Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

This_lil_fishy

Master Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jul 23, 2008
Messages
841
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

I guess I ought to warn this guy not to take his rig to Ontario... see pics...

LOLS, yeah, I'd give him two miles on any major highway here (if it actually could travel that far) before getting yanked! Specially on any long weekend, as they really ramp up police presence on the highways. They do whole sections of the news dedicated to the unsafe vehicle/loads that were impounded...can't seem to do much about violent crime though...no money in that I guess.


Ian
 

fsds123

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Apr 8, 2003
Messages
142
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

I am hoping you're a troll....seriously...

Second, over loading a vehicle is actually a chargeable offence, and depending on where you live, you will eventually get charged. Here in Ontario we have a special squad (we call them the green hornets as they have green and white markings instead of black and white like a cop) that will not only charge you, but impound your vehicle if they deem the vehicle is unsafe or overloaded....regardless of where your vehicle is registered (here or the US).

Even if you cannot not be criminally charged where you live, there's still the possibility of being sued in civil court for damages if you hurt someone becuase your trailer is overloaded. Also your insurance company may not honor your policy if you exceeded the safe rating of your tow vehicle in event of a collision or injury.

Ian

No troll here. Seriously, this has been discussed quite a bit on rv forums. Nobody has ever been sued for being over the vehicles recommended tow rating. Funny you mention Ontario. Ever heard of Can Am RV? They are based in Ontario and have set up cars and minivans for years with long and heavy trailers. They also test these set ups all the time and consistently cars and minivans handle the trailers better than suvs and trucks due to having better brakes and a lower center of gravity. I've posted the slalom results, and have read the braking results (can't seem to find them, but the cars did much better).

Here is a link to their website, check out the cars/airstream combos towards the bottom.

http://www.canamrv.ca/Home/Hidden/TestDrive/tabid/16700/Default.aspx
 

TilliamWe

Banned
Joined
Dec 21, 2004
Messages
6,579
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

So, then a Corvette would be the ultimate tow vehicle, right? Awesome brakes, long wheelbase (in relation to its overall length), and really low center of gravity. Sign me up!
 

fsds123

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Apr 8, 2003
Messages
142
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

So, then a Corvette would be the ultimate tow vehicle, right? Awesome brakes, long wheelbase (in relation to its overall length), and really low center of gravity. Sign me up!

Corvettes have 14 inch rotors, and 3500/350 trucks have 13 inch rotors, and weigh twice as much. A Corvette will stop from 60mph in 120 feet...a Ford F350 takes 170 feet to do the same.

If you are going to tow all the time or a lot of the time by all means get a truck, no argument there. If your vehicle is going to be used primarily to get groceries/commute/etc, and you want to take your boat to the lake a few times a month, why recommend a vehicle that is less safe the whole time you are not towing? (probably 99% of the time for most people)
 

sportsmanphil

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
257
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

Good lord man, you couldn't be more wrong or off track.

Engineers design things like bridges, airplanes, cars etc. A part of their wisdom is to base things like how many tons a bridge is designed to handle, how much cargo an airplane can lift and how much a vehicle can tow/carry safely. These ratings are posted in the vehicle plate in the drivers door and IT IS LAW!

When a SHP or DOT officer pulls you he has the right to weigh you right on the side of the road. They have done it before, will do it again. If you are over weight, you get a nice fine and will not be leaving with all your cargo. You also need to look up 'contributory negligence'. If you go towing 3000lbs with a car rated for 1000lbs (ie the PT cruiser) and you end up in an accident; even if its not your fault, you are negligent and can be sued.

Also, what is the PT going to do on an wet/sandy boat ramp with a 3000lb boat behind it? Or what happens when the PT hits the mountains pulling that 2500lb camper? We called the PT a pregnant neon when I was with Chrysler. Those cars couldn't hold 80k miles without puking an engine, what do you expect towing more than its own curb weight?

********

Now let me educate you on vehicle brakes............you need it.

Lets take two vehicles. Lane 1 a PT cruiser and lane 2 is a Chevrolet Silverado. Each vehicle has a 3500lb trailer bolted to the hitch.

