ok folks, since no one asked me for them, here are my thoughts.
First, I use worldometers as my data source.
https://www.worldometers.info/
Plus for the rona specific info
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
acris, I really don't look at the death rate as it relates to the 'known outcome' number. Not all cases will be tracked to a conclusion, save for deaths. So to me that is artificially high of a percentage.
I'm looking at death rates as a percent to population, not just of what is being attributed to the rona. That will negate the argument over the purported massaging of the numbers by anyone to get more money from the government or whatever tin foil theory is out there.
Crude death rate is deaths over a period of time for every 1000 population.
Deaths / population * 1000
The world average for 2019 is 7.1 to 7.6 depending on what data source you use - numbers are revised as new info becomes avail as in most all statistics.
So i took todays snapshot and calculated using the above math but added at the end a multiplier of 3.25 to get a full year number, as that is what crude death rate is based on, not a snapshot. I used 3.25 as we are almost done with April. If I had saved my math from 1 April, I used a multiplier of 4, and there are four quarters in a year. At the end of April, you can use a multiplier of 3 as there then will be three trimesters in a year. So on. This multiplier was added to both death and YTD population growth.
Current death rate globally is 7.6 which is on par of course with average, but using the multiplier for a full year puts the toll at 7.6 as well.
Couple things I know is that less people die during the summer and more do during the winter. I'm thinking my 'joe math' averages that out.
What I haven't done is to test and projection of the math to any specific countries - ones that we can have a modicum of trust in the data. That might show a different story - especially in hard hit countries like Italy and Spain.
Additional thoughts - the number of infected people is an order of magnitude higher than we know of. Zero of the people I know have been tested and if you are relatively healthy it is becoming clear that you may be asymptomatic. As stated earlier in this thread I use 10 as my multiplier on the math for death by covid.
Also note that the number of 'serious' cases was floating between 4-6%, usually at 5% and now it is down to three as we get more testing done.
It is serious for old and unhealthy people just like the flu but what appears to be the case *imo* is that is is more virulent in its ability to spread so cases ramp up more quickly thus overwhelming medical resources.
Lastly I think at the end of the day it will be not much worse than a flue death rate and as with that there will be the sad stories of an otherwise healthy person, kid, baby whatever dying form it but overall about the same.
*pps - read up on Sweden as compared to the other Nordic countries. Perfect case study unfolding there. My sister lives in Denmark and was in Italy early feb for a week, came home sick. Mild symptoms just thought is was from partying too much and never went to the doc so we'll never know.