www.saturdaydownsouth.com
Interesting that some have that take on it. Personally I don’t think it was intended.How Oregon may have used an intentional penalty in final seconds to beat Ohio State
Oregon may have intentionally committed illegal substitution in the final seconds of its thrilling 1-point win over Ohio State.
What surprised me is that any time came off the clock. I would have thought it would have been considered like a false start. No play...How Oregon may have used an intentional penalty in final seconds to beat Ohio State
Oregon may have intentionally committed illegal substitution in the final seconds of its thrilling 1-point win over Ohio State.
They said it was intentional and had "practiced" it. That play isn't called till the play starts ... it doesn't automatically stop the clock. Since it was a running clock when it happened, the referee stops to clock at the end of the play to see if the other team wants to keep the play or accept the penalty. When the ball is set, the clock starts again. It shows a lot of football awareness, but is a shame that this was used to aid in the victory.
Did Oregon admit it was an intentional thing?
Coach said so ...
www.espn.com
www.espn.com
Yeah after I posted that I looked around and saw that.Coach said so ...
Lanning: Ducks purposely induced 12-men penalty
Oregon coach Dan Lanning said his team took a 12 men on the field penalty late in Saturday's win over Ohio State on purpose in an effort to burn time off the clock.
NCAA closes loophole on Ducks' 12-man penalty
The NCAA is closing the loophole used by Oregon to shave time off the game clock at the end of Saturday's win over Ohio State, when the Ducks intentionally used 12 players on defense.
I'm way ahead of the NFL. Didn't know about the loophole till 'Speck pointed it outNCAA closes loophole on Ducks' 12-man penalty
The NCAA is closing the loophole used by Oregon to shave time off the game clock at the end of Saturday's win over Ohio State, when the Ducks intentionally used 12 players on defense.