The PT weighs 3070 lbs
The Silverado's curb weight is 5735lbs

These vehicles are pulling the 3500lb trailers at 50 mph when all hell breaks loose! Both drivers stomp the brake to the floor.

There are only three things that matter when it comes to stopping the weight. It all sums up to drag coefficient (look it up)

1. How much contact do you have with the pavement? (4 tires)

2. How much weight do you have holding those tires down to the road?

With the PT, you have the nail trying to drive the hammer. The Silverado has almost twice the weight of the PT holding the tires to the road, where all your drag coefficient is being created.

I could type 2 pages on brake designs, but we need to start you out with baby steps it seems.

I'm not even going to try to explain the differences between Vette brakes vs. Suburban brakes. :rolleyes:
 

fsds123

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Apr 8, 2003
Messages
142
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

Good lord man, you couldn't be more wrong or off track.

Engineers design things like bridges, airplanes, cars etc. A part of their wisdom is to base things like how many tons a bridge is designed to handle, how much cargo an airplane can lift and how much a vehicle can tow/carry safely. These ratings are posted in the vehicle plate in the drivers door and IT IS LAW!

When a SHP or DOT officer pulls you he has the right to weigh you right on the side of the road. They have done it before, will do it again. If you are over weight, you get a nice fine and will not be leaving with all your cargo. You also need to look up 'contributory negligence'. If you go towing 3000lbs with a car rated for 1000lbs (ie the PT cruiser) and you end up in an accident; even if its not your fault, you are negligent and can be sued.

Also, what is the PT going to do on an wet/sandy boat ramp with a 3000lb boat behind it? Or what happens when the PT hits the mountains pulling that 2500lb camper? We called the PT a pregnant neon when I was with Chrysler. Those cars couldn't hold 80k miles without puking an engine, what do you expect towing more than its own curb weight?

********

Now let me educate you on vehicle brakes............you need it.

Lets take two vehicles. Lane 1 a PT cruiser and lane 2 is a Chevrolet Silverado. Each vehicle has a 3500lb trailer bolted to the hitch.

The PT weighs 3070 lbs
The Silverado's curb weight is 5735lbs

These vehicles are pulling the 3500lb trailers at 50 mph when all hell breaks loose! Both drivers stomp the brake to the floor.

There are only three things that matter when it comes to stopping the weight. It all sums up to drag coefficient (look it up)

1. How much contact do you have with the pavement? (4 tires)

2. How much weight do you have holding those tires down to the road?

With the PT, you have the nail trying to drive the hammer. The Silverado has almost twice the weight of the PT holding the tires to the road, where all your drag coefficient is being created.

I could type 2 pages on brake designs, but we need to start you out with baby steps it seems.

I'm not even going to try to explain the differences between Vette brakes vs. Suburban brakes. :rolleyes:

Great, more "education" from someone that doesn't have a clue. What is posted on the door plate IS NOT LAW!!! Here is the law according to DOT.

"The following are the Federally mandated maximum weights for the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways and reasonable access thereto:
1) 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight
2) 20,000 pound single axle weight*
3) 34,000 pound tandem axle weight**
4) Bridge Formula***"

In case you don't believe me here is a link to an RV site where this is discussed in detail and numerous law enforcement officers have stated the same thing.

http://www.rv.net/forum/index.cfm/fuseaction/thread/tid/20577181.cfm

And FYI engineers do not decide what number goes on the door plates. Engineers decide what weight the vehicle can handle, and marketing/accounting decide what numbers to put on the plates to account for warranty claims and competitive advertisement. This has also been discussed and many auto engineers have chimed in and stated this to be the case.

And it has also been discussed many many times about being sued for being overweight in an accident. Not a single case has EVER been found. NOT ONE! If you can find an example, please post it here.

As to what the PT cruiser will do in the mountains...it has 220 hp and weighs half of an f350. If an f350 with 440hp can do it, so can a pt cruiser with 220. Same hp/weight ratio.

