Re: NFL - Week 3
25 minutes ago the NFL released a statement saying that pass interference on Tate should have been called and the game should have been over. They also pointed out that "joint control" in the endzone can be, and was reviewed. They didn't have enough video proof to overturn the call.
As a non-interested party, it was a tough call. Sure the defender has two hands on it all the time, but Tate's one hand was there at the beginning, and his second hand got there a split second later. It didn't really look like joint possession to me at first, but if Tate didn't also have possesion of it, why wasn't the defender able to rip it out of his hands as he turned, tucked and fell to the ground? That proves to me that Tate had a pretty strong grip on it the whole time. "Joint Possession"?
25 minutes ago the NFL released a statement saying that pass interference on Tate should have been called and the game should have been over. They also pointed out that "joint control" in the endzone can be, and was reviewed. They didn't have enough video proof to overturn the call.
As a non-interested party, it was a tough call. Sure the defender has two hands on it all the time, but Tate's one hand was there at the beginning, and his second hand got there a split second later. It didn't really look like joint possession to me at first, but if Tate didn't also have possesion of it, why wasn't the defender able to rip it out of his hands as he turned, tucked and fell to the ground? That proves to me that Tate had a pretty strong grip on it the whole time. "Joint Possession"?