I have no point, just as you don't either. This is a pointless thread. But I would be interested to hear how the 2 have nothing to do with each other. We can televise and celebrate the death of our enemies, but not to mourn our own. Just another example of the Administration flaunting the good while hiding the bad. It gets real old.<br /><br />Out of sight out of mind I suppose.
I have no problem with that....I don't care that we put his photo up, I care that the other side of the death toll isn't allowed to be shown.
<br /><br />This is too good for him.<br /><br />"Now just wrap him up in a pigs hide and plant him in a pigs pen. BTW I have nothing against swine."
You would see a problem with that, because the US armed forces got him, his closest droogies, his house, and not the other way around. I wish they could've beheaded him while he was still alive and trying to roll-off the gurney, (a medical rescue device btw), and the video of that event sent to aljazeerah and CBS. This differing opinion of ours further hilights our polarized society. So be it. I would rather be polarised than vested in American defeat.<br />And in the meantime, I will loudly celebrate his demise. He will kill no more. May he burn forever in hell.
There was 10,000 reasons to rat out the scumbag, and potentially another 25,000,000 reasons still to be decided. Yeah, that's the reward money the person that ratted out the scumbag will collect;$10k for his location, $25-mil for the man himself. Don't think it had anything to do with power struggles. This I heard on the news lastnight.
So, because the war is not over after the death of one Alqueda terrorist (killed in IRAQ btw, not afghanestan), we must cut and run like the french and spaniards?<br />You said it yourself, PW -- {you}"just don't see this as cause to celebrate just yet, until the Iraqi people greet us like the French people did as we liberated France after WW II".<br />"Realistically" speaking, this will probably NEVER take place, will it? <br /><br />And yet, you chose to compare Iraq to WWII France as opposed to WWII Japan, or WWII Germany! And just where the hell were you when they pulled the sandman's statue down amoung a jubulent throng of Iraqis? -- Or did you forget about that as well as the planes crashing into the towers piloted by alzarscumbag's predecessors ??<br /><br />Me? Grasp on reailty? Chile, pleeez.<br /><br /><br /> The fact that you do not see the forest that is squarely in front of your face for the trees paraded before you on CBS nitely news, seperates a nation into two factions. sad commentary, my iboats friend.
Then that's why this has been such a struggle. Bush said this would be a quick war, and has made proclamations in evidence that he believed that. What he failed to crank into the equation was that he was going to war with an inept "clinton era" military, although he thought it was the best trained and well-equipped military in the world. Somebody should have told him.