As for at the boat ramps, I'd rather have a FWD with limited slip and/or traction control than a RWD vehicle with an open differential. With the FWD you would have power going to both tires, with more power going to the wheel with the most traction. With a RWD vehicle with an open differential you get power to only one tire, the one with the least traction.

And finally...you say "there are only 3 things that matter when it comes to stopping the weight" and then only list 2 items...with one being DRAG coefficient, lol.

DRAG coefficient has NOTHING to do with brakes, Nothing! Do you mean the coefficient of friction of the tires? And there is definitely more to it than just the coefficient of friction. It is the weight that has to be stopped, which is why the Corvette takes 40% less distance to stop from 60 mph than an f350. Weight is not a good thing when it comes to braking efficiency. It is a BAD thing. Why do you think 18 wheelers take such a long time to stop?????

Please do type 2 pages on brake design...it should be highly amusing. And yes, please do explain the difference between Corvette and Suburban brakes that makes them suck when not towing, but magically makes them really good when you are towing.
 

sportsmanphil

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
257
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

#1,

Your weight ratings posted have to do with licensing, not towing laws. A man with a CDL who is licensed to tow 80,000lbs DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO TOW IT WITH A PT CRUISER!

according to the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION's website you MUST follow the manufacturers posted GVWR.

Here is the link and its to the DOT website, not some retarded RV site. Last I checked, the DOT is the law, not the local RV center. :rolleyes:

http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/Equipment/towing/if_you_have.htm

Here is a pretty PDF document the NHTSA and DOT have put together for women, children and you.

http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/Equipment/towing/Towing.pdf


Now, if you HONESTLY think the engineers design the vehicle and the ACCOUNTING!!!! department decides how much it can tow, then you need a CAT scan.

Here is another good read for you: and I quote

"The limitations are stamped on a "Tire and Loading Information" plate on the driver's side door frame. The ratings are an outgrowth of the 2000 Firestone tire recall, in which overloading was considered a factor that could cause tires to fail. Weight limits are important because automakers could claim they don't have responsibility for a component failure or a crash if a vehicle is overloaded. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says automakers can set the weight limit at whatever they deem appropriate.


****************

Your quote:

"As to what the PT cruiser will do in the mountains...it has 220 hp and weighs half of an f350. If an f350 with 440hp can do it, so can a pt cruiser with 220. Same hp/weight ratio."

OMF'in GOD! This is the dumbest thing I have read in a LOOONNNGGG time! SO what you are saying here is if we hooked the back of a PT cruiser to the back of an F350, we would have an even pull? A tire spinning standoff? How many F350 owners on this forum just pissed their pants laughing?

So Chrysler Engineers gave the PT cruiser a 1,000lb tow capacity and the Ford engineers gave the F350 up to 16,000lbs tow capacity, but according to you and your "rv buddies" they actually can pull the same? :rolleyes:

Further more, horsepower has nothing to do with getting that vehicle/trailer moving, its all about the torque.


*******

Your quote:

"As for at the boat ramps, I'd rather have a FWD with limited slip and/or traction control than a RWD vehicle with an open differential. With the FWD you would have power going to both tires, with more power going to the wheel with the most traction. With a RWD vehicle with an open differential you get power to only one tire, the one with the least traction."

First off, do you know the difference between a limited slip, posi traction, traction control and a locking diff? 90% of all FWD passenger cars have no traction device with exception of their version of a traction control, which only reduces spinning by way of "drive by wire". It does not increase traction, it just helps to prevent a spinning tire. In my extensive automotive history I know of NO passenger FWD vehicle with a posi or limited slip diff. I know for a fact that no passenger vehicle with FWD has ever been available with a locking diff (automatic or manual)

Ever played on a seasaw? Do you know what a fulcrum is?

If you take a PT cruiser and place a boat on the rear, give it a 200lb tongue weight and 3000lb trailer weight. Back it down a boat ramp. The boat weight and tongue weight presses down on the rear, LIFTING the front where all the traction would be.


Make that a RWD vehicle and the increase in tongue weight HELPS to gain traction, by forcing the rear driven tires down more.

