Lineup looks OK but lowering the engine an inch would help. Just commenting on pictures, not other responses on height. Also, I don't detect any "cupping" in the SS prop.....which are usually cupped.....each prop design determines just how much cupping is right for that design.....lots of cup is not necessarily correct in the prop design......per comments from prop design folks. Cupping helps to prevent blow out and is a must for high mounted engines to maintain prop grip close to the surface.Here are the requested pics. I’m uploading from my phone so hope they turn out ok. Took one extra photo to show how the plate lines up with the transom pretty spot on.
Raising the motor can give more speed as long as it's not raised too far. Others are wondering if yours is raised too far and loosing bite as it nears the top end.So I actually previously had the Mercury 1150 mounted too low. I had the AV plate about 1.5" below the hull. This was because I just set the outboard on the top of the transom and bolted it down, and didn't think about where the AV plate aligned. But I also had a problem with the lip of the transom being a radius creating spray. So in the end it's hard to tell much from that experience because I don't know if my problems were due more to the outboard mounting or the transom lip.
Thread
Anyways now the transom lip is fixed. And the mounting height is theoretically correct. I don't have any spray. And the hole shot is fantastic. The plate above the AV plate is fully out of the water, deflecting spray downward toward the AV. So the AV is out of the main body of water, but is covered in a shower of water from the plate above. Hope that makes sense.
BTW the prop is not stainless, if that's what you meant.
I'm confused why I would want to lower the outboard, looking at this graphic, it seems counterintuitive to what I want (more speed?)
No doubt, the higher you can get the LU out of the water the lower the drag and higher the speed and RPMs. Just how high depends on a lot of factors and mainly selecting a prop that runs shallow and doesn't blow out. Without that you are relieving yourself into the wind......ugh....grin.So I actually previously had the Mercury 1150 mounted too low. I had the AV plate about 1.5" below the hull. This was because I just set the outboard on the top of the transom and bolted it down, and didn't think about where the AV plate aligned. But I also had a problem with the lip of the transom being a radius creating spray. So in the end it's hard to tell much from that experience because I don't know if my problems were due more to the outboard mounting or the transom lip.
Thread
Anyways now the transom lip is fixed. And the mounting height is theoretically correct. I don't have any spray. And the hole shot is fantastic. The plate above the AV plate is fully out of the water, deflecting spray downward toward the AV. So the AV is out of the main body of water, but is covered in a shower of water from the plate above. Hope that makes sense.
BTW the prop is not stainless, if that's what you meant.
I'm confused why I would want to lower the outboard, looking at this graphic, it seems counterintuitive to what I want (more speed?)
Er ah Antiventilation Plate. Cavitation is most prominent on propeller tips and the more dings the worse it is. Antiventilation is the purpose of the plate above the prop.....reduces the propeller's ability to suck surface air into the slipstream and cause ventilation....air where water should be.maybe he's one of the few who could actually benefit from a cavitation plate device.....
lol..Er ah Antiventilation Plate. Cavitation is most prominent on propeller tips and the more dings the worse it is. Antiventilation is the purpose of the plate above the prop.....reduces the propeller's ability to suck surface air into the slipstream and cause ventilation....air where water should be.
I am guilty of the misnomer. All my life it was the AC plate. Join this forum and get SMACKED.........I am now a convert.
Well, obviously I picked it up in my limited boating circles when a teen. I see the misnomer is widespread. Course, people who write articles for the news media don't necessarily know what they are talking about either. Case in point the word "re-iterate". it has to be said and repeated (iterated) to qualify for being re-iterated. Course to use the wrong word sounds like you know what you are talking about.lol..
you're right....and I know the difference....
but, eh, I'm not alone...including the navy (see last one)
After so many years of that beauty sitting on a trailer, could your hull possibly have some deformation, hook or rocker? Good luck!Seems like after all this discussion we are still pretty much stumped on what the source of the problem is.
You need to remove the prop to see whether or not the hub has slipped, monitoring YOUR scribe line connecting the splined hub to the outer barrel.I believe if you zoom in on the dead on prop pic, you can see the hub, it is a light grey color, and it doesn't appear to have ever slipped. The edges are nice and sharp.