A copy of this communication has been forwarded to the Dairymans Association of Australia. "Guilt Sucks" (Down and out in Beverlyhills, 1986)QC said:The thing that continues to amaze me about these silly scares is that the same guy who marches against global warming, will march the next week about poor treatment of cows, and then march the next week about the plight of the small town dairy farmer . . .
My best customer in Australia is a Dairy Farming Cooperative. I think they feel guilty about cow farts, so they buy our stuff to reduce truck emissions, but the biggest benefit to them is lower fuel costs, so they can be more profitable and buy more cows. Also the fuel they use, liquid natural gas (LNG = Methane) vents to atmosphere when they fill their tanks. Probably more methane than all of the cow farts put together . . . Laugh all the way to the bank I guess; like a good, greedy, Commoner. Shhhhhhhhhh . . .
No, no no! RP your other left, your other left. :8)8)Reel said:That was my point pw.
If you can't blame Bush, it automatically becomes a ridiculous notion in the eyes of the left. Some will never see the forrest because of the trees.
QC said:Yeah techno, your version makes more sense
technostingray said:Edit: Are you saying that Rush did not quote the source? Spreading Gossip serves the same purpose as starting it. n'est pas?custombycrunch said:Nice to see you are keeping track of what Rush has to say, there's hope for you yet.
This is where I saw it Sunday, had nothing to do with Rush, sorry.
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2062484.ece
treedancer said:Man Ill be glad when this Rotator cuff operation I had six weeks ago heals. I wont be sitting here googling cow farts.:%
ricksrster said:News = gossip if you disagree with a point of view? How do we discern between news and gossip?
The left on many occasions go on the airwaves with ridiculous unfounded accusations just to be contrary for no resaon or to attack an opponent.
Reel said:That was my point pw.
If you can't blame Bush, it automatically becomes a ridiculous notion in the eyes of the left. Some will never see the forrest because of the trees.
PW2 said:. . . so that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, as does this thread.
. . . . has no basis in anything scientific.
. . . approach it with scientific methods, and not by ridiculing patently ridiculous notions.
QC said:Are you aware that methane from farm animals accounts for around 14% of global methane emissions (yes I have sources)? And this doesn't count the CO2 emitted by their breathing . . .
QC said:PW2 said:. . . so that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, as does this thread.
. . . . has no basis in anything scientific.
. . . approach it with scientific methods, and not by ridiculing patently ridiculous notions.
Ahem . . . are you suggesting that cow farts and Global Warming are not related from a scientific perspective?
Are you aware that Methane has a Global Warming Potential (GWP) of 21? Which means that each gram of methane is worth 21 grams of CO2 in GWP.
Are you aware that methane from farm animals accounts for around 14% of global methane emissions (yes I have sources)? And this doesn't count the CO2 emitted by their breathing . . .
Maybe GW science is worthless, but you can't chuck part of it simply because you don't like the smell of the data . . . :%