THIS is why 5th wheels are the highest tow capacity on the road (passenger vehicle). It places the tongue weight directly over the axle. Hard to put a 5th wheel on the hood of a PT cruiser! :rolleyes:


***********


Your quote:

"DRAG coefficient has NOTHING to do with brakes, Nothing! Do you mean the coefficient of friction of the tires? And there is definitely more to it than just the coefficient of friction. It is the weight that has to be stopped, which is why the Corvette takes 40% less distance to stop from 60 mph than an f350. Weight is not a good thing when it comes to braking efficiency. It is a BAD thing. Why do you think 18 wheelers take such a long time to stop?????"


I incorrectly typed drag coefficient instead of coefficient of friction; however the principal is correct. The coefficient of friction of the tow vehicle is limited by the tire contact to the pavement and the force applied (vehicle weight) once you exceed that, you have lost your friction or ability to stop the weight. The friction cofficient of a PT cruiser under braking is far less than the full size truck. Same reason to your example, why do you think an 18 wheeler has 18 wheels?

A standard vehicle has approx 70% of its braking power on the front tires and the remaining 30% on the rear. The reason for this is because there is more weight in the front and the weight of the vehicle transfers forward under heavy braking. Were back to friction coefficient, more ability for the front tires to assist in the stopping as it has more force holding them down.

Trucks and SUV's are designed in many ways to handle more weight rather that be cargo or towing. Trucks and SUV's have load sensing proportioning valves and have for YEARS! Some are manual, a rod connecting the rear axle to the valve on the frame and some work more like a bubble level, senses the tilt of the vehicle.

When a truck or SUV is loaded with cargo or a trailer, the valve adjusts applying MORE brake ability to the rear wheels, because they have more weight holding them to the pavement and therefore can help more.

Depending on which generation, and which package Vette, the brake materials are much different from any standard truck/SUV. Vette's can have anything from Carbon rotors to magnesium calipers.

Whats important is that they have huge vents and thin rotor walls! Where a truck has average vents and THICK rotor walls.

Vette brakes are designed to stop its own weight and fast from higher speeds. They are designed to only get but so hot because of maximum ventilation. Some Vette's actually have ducts running from the front airdam to the rotors to keep them cool. If that same vette was pulling 2500lbs and tried to stop at the same rate, they would overheat quickly causing the pads to gas.

A truck/SUV handles the heat differently. With thick rotor walls made of steel, it can absorb the heat and cool on a more average speed. Quick cooling causes warped rotors (not excessive heat) Trucks and SUV's have brakes designed to run hotter for longer periods of time.

In addition, Trucks and SUV's have transmissions designed to assist and use engine back pressure to reduce the speed of the towing vehicle. I have YET to to this day find a Vette with a "tow/Haul" button on the shifter!

To compare the brakes on a Vette vs any Truck/SUV is like comparing apples to roof shingles. The only thing similar about them is that they are designed to stop a vehicle.
 

bese6197

Cadet
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
18
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

How important is wheel base on a tow vehicle? Here is my scenario. I currently tow my +-3500# set up with an old Silhouette Minivan with tow package. Other than the lack of horsepower for deadstop takeoffs and 4wd on slippery ramps or hard turns, it tows very respectible considering it is a car chasis. The van is heavy and has a 120 inch wheelbase so the tail doesn't wag the dog but it is way underpowered with a small v6. That said every trip I take is a gift since the tranny has got to give out sooner or later so I am wanting to upgrade to a used mid sized SUV. I am partial to the Trailblazer/Envoy because the depreciation is just huge and you can get a lot of truck for a little money and the interiors are nice albeit a generation outdated, I think. So a standard length trailblazer is 113 inches which is a lot shorter than the van but it has a lot more power and of course 4wd. I don't think I want the extended Trailblazer because they are scarce and hence expensive and a lot longer than the van in the garage (plus my wife likes to hit stuff). How much of a difference will 7 inches in wheelbase make? Will the large torque and HP increase offset the shorter wheelbase or will the tail wag the dog?

