Verdict in on M Jackson

B

Barlow

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Mar 11, 2003
Messages
1,794
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

Shall We Get A Rope? <br /><br />
posted January 31, 2005<br />Originally posted by Barlow:<br /><br /> well hate to throw a knife to the guy but what the livin tarnations are these kids parents thinkin' in the first place??<br /><br />look at the truth of the matter!!<br /><br />If it was an actual illegal sexual acusition .. there wouldn't have been anything settled out of court in the last run at his pocket book. Come on guys, look at the facts!.. this would've been a crime against society and the previous kids parents and attouneys would've had no say in the matter.. just judge/DA/jury and social services have a say in this kinda crap.<br /><br />I'm not defending this freak but Jesus H Criminie .. what were the parents of these kids doing when they subjected their kids to contact with the freak?!?!?<br /><br />Tell ya what I'm thinkin' .." Hey, he paid those folks a few million to keep quiet .. Hell, I could use a new car and house.".. " HEY!, Junior .. Get in the car!! we're going to go see Micheal Jackson!" :rolleyes: <br /><br /><br />If anything or anybody deserves the noose its the damn parents for subjecting their kids to this crap and then taking advantage of a situation.<br /><br />COW PIES!
Click to expand...
posted January 31, 2005<br /> what a blow job this is turning out to be!! ... <br /><br />If it is in-fact, false (god only knows btw) Micheal should counter sue these damn ignorants for everything and their shoe strings!!!! Plus, have their kids taken away from them for being un-fit as a parents and fear of future abusive behavior!! <br />
Click to expand...
I'm still standing on solid ground it looks like.. and I've watched and read 0% of any of it since the get go.. <br /><br />just another soap opera.. get a grip people :rolleyes:
 
JB

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

Say, Bob.<br /><br />He was accused. He had his day in court and 12 peers found him NOT GUILTY.<br /><br />What do you KNOW that wasn't presented in court?<br /><br />Or do you just WANT him punished because he doesn't fit your model?
 
O

OLDSPUD

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Nov 13, 2004
Messages
348
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

I'm with JB on this one. From everthing I heard about this trial, they didn't put a solid case against Mr. Jackson, poked holes in almost all the testimony against him. Call it what you want, his atty's did a better job than the state.<br />Kinda goes back to the theory, those who can't teach or work for the govn't, same with atty's. Every atty I've come across are better than any city or county atty. I'm sure there are some exceptions, but in most cases I believe this is the situation.<br />Ya, I think he is weird, did he moleste these kids? maybe, but where the hell were the parents?<br />Just my thoughts, don't really know any facts about the case, but must not have been many that held up.<br />Spud
 
C

CntrySngr

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
May 31, 2005
Messages
196
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

I agree with Ryan, JB and Spud here...the prosecutions case was not well assembled. They didn't do a good job of proving Michael was guilty, where as the defense did a great job proving that the kid and his family were guilty of "begging" for things from these stars.<br /><br />I just hope and pray if he IS guilty, he doesn't do it again...
 
Realgun

Realgun

Commander
Joined
Jul 31, 2003
Messages
2,484
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

"Dad can I go to Michaels house?" said son.<br />"Michael who?" Says Dad.<br />"Jackson,"said son.<br /><br />"Not in this lifetime!" said Dad.<br /><br />Good dad. :D <br /><br />He "might" be innocent but my kids innocence is not for sale.
 
POINTER94

POINTER94

Vice Admiral
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Messages
5,031
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

What is the last celebrity that was convicted of a real crime. Mike Tyson doesn't count, he is so stupid he was convicted on something he probably didn't do. Our society reveres celebrity and who pays the price is irrelavent to the 15 minutes of fame they recieve. Puke.<br /><br />He of course provided alcohol to minors, illegal, no doubt. Do not pass go, go directly to jail. Jacksons fingerprints and the childrens fingerprints were identified on porn. Giving porn to minors is illegal. Go to jail. This jury only deliberated 32hrs total before giving this sick sob a pass. That is like two hours per charge if you include the lesser inclusive charges. It takes a group of twelve 20 minutes just to organize a vote. Add in lunches and dinners and there was little or no debate. Sick.<br /><br />I hope their children are the next of the list to be molested. (Figure of speech) Wonder how they would react to that? My guess they would like it if they could get an autograph. What is wrong with these people? I can only conclude the system is broke. I will assure you that if anyone on this forum decided that sleeping with little boys, with porn in the same room, while serving them alcohol, and had the stones to defended it as totally natural, we would be looking through bars right now.<br /><br />Justice for sale............
 
