"No CJY I don't want war"
You plan on causing Tehran to explode and smoke with words OMR?
"Nah Tom, You underestimate the profound shock a smolderin' Tehran, (5-20 fuel air explosives after a five day evacuation warning) would generate."
"Some MOABs, (large n' nasty fuel air explosives), maybe 5 or 10 could eliminate Tehran for starters."
Both statements are yours OMR. They appear to conflict with the "I don't want war," statement. [colour=blue]Yes, one could see that potential cornclusion, if you lack any critical thinking ability CJY. [/colour]Do you get that OMR?
[colour=blue]I understand the History of Homo Sapiens on this planet: CJY. When one power violates the territory of another and takes the other power's people hostage it is an act of war. This power: IRAN has prospered greatly with this tactic two times in modern history 1979 and again 2007. Indirectly through Hesbola they have prospered additional times with tactics of kidnap and suicide bombing. Every time this power ackomplishes an objective with this tactic, makes it much more likely the tactic will be used again and again both by this power and by other enemies of civilization. A strong semi public threat against a cherished enemy assett and deadline with absolute follow through would make the world a safer place for all of us, (even Barnum and Bailey). That's the history of Mankind. There are zero contrary examples. Agression is either crushed or it will flurish. If Tehran backed down under the threat, they would suffer a defeat and be less likely to try again. If they win, (higher oil prices more respect and fear), they will do it again maybe next time with nuclear weapons. I guess it is hard to understand this simple corncept; as ya need at least one functioning brain cell. [/colour]
Let me guess, you want us to attack while receiving no retaliation? Google "Iraq." Let me know how that worked for you.
[colour=blue]The threat would need to be staged so that the enemy understands first time one city second time five cities etc. It is possible Persia may not survive this WAR: CJY. WAR is not a bowl of cherries, but: when a hostile power takes hostages there needs to be a strong reaction, or history shows us that it only gets worse. Get that minor li'l point: CJY?[/colour]
"The Liberals work closely with our enemies CJY. The enemies are the reason things have not been easy: not President Bush."
Just more worthless rhetoric propaganda OMR, unless of course, you have proof. How about something viable this time OMR? Not just hot air OMR.
[colour=blue]How 'bout Nancy Pelosi goin' to Syria, (an enemy helping kill Americans in Iraq), during a time of war against the wishes of the person the Cornstitution specifically puts forth to conduct foriegn policy and command our military forces? Do you posess any critical thinkin' skills: CJY? How 'bout Tokyo Rossie O'Donnell taking the side of Iran? How 'bout Ted Kennedy claiming that GW Bush made up inteligence to take us to WAR under false pretences to in rich his oil buddies? (Stated in 2002 and carried world wide by all the media). How 'bout Richard '****' Durbin comparing our soldiers to Nazi Storm troopers? How 'bout John F Kerry comparing our soldiers in Iraq to terrorists? How 'bout the New York Times and Washington Post leaking valuable war time tactics during WAR? Have ya ever pondered why OBL's henchmen sound just like Democrats; or do you ponder at all: CJY?[/colour]
Funny, as I read all of your responses to my post OMR, the ones you were unable to respond to with rhetoric or name calling, you blamed on "smoke." How very conservative of you OMR.
Furthermore OMR, how is it you are so well aware that libs are knowledgable in the area of homosexuality? And I only ask because you speak of it several times on this thread OMR?
You are not friends with Mark Foley, are you OMR? How soon we forget and then point our guilt ridden fingers at others. Do you get that, OMR? I listed your use of the word below, OMR. Just in the event you have forgotten OMR.
"do know a lot about every aspect of homosexuality"
"what's important is we know about and totally accept homosexuality"
"(but: take comfort in our knowledge and acceptance of homosexuality). "
[colour=blue]My references are to the NEAs' strangle hold on public education. As a very effective pressure group that owns the Democratic party, they team up with the Gay Lesbean pressure group to encourage Democrats to dumb down children in public schools, with the objective of turning out good little victims without knowledge of history or critical thinking skills with the hope of them voting Democrat.[/colour]
OMR, the quotes below are yours also. "History" tells me when someone acts as though they are an expert and then begin to blog, they have just finished reading a book.
[colour=blue]CJY: stick to reading my words not my mind.[/colour]
Let me guess, it was something featuring Churchill and/or Chamberlain. Let me take another stab, Burying Caesar. As far as being a clown.....maybe. Weak tactic OMR, but as expected, none the less.
"That said: those of us aware of history"
"Most Americans can't name their vice President, and are very unaware of History"
"if Americans were aware of their own history"
"I suggest we all need to first: examine history of both Islam and Persia"
"Based on HISTORY"
"One thing I have learned in my studies"
"Some people, (most Americans) don't have much knowledge of history"
"Hope I'm wrong here but history cornvinces me I'm not"
"History, (not just American history but the history of the human species is"
"There aren't any examples from human history"
"I think you would recognize that history does not reward the "
"knowledge of history can and does save one"
"EVERY TIME IN THE HISTORY OF MAN"
"maybe they don't know history and the nature of aggressors"
No need to stand down, at least for my sake. I think I can handle myself.
[colour=blue]Why don't you get untra sensative n' label me a racist or something hot like that CJY?:}:}:}:} JR[/colour]
'(
