Mercury Carbureted vs Fuel injection timeline

Matt L

Recruit
Joined
Jul 17, 2021
Messages
1
I'm wondering when Mercury began producing fuel injection outboards. As a fisherman, I try to be as environmentally conscious about the waterways and marine environments. I hope to do my part to keep the fishing as good as possible for as long as possible. In my research, i've come to learn that 2stroke outboards have a pretty nasty history of passing 20-30% of fuel mix into the water. Besides it being inefficient, I'd rather not be dumping that stuff into my favorite fishing spots. I know most all manufactures began adjusting their design to improve this with EFI, DFI, and 4 Strokes. For instance, I'm looking at a 2001 Nitro with a Merc 90 Tracker Mercury. Does anyone know if this would fall under those carbureted engines or fuel injection engines? I dont know the timelines on these.
 

matt167

Rear Admiral
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
4,150
That 20-30% would be in the late 50's to early 60's where you could see an oil slick when you started it cold on some motors. Many bypassed raw gas to the exhaust on startup, but some were worse than others. I have a 1966 Johnson Super Seahorse 40hp ( Big Twin ) which isn't that bad.

A Tracker 90 of that era, would be a carburated motor, as it was originally branded for Tracker boats and manufactured to a price point. A couple years older than that, it would actually be a Force engine... But Carb vs EFI has nothing to do with dumping gas. The engine design and how the fuel is scavenged is where the magic is I do not know Mercury well enough to know the differences... If you are really worried, only look at 4 strokes
 

roscoe

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Oct 30, 2002
Messages
21,739
And even with a 4 stroke, the exhaust chemical byproducts are dumped into the lake. Clearly not as much, but would you consider pumping your lawnmower exhaust through your kitchen faucet?

It is what it is.
The oil came from the earth and is returned to the earth.
 

dingbat

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 20, 2001
Messages
16,074
That 20-30% would be in the late 50's to early 60's where you could see an oil slick when you started it cold on some motors.
Not just old. All carbureted 2 strokes spew fuel and oil. It wasn’t until the advent of DI 2 strokes that the issue was addressed.

You ought to see the trail of oil and fuel running down the drive after running my 1997 200 hp after 5-10 minutes.
 

matt167

Rear Admiral
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
4,150
Not just old. All carbureted 2 strokes spew fuel and oil. It wasn’t until the advent of DI 2 strokes that the issue was addressed.

You ought to see the trail of oil and fuel running down the drive after running my 1997 200 hp after 5-10 minutes.
I know they still pollute, but not like the old ones which would just dump fuel at idle Like I said, even my Big twin 40 isn't terrible for a 55 year old motor.. 4 stroke for people concerned about it
 

dingbat

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 20, 2001
Messages
16,074
Your comparing a 2 cylinder 40 to a 6 cylinder 200.

Your 40 might not be too bad, but look at the oil/fuel stain mine left from idling for less than 5 minutes.

This is the residue after two rain storms
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    4.3 MB · Views: 14

reelfishin

Captain
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
3,047
I think it was less of a concern back then in many ways, in the 40's and 50's, there were far less boats on the water than there are today. I see the difference in only the past 25 or so years, waterways which were pretty quiet during the week are now jam packed with boats and jetskis all summer long, every day of the week. I think the environment could handle the handful of boats back in the day, but now if they were all older 25:1 mix two strokes not much would be alive in the water these days. But we also have cut back on other pollution as well these days, We don't see nearly as much farm runoff, there's far less waste dumping going on, and larger boats can no longer flush to sea to clear their waste tanks. Even during my time I can remember guys still changing oil in larger boats and dumping oil into the bilge to be pumped out while out on the water the next day. It was somewhat common practice. Just the same i remember farmers collecting drain oil to oil down their driveways and roads to keep dust down. Hundreds of gallons of drain oil being dumped just feet away from the food you ate. I remember a few shops i worked at early on who would just sling waste oil out onto the parking area saying it 'rejuvenated' the asphalt. Some just dug a pit and dumped the oil outback.

So in the grand scheme of things these days, we're far easier on the environment than we can ever imagine these days. Now their talking about not letting us wash our cars at home because it washes 'road dirt' and oil from the chassis onto the ground or down the sewer.
Yet we spray roundup like its water on everything and pesticides by the gallon and don't give it much thought. The guy next door to me goes through a gallon of round-up every week, he coats his driveway, walkway, curb, and all around his house with the stuff weekly. he buys Sevin by the case for his flowers, and sprays his food garden with Preen and every sort of pesticide he can find. Yet he complains if my truck leaves a drip of oil in the street or in my driveway. He rushes over to clean it up. His son-in-law has a 30 year old truck that leaks oil, he was there the other day and it left two 2" spots in the driveway, he was going off on how his truck pollutes the earth. 5 minutes after the guy left, the old man is out there with a scrub brush and a gallon of kerosene and gas scrubbing the stain and hosing if off down the street. He likely dumped two gallons of kero and gas on that oil spot.

In comparison, when you think how much or how little older two strokes actually do pollute, and the type of pollution they make, its a pretty minor issue. I would also think that modern two stroke oils also are made with the whole pollution issue in mind. They likely do not linger in the water nearly as long as say a 24:1 mix of 30w motor oil and gas back in 1955.
From what I've been told over the years, the real pollution we need to worry about is heavy metals not the oil itself. I read an article that mainly was talking about chainsaw and power equipment with two stroke motors, they did extensive analysis of the exhaust and found that most of the oils were at least somewhat bio-degradable, but the heavy metals, minerals, and sulfur deposits were not. The main offender was particulates in the air. Much of that issue is solved when an outboard exhausts into the water but I've not read a study showing what is actually in two stroke outboard exhaust. Especially since they use different two stroke oil formulas.
 

boatboss

Cadet
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
20
I've got a '99 Merc and according the the dealer, they built this motor from '99 to '02, after that the 40-50hp motors were EFI. I can't speak for other size motors, I'm only familiar with what I have here.
My 40hp came with the boat, got the whole thing dirt cheap at an estate liquidation sale so I wasn't too picky. The motor has been one of the worst motors I've ever owned. Constant carb issues. No wonder they only built it for four years.
 

Scott Danforth

Grumpy Vintage Moderator still playing with boats
Staff member
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
49,548
if you look at overall carbon footprint at end of life (the only place it matters), a 1948 chevrolet pickup truck pulling a 18 foot wooden boat with a 75hp merc TOP spewing gas has a smaller carbon foot print over 74 years than a 10 year old prius pulling a row boat. and that truck is still running after 74 years, while a prius needs new batteries and a battery controller after 100,000 miles and the plastic bits only last about 15

as far as chainsaws go. comparing my 1974 Craftsman (rebranded homelite) to my 6th Huskvarna/echo/etc over the past 20 years. that old homelite will out-cut anything and has only needed points adjusted and new chains (and two bar replacements). each of the other chain saws purchased in the past 20 years have had plastic bits that have failed, fuel systems that have failed, carbs that failed and bearings that failed. which one is greener. the well built, dirt simple 48 year old chainsaw that probably has cut in excess of 250 cords of wood, or the 6 chain saws that each cost more than twice what the craftsman cost dad back in 1974

so in the spirit of total carbon foot print, run that 90 vintage 2-stroke until it dies. it will out-live 3-4 4-stroke motors with minimal maintenance
 
Top