Any body on frame SUV should tow your rig very well. I would steer clear of the CUV FWD based unibody vehicles that don't have the structure to mount a heavy duty hitch to, and therefore generally have a lower tow rating ( more similar to your van). I have the same van with a much lighter load, but I still have a problem with traction with my boat unloading the front tires during a retreival. A TB/Envoy will load your primary drive wheels and should give you some better traction. I would look for one with a G80 option, which is a mechanical locking rear differential. Should help your traction also. Thats my 2cents if you care.
 

TilliamWe

Banned
Joined
Dec 21, 2004
Messages
6,579
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

Just cause you tow a camper doesn't mean you know anything.


Phil, way back on page one, I summed fsds up with this nice little nugget of knowledge. I appreciate you trying to point out the science to him, but he's never gonna get it or believe it. you are wasting your typing fingers. :)
If jkust listens to this guy, then he deserves what happens. But the fact that jkust was asking about a Trailblazer, already lets us know he's smarter than this.
 

sportsmanphil

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
257
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

Your right, I shouldnt have gotten sucked into that but I did. :p
 

fsds123

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Apr 8, 2003
Messages
142
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

#1,

Your weight ratings posted have to do with licensing, not towing laws. A man with a CDL who is licensed to tow 80,000lbs DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO TOW IT WITH A PT CRUISER!

according to the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION's website you MUST follow the manufacturers posted GVWR.

Here is the link and its to the DOT website, not some retarded RV site. Last I checked, the DOT is the law, not the local RV center. :rolleyes:

Nice of you to post a pamphlet instead of an actual law. It says you must do lots of things, none of which are laws. States control what is and what is not legal. Here is a link for each state. BTW, DOT primarily deals with commercial towing, not private towing.

//www.towingworld.com/articles/TowingLaws.htm

You said

"Now, if you HONESTLY think the engineers design the vehicle and the ACCOUNTING!!!! department decides how much it can tow, then you need a CAT scan."

That is not what I said at all. What I said is engineers decide what the vehicle is capable of, and accounting/marketing decide what is cost effective to rate the vehicle at and still make a profit without loosing too much to warranty claims etc. Can you honestly tell me you have talked to an automotive engineer that said the vehicle can tow x amount and will implode by going over by 1 pound? I have had discussions with automotive engineers, and yes, vehicles are rated lower for just that reason.

You said:
"The limitations are stamped on a "Tire and Loading Information" plate on the driver's side door frame. The ratings are an outgrowth of the 2000 Firestone tire recall, in which overloading was considered a factor that could cause tires to fail. Weight limits are important because automakers could claim they don't have responsibility for a component failure or a crash if a vehicle is overloaded. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says automakers can set the weight limit at whatever they deem appropriate."

I checked the quote and it only has to do with automaker liability. I.E. if you overload the tires the car manufacturer is not liable for damages. Wow, no kidding. What is the relevance here again?

In your response to:
"As to what the PT cruiser will do in the mountains...it has 220 hp and weighs half of an f350. If an f350 with 440hp can do it, so can a pt cruiser with 220. Same hp/weight ratio."

You said:
"OMF'in GOD! This is the dumbest thing I have read in a LOOONNNGGG time! SO what you are saying here is if we hooked the back of a PT cruiser to the back of an F350, we would have an even pull? A tire spinning standoff? How many F350 owners on this forum just pissed their pants laughing?"

No offense, but that is retarded and not at all what I am saying. Hey, how about we hook the back of an F350 to a zero hp tree and have a tire spinning standoff? Does the tree now have the same hp/weight ratio as the F350? By all means continue to distort the facts and keep from posting anything relevant.

you said:

"First off, do you know the difference between a limited slip, posi traction, traction control and a locking diff? 90% of all FWD passenger cars have no traction device with exception of their version of a traction control, which only reduces spinning by way of "drive by wire". It does not increase traction, it just helps to prevent a spinning tire. In my extensive automotive history I know of NO passenger FWD vehicle with a posi or limited slip diff. I know for a fact that no passenger vehicle with FWD has ever been available with a locking diff (automatic or manual)"

FYI almost all modern cars with FWD have traction control. I guess your extensive automotive history is not so extensive. If a modern FWD car has ABS, odds are very good it also has traction control. I know for a fact all VW's have traction control. My Sienna minivan has traction control,as does my brothers Honda Odyssey. Nissan sentras were available with limited slip diffs, as as were R32 GTI's. And yes, it does increase traction. When the spinning wheel is prevented from spinning, guess where the power goes? To the NON spinning wheel.