M

mattttt25

Commander
Joined
Sep 29, 2002
Messages
2,661
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

the only person who deserves to be in jail is the kid's mother, for even putting her son in a position like that.<br /><br />jackson was tried and found not guilty. end of story. being or celebrity had nothing to do with the verdict. and race doesn't even present itself.
 
Bob_VT

Bob_VT

Moderator & Unofficial iBoats Historian
Staff member
Joined
May 19, 2001
Messages
26,034
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

JB yes, I agree with your statements... <br /><br />I guess I do hold a slight bit of predudice (not racial) for people who do not fit the mold.<br /><br />Bob
 
A

ae708

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jun 17, 2002
Messages
591
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

Did y'all ever really have a doubt....c'mon.
 
N

NYMINUTE

Captain
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
3,298
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

Can't Wait for the MJ tour this Fall. Going to be called the "Got Away With It" Tour. Maybe he will recruit a few catholic priests with similar passions, and luck to promote it. EeeeHeee, the little POS :mad:
 
JB

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

Yes, I had (and have) my doubts, but they are reasonable doubts.<br /><br />I think our system aspires to presumption of innocence unless proved guilty beyond that reasonable doubt.<br /><br />I think the system worked.
 
2

20/20

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
173
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

I just want to add something here for all those that feel Freak J is innocent. Most of the Jurors agree that MJ did have SICK relations with "little" boys, but they could not see enough proof in this case. Our justice system needs an overhaul, if your poor and act like MJ your sick, nasty, and/or weird and they throw away the key. If your rich and famous you are eccentric and you get a whole different set of rules{laws}. This case was just another show on TV but the real shame is that there was NO justice done and sooner or later this sick piece of trash will strike again. Public embarassment does not cure a child abuser, jail time, mental help or a bullet in the head would help.
 
N

NYMINUTE

Captain
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
3,298
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

Celebrities simply get the sweet end of the stick. Had this been any of us, and I am sure none of us would go there, the verdict would be GUILTY. But we can't sing and dance, or make tabloid headlines. NEVERLAND......Sure...Never????
 
L

Limited-Time

Vice Admiral
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
5,820
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

OJ, Robert Blake, and Michael Jackson: All staring in the "We're Free Tour" Opening this summer at a venue near you. What’s wrong with this picture?
 
C

cmyers_uk

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
May 4, 2004
Messages
760
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

You cant hang a guy because you feel he's guilty of a crime but have no evidence to back it up. You have a jury of 12 people who see both sides of the story fully they made a decision all 12 are not blind , deaf or dumb they must have had a reason to find him not guilty. <br /><br />I watched each day another American trial on Louise Woodward and when you start seeing some of the so called evidence that proved she did it any sane person would laugh it out of court.<br /><br />Some guilty people get away with it but its not just celebritys , it cops , the general public , but you have to prove somebody did it. <br /><br />I dont care anymore get the idiot of the news and charge the mother with being stupid surely nobody else will ever let their kid near him.
 
LadyFish

LadyFish

Admiral
Joined
Mar 18, 2003
Messages
6,894
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

In my opinion, this kind of the case is mostly based on anecdotal testimony and the prosecution failed to provide believable witnesses... Almost every "damaging" witness was carrying additional personal baggage that put their testimony into question in the jury's eyes - axes to grind... Especially the mother - She should have never been called by the prosecution...<br /><br />Right or wrong, that's the sad truth of this kind of criminal prosecution... Its all about marketing because there is very little hard evidence...<br /><br />The Jury is bound by the court to render a verdict on the merits of the case before them, not previous accusations... The sad truth is that the previous accusations were probably the true molestation cases and the ones that could have been prosecuted successfully, except for the fact that they were bought off...<br /><br />This particular case was weak from the beginning... Bad prosecution lost this case and probably stopped any possibility of a future prosecution - this case was under the spotlight and with a full aquital it will be almost impossible to bring a successful future case regardless of the merits of it.<br /><br />If Jackson is guilty then the prosecution fell short this time, not the jurers.<br /><br />Rest assured, where there is smoke there is fire ...<br /><br />...proving who set it is not always an easy thing to do.
 
SS MAYFLOAT

SS MAYFLOAT

Admiral
Joined
May 17, 2001
Messages
6,372
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

Blake, not guilty<br />OJ, not guilty<br />Jackson not guilty<br />Bryant not guilty<br />Martha Stewart---Guilty! I bet she wonders what went wrong.
 
JB

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

Good post, LF. :)
 
N

NYMINUTE

Captain
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
3,298
Re: Verdict in on M Jackson

In fairness to the system:<br />Mike Tyson....Guilty, or was he just too cheap to retain a great team. I suspect his failure to pay the young lady who accused him got him into that mess. Mike can't sing or dance worth a poop. Can't box either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top