent during the last election, who explained his position to support the resolution in the Congress this way: "When I vote to give the president of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat and a grave threat to our security."<br /><br />That's why more than 100 Democrats in the House and the Senate, who had access to the same intelligence, voted to support removing Saddam Hussein from power.<br /><br />(APPLAUSE)<br /><br />The stakes in the global war on terror are too high and the national interest is too important for politicians to throw out false charges.<br /><br />(APPLAUSE)<br /><br />These baseless attacks send the wrong signal to our troops and to an enemy that is questioning America's will.<br /><br />As our troops fight a ruthless enemy determined to destroy our way of life, they deserve to know that their elected leaders who voted to send them to war continue to stand behind them.