As for pulling a boat on a ramp..it depends. A single rear wheel spinning in the water is not better than 2 wheels getting traction out of the water.


Your braking theory does not hold water.
First, you said:

"Trucks and SUV's have load sensing proportioning valves and have for YEARS!"

Guess what, every single car I have owned, including a 1983 VW Rabbit, have had a load sensing proportioning valve. Don't believe me? Look the part up at any online car website like autozone etc.

Also, Corvette rotors are both thicker and bigger than f350 brakes. The kinetic energy of a Corvette doing 180mph is the same as a f350 towing 23,000 lbs at 65 mph. The rotors don't know what vehicle they are on, and the entire point of the rotors is to convert the kinetic energy to heat, and then get rid of the heat as quickly as possible. Saying truck rotors are designed to hold the heat longer and release it slowly is total BS

So is your idea that a heavier vehicle will have a higher coefficient of friction and thus can stop quicker. Why not just add a bunch of weight to all vehicles to decrease their stopping distance?
 

sportsmanphil

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
257
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

Everything you have typed as been so asinine, I have chose not to waste another minute of my life dealing with it. As a matter of a fact, i'd rather go to the bathroom, take a dump and read the back of a shampoo bottle than read what ever you just typed above^^^

I wish you and your PT Cruiser the best. ;)
 

fsds123

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Apr 8, 2003
Messages
142
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

Everything you have typed as been so asinine, I have chose not to waste another minute of my life dealing with it. As a matter of a fact, i'd rather go to the bathroom, take a dump and read the back of a shampoo bottle than read what ever you just typed above^^^

Does the back of the shampoo bottle tell you to wash, rinse and REPEAT? Do you think that is a law also? Nice way to dodge the issue.
 

jkust

Rear Admiral
Joined
Aug 2, 2008
Messages
4,942
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

Ok this thread went all over the place but I just got back from buying my new rig. I picked up a very nice Buick Rainier which is a luxury version of the Trailblazer/Envoy/Bravada/9-7x/Ascender. I got the 5.3 V8 AWD and pretty much everything else comes standard inclucing the G80 locking rear differential. It has the sun/moon roof, heated leather and just about everything you can think of and you can even access the internet. It can tow 6500 lbs so I can finally retire my minivan from tow duty. Anyway thank you all for your input.

-Jason
 

windsors03cobra

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
1,191
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

^^ Sweet man that sounds like a really nice rig, great interiors on the one you got, about the best you could get on that mega badge engineered SUV.

The 9-7X Aero 6.0 is pretty sweet as well.
 

ondarvr

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
11,527
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

Dang! I just found this thread and wanted to have some fun, but he already bought a tow rig.


I'm on my third Trailblazer and I tow a great deal, I've towed the same trailers with F150's, mini vans, cars, full sized Chevy PUs, Trailblazers, Dodge and Ford diesel trucks, Nissan PU?s??

The rig you got will work fine, have fun.
 

Thajeffski

Master Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
890
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

Just FYI, My camaro stopped much faster with a tow load behind it than the bronco does that I tow with now.
 

TilliamWe

Banned
Joined
Dec 21, 2004
Messages
6,579
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

Good choice, jkust. The mileage penalty for the 5.3 is basically non-existent. You got the best of both worlds.
 

Jeepster04

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jan 5, 2009
Messages
481
Re: Wheel base - Mini Van versus Trailblazer

Haha, this has been the best thread Ive read for awhile! Im towing our camper with our Corolla from now on! Bwhahaha
 
Top