Holy Dynamic Duo Gibletts! That is hysterical! Is it real or just a very good fake? At any rate, it makes for some super silly innuendo.Originally posted by gibletts:<br /> I dont know how many of you ever got \ watched the kids TV show "rainbow" but heres a classic transcript from an episode. <br /><br /> http://rainbow.arch.scriptmania.com/rainbow_tv_episode.html
Just one of the many techniques used by the Liberals, BCP. Taint nothin new here. When their agenda has been exposed for what it is, they cannot come out and admit it. Hardly anyone would stand for it. Sooooooooo, the only thing to do is to vilify the messenger. <br /><br />That technique, I might add, has carried right down to the rank and file.Originally posted by Bearcat Powered:<br /> What I want to know is why is the focus on Dobson and not the idiot writers who deliberately took him out of context. They are nothing more than cheap liars trying any way they can to get more readers. Nothing but cheap wh*res in my opinion.
On the contrary WBW, your example is irrelevant. While nobody but the criminally insane would seriously consider doing something as wacked out as dropping an anvil on your head, there are many who may be influenced by suggestion. In your anvil example, even young children can appreciate that an anvil will do serious and permanent injury regardless of the fact that it doesn't appear to in the cartoon.<br /><br />The subject discussed here is the employment of a subtle and underhanded methodology. Dobson's point is the characters are being used to shape the minds of children who are too innocent to realize what is really going on. There is no way to determine how many, or who, have been or will be affected by actions like this.<br /><br />I assert that many, possibly yourself included, have been, and, would again be among the first to cry foul if propaganda efforts by the government employed these same techniques.Originally posted by WillyBWright:<br />But I think he's way overestimating the effect the silliness of a cartoon has on us. I mean it's not like I'm going around dropping Anvils on people now that I'm an adult after repeated exposure to Roadrunner cartoons as a child.
Maybe not, but c'mon, tell us about the time you drew a cave door on the wall & your sister ran headlong into it & knocked herself out...<br /><br />Originally posted by WillyBWright:<br /> I mean it's not like I'm going around dropping Anvils on people now that I'm an adult after repeated exposure to Roadrunner cartoons as a child.
Are we talking sexual molestation or just molestation?If sexual ,the numbers seem to depend on the source.In any case ,I personally would hardly classify one as straight(hetrosexual)if they fancied sexual molestation of children.I call them (its).Originally posted by KenImpZoom:<br /> <br /> They are less apt to molest children than straights