Inaddition, German U-boats were sinking American merchant ships in the hundreds and plotted plans for Mexico to invade the U. S. even before War was declared. Could that be the cause of going to war?Originally posted by Haut Medoc:<br /> Dave, you are wrong....Germany declared war on U.S. first.....I think that lots of bombs doesn't really fit into what is widely accepted criteria for WMD...Sorry!.......JK
TX I have never seen a better example of the "pot calling the kettle black" in my entire life.Originally posted by txswinner:<br /> <br />Dogsdad, You are a simple name caller and your comments always bleat the same blind mindset. To you there is no hope.
How True,........<br /><br />If another Liberal had been elected,.......<br /><br />We would Still be fighting this War, with the FBI,......<br />After All,.......<br />It was Clinton that deemed this a "Police Issue",......<br />Without National Security Concerns............Originally posted by 62_Kiwi:<br /> Here's my 2 cents worth...<br /><br />This war started long before W was president, but it became truely visible to all of us on 9/11.<br /><br />At that time the war had shifted to mainland USA, however it has now located itself in Iraq and Afganistan. The reason for this is that your own military forces (with some help from friends) took it there. <br /><br />Under a lesser president, the war of terror may well still be rolling out in the civilised cities of the western world.<br /><br />Nobody I know of has yet come up with a better plan than W in my opinion. Certainly the job has been tougher than most of us expected.<br /><br />W has my support and so do all the troops serving or have served in this godawful war.<br /><br />We should focus on victory rather than second guessing decisions made in the past.
Unlike the blindly-following-bush bunch, CJY and tx, you folks really think and ask questions. With the exception of JB who admitted he voted for the idiot and who said he served when he was called on to do so and therefore has credentials to comment, the rest of you are simply spewing the party line again, and that truly shows the intelligence level. When you can't stand on the facts and values of the situation the party followers fall back on the tried and true, try to put the dissenters on the defensive. Accuse them of refusing to answer your question, when in reality you are avoiding the questions posed by those who are actually thinking for themselves.<br /><br />This war is baby bush's war. Afghanistan was possibly part of the war on terror and therefore was America's war. Intelligence available to the idiot-in-chief cast doubts on WMD's in Iraq. For those baby bush backers with poor long-term memory that was the reason we invaded Iraq. Later the bush administration had to try and fleece the American people and ran damage control telling us it was to bring democracy to the Iraqi people. I don't ever recall the Iraqi people ask for democracy.<br /><br />If this Iraq war was to be America's war, they would have had real terrorist ties, like Iran, among other countries. Instead baby bush had a bug for Saddam and nothing would stop w from satisfying his fetish.<br /><br />As for half-a**ed ways of doing things, please demonstrate with fact and no party cr*p how baby bush has been anything but that way with this war. He sent in personnel with little or no equipment properly designed and intended for the service it was required to perform. We had soldiers over there with poor and inadequate personal protective equipment, even more poorly protected vehicles and insufficient numbers of troops to begin with. When reports from the front come back saying the military leaders are asking for more troops but baby bush isn't interested in listening, that's certainly not full-a**ed. This is w's war. Robin Williams was right...Originally posted by CJY:<br />I can agree with you on this point EE. However, W has been going about the war half a22ed since the beginning, otherwise it would have been ended long ago.<br /><br />This war cannot be won, only lost. The difference between all of you with the belief we must stay and myself believing we must get out is our belief in the "plan." <br /><br />Even though none of us have ever heard of the "plan" to end this and get out, you believe one exists while I do not.<br /><br />As far as being politically correct with death vs casualty. I wonder if they call it a casualty while the eulogy is being given. I wonder if it is less painful when the casket is being lowered into the Earth. I wonder if looking at your "casualty" for the final time before closing the casket is any less painful. What I really wonder is if these "casualties" will all be worth it when we pull out while having accomplished nothing more than we accomplished after the first month or so.<br /><br />I'm not a fan of doing things half-a**.What confuses me is the mentality that we can fix things for everybody around the world while we cannot fix issues in out own back yard.<br /><br />I seem to remember W standing in front of the camera shortly after the attack making the declaration of "the war is over." Just more bull. <br /><br />The sitcom mentality where everything should be done in 30 minutes and it should have a happy ending is running rampant.<br />Iraq did not bring the war to us, we brought it to them. The person responsible for attacking us here is sitting on a beach drinking a margarita somewhere with little concern from our almighty W.<br /><br />If I had to make the choice between us going over there to fight, and them coming over here to fight - I think we should go over there, as we did.<br />Emphasis on the "what we started" part. I think this says a great deal.<br /><br />Why don't you want us to FINISH what we started?<br />Did we win in Vietnam? They raised the white flag and became a Democracy? All of Vietnam?<br /><br /><br />I'm not sure that we all understand death and its finality. As EE stated, this is not a sit-com and things are not ok after 30 minutes. We entered with no plan, have no plan today, and will have no plan tomorrow. It's tough to draw up a plan when you don't know when it is won.<br /><br />Many victories have been claimed; the statue of Sadaam being toppled, purple fingered voters, etc. But it still appears today in Iraq as it did shortly after Sadaam was removed.<br /><br />We will end up pulling out with little accomplished. The difference of later vs. sooner is more death.but from every account I have heard or read about people say we didn't pull out of that country right. Why would you want to do that again
....JKThis war is baby bush's war. Afghanistan was possibly part of the war on terror and therefore was America's war. Intelligence available to the idiot-in-chief cast doubts on WMD's in Iraq. For those baby bush backers with poor long-term memory that was the reason we invaded Iraq. Later the bush administration had to try and fleece the American people and ran damage control telling us it was to bring democracy to the Iraqi people. I don't ever recall the Iraqi people ask for democracy.<br /><br />