P.s. We have always had one checkimg account. We both deposit our checks and whatever we have left we discuss what we will do with it i.e spend, save, etc.
You have to keep in mind, love is unconditional. Comparing income or who pays what seems petty to me and we've been married 33 years. The only stress or discussion we ever had over finances is not having enough of it at times.
^....^ That's the only way it worked for us, ya can't have your money and my money in a husband and wife relationship. Work for a common goal with your combined earnings and move forward.
maybe you can't, but not everyone is the same.
I'm with you then I guess. All people and situations are different. Just how it has worked for us for 33 together and 31 married.
I'm in my shoes and not others. Either way, best of luck to OP!!
a pre nup will only show her how much you don't trust her.
There is no need for a prenup unless you already have assets. That was my point before. Get everything in writing to establish who came in with what(including debts) entering marriage. It has nothing to do with trust. It just establishes a baseline. I really don't see how doing this is a bad thing.Unless you have a lot of assets, (property, stocks, money in the bank) a pre nup will only show her how much you don't trust her.
There is no need for a prenup unless you already have assets.
You are talking about 0.001% of the poulation. New York where you are from and California where I am from are community property states. All assets acquired during the marriage are 50/50. A lot of prenups in our states won't be held valid if they go against those laws. Likewise, with spousal/child support, which is calculated with a computer program, typically dissomaster.I have to disagree here.
If I may make one observation here ...
There appears to be 2 camps on this issue. One camp says pre-nup, keep everything seperate, etc. The other camp says no to the pre-nup, needs to be based on trust, community possessions, money, etc (whether that is one account or 7, both know what the other is doing and feel all should be open and transparent).
Hope I didn't read any more or less into either camp, but they are pretty opposed to each other. Now look at the relationships of the 2 groups. Most in the first come from broken marriages and have been burned or stung. Most in the second group have had longer and apparently successful marriages.
The question is, which fact drives the other ... a successful marriage breeds the trust and desire to keep things in common. Of the keeping of things in common breeds a successful marriage? And vice-versa for the other camp.
Just something to think about ...
I had a feeling this would be brought up. Not sure if there is a cause effectIf I may make one observation here ...
There appears to be 2 camps on this issue. One camp says pre-nup, keep everything seperate, etc. The other camp says no to the pre-nup, needs to be based on trust, community possessions, money, etc (whether that is one account or 7, both know what the other is doing and feel all should be open and transparent).
The question is, which fact drives the other ... a successful marriage breeds the trust and desire to keep things in common. Of the keeping of things in common breeds a successful marriage? And vice-versa for the other camp.