I have a OMG Cobra 3.0 I have been running lower grade gas and I am wondering if I will see better results if I switch to high grade gas and if the improvement would be worth it? Thanks in advance for everyones input
that's why I ask this question I stumbled across the manual having two settings for tune up one states using RON 93 would be 4deg BTDC and running RON 90 it would be 1deg ATDC. I have been running 87 in it.Howdy,
In a word, NO. You will not see an improvement.
Now having said that, Some engines of the "past" had different (couple degrees advanced) ignition timing settings for higher octane fuels. When you advance timing on any engine, you can see incremental increases in HP (on a DYNO)
A LOT of 80's and 90's OMC (GM and Ford) engines had different fuel grade/timing settings. (8 degrees vs 10 BTDC etc)
You won't see a difference in operation though.
In general, different grade gasolines DO NOT increase performance in ANY engine. (that's an old wives tale promoted by the Petro advertising industry for many years)
Some very high HP engines with very high compression and ignition advance CANNOT run on low octane fuel because of detonation which WILL destroy them under load quickly.
It's not the fuel that increases the power, it's the high compression and (advanced) ignition timing (which REQUIRES the higher octane fuel)
High octane fuel has the same energy content (BTU/gallon, KCAL/Ltr) as low octane fuel.
Cheers,
Rick
that's why I ask this question I stumbled across the manual having two settings for tune up one states using RON 93 would be 4deg BTDC and running RON 90 it would be 1deg ATDC. I have been running 87 in it.
United States: in the US octane rating is displayed in AKI. In the Rocky Mountain (high elevation) states, 85 AKI (90 RON) is the minimum octane, and 91 AKI (95 RON) is the maximum octane available in fuel[SUP][citation needed][/SUP]. The reason for this is that in higher-elevation areas, a typical naturally aspirated engine draws in less air mass per cycle because of the reduced density of the atmosphere. This directly translates to less fuel and reduced absolute compression in the cylinder, therefore deterring knock. It is safe to fill a carbureted car that normally takes 87 AKI fuel at sea level with 85 AKI fuel in the mountains, but at sea level the fuel may cause damage to the engine. A disadvantage to this strategy is that most turbocharged vehicles are unable to produce full power, even when using the "premium" 91 AKI fuel. In some east coast states, up to 94 AKI (98 RON) is available.[SUP][26][/SUP] As of January, 2011, over 40 states and a total of over 2500 stations offer ethanol-based E-85 fuel with 105 AKI.[SUP][27][/SUP] Often, filling stations near US racing tracks will offer higher octane levels such as 100 AKI[SUP][citation needed][/SUP].
(that's an old wives tale promoted by the Petro advertising industry for many years)
C'mon...really? I just CAN'T believe "big oil" would lie to us!:laugh:
Say it isn't so...
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"There's a sucker born every minute" is a phrase often credited to P. T. Barnum (1810–1891), an American showman. Though this phrase is often credited to Barnum, it was actually spoken by a man by the name of David Hannum, who was criticizing both Barnum and his customers.
I don't have much to add to the discussion, but just got a laugh outta' this. I now have a new descriptor to my driveline, "I have an OMG Stringer!"I have a OMG Cobra 3.0...
In my area the higher octane fuel is 100% gas unlike the ethanol blend lower ones. I do know that the carbs / fuel systems will not like the alcohol content. Bad on seals gaskets Etc.
Also Known as "AKI" (Anti Knock Index)The method of rating Octane must be taken into consideration as HT and others have mentioned. The RON method is "Research Only Number" used worldwide, except of course in the US. Most ratings in the US are (R+M)/2 which is an average of RON and "MOTOR" method (where an actual engine of known configuration is used to test in a lab).
Most marine engine callout stickers and manuals will state both. Not everyone who reads that understands the difference, and the RON method seems to be first in line in most cases and that has propogated many untruths about what any given marine engine needs for octane....................................
Using higher octane when not called for can leave byproducts in the sparkplug and combustion chamber and the engine can actually lose performance. Advancing timing may help but other factors such as compression ratio and duty cycle will keep the higher octane from being a performance booster in most engines that only require the lower octane fuel.
ELIMINATE SPARK PLUG LEAD FOULING!
Since the introduction of 100LL as the main fuel for low-compression engines, Alcor has been a leader in providing pilots a fuel treatment that eliminates lead before it can cause fouling. TCP is the only FAA approved product of its kind. A simple one-shot treatment with every fill-up prevents lead build-up on spark plugs and valves (recommended dosage is 1 oz. of TCP for every 10 gallons of leaded fuel).
I must protest the use of "high grade" and "low grade" terminology. The fuel quality is the same, only the octane rating makes them different. Most refining methods "set" the octane last.
Yes, 10% Ethanol lowers the BTU content approx 3% or so.....it's almost insignificant.I will just throw this out there...Ethanol lowers the BTU content