My wife's commute is only 1 mile, so I never cared about mpg's on it. It is a great vehicle, she's a little tired of the size thing. I need to talk her into keeping it, and go get myself a smallish car!Mike, I know exactly where you're coming from. Until a couple years ago I'd had nothing but pickups my entire driving life. My first vehicle in high school was a 68 Chevy. After a succession of Z71s I finally got fed up with constant quality issues with my last one and jumped ship. I figured I might as well go all in and got an Expedition so we could carry a second family with us when we towed the boat. I've been very happy with the truck, but my drive in to work is an easy eight miles or so, so the fifteen MPG average doesn't hurt me too badly. It has been a bit of an adjustment at times to not have a pickup bed, but there are also advantages, such as secure and dry cargo. On the other hand, as you've said there's so much room back there that sometimes said secure and dry cargo can stay there for weeks at a time.
My wife's commute is only 1 mile, so I never cared about mpg's on it. It is a great vehicle, she's a little tired of the size thing. I need to talk her into keeping it, and go get myself a smallish car!
My wife's commute is only 1 mile, so I never cared about mpg's on it. It is a great vehicle, she's a little tired of the size thing. I need to talk her into keeping it, and go get myself a smallish car!
I like Sylvan's idea. You know the Expedition does the job well and it isn't another pickup. BTW, Is it 4WD?
You know what kind of mileage a 496 8.1L avalanche gets? 9-12MPG tops! Not my choice for an 80mi round trip commute....
actually 12-14 is what I got in an 8.1 powered crew cab shortbed with 35" tires.... BUT the avalanches are available with other engines too.... the point is that it IS an option for any boat up to nearly dually territory.
the boat he has would be fine with a 1/2 ton and a 5.3
You know what I don't get, the fact that my 10 year old truck gets the same or better mpg's. I mean I'd be in at 22 city and 29 hwy. With twin turbo, v6, much testing, a lot more technology, same mpg as a high mileage 10 year old F150? I want better for my $$$. Not a more round about way to get more of the same. My 86 F150 4x4 with 33's(back in the day) got 20 mpg all day long, with the 300 6 cyl. I just think I am so done with--new trucks.I know it's a truck but the new ford f-150 eco boost V6 twin turbo mileage is rated 16 city 22 hwy and has towing capacity of 11,300 lbs.
You know what I don't get, the fact that my 10 year old truck gets the same or better mpg's. I mean I'd be in at 22 city and 29 hwy. With twin turbo, v6, much testing, a lot more technology, same mpg as a high mileage 10 year old F150? I want better for my $$$. Not a more round about way to get more of the same. My 86 F150 4x4 with 33's(back in the day) got 20 mpg all day long, with the 300 6 cyl. I just think I am so done with--new trucks.
You know what I don't get, the fact that my 10 year old truck gets the same or better mpg's. I mean I'd be in at 22 city and 29 hwy. With twin turbo, v6, much testing, a lot more technology, same mpg as a high mileage 10 year old F150? I want better for my $$$. Not a more round about way to get more of the same. My 86 F150 4x4 with 33's(back in the day) got 20 mpg all day long, with the 300 6 cyl. I just think I am so done with--new trucks.
I had an '87 F150 with the 300 6. Those were great engines. I didn't get anywhere near 20 MPG, but that might have had something to do with the driver.