Re: I've never wilted
Originally posted by mrbscott19:<br /> too bad most people of the US and the world for that matter don't share your opinions."It's hard work", "we're making progress". Those are the only things Bush really said about Iraq. And he kept repeating it.
He really, really wanted this to sink-in, Scott. It's one of those things the left and the alphabet and foriegn media can't seem to get correct. It frustrates Americans with hopes of winning this thing, because the oposition is opposition, or propaganda designed to weeken coalition progress. They have done an extremely good job of cloaking true progress. The enemy does the rest, by detonating bombs and killing kids outside of newly-opening sewer plants. That act alone should tell you more than Bush or I EVER could....And yet, it doesn't, and so you get a broken record!<br />Just like the "87Billion dollars", WMD, "Passing the global test"--- He had to re-emphasize it over and over again. And what is it you take away from this, Scott???<br />
"Those are the only things he said about Iraq. And He kept repeating it".<br />
Originally posted by mrbscott19:<br /><br />he didn't have a plan, and neither did Kerry, but Bush's decisions are why we are where we're at in Iraq today, not Kerry's indecisions. I find it difficult to figure out how people can claim Bush is better than Kerry at anything, seeing as how Kerry has never had the chance to lead the country. Kinda like comparing a movie you've seen with one you haven't.
He
HAS (not 'had') a plan. He did his best to werk within the world body (UN) using the resolutions. But when France, Germany and other weenie-republics withheld support, he did what was in the interest of the United States. He is president of that country, and not France. He serves us, not them. He had to repaet this several times too, because Kerry talks the talk of "the global community", at the detrament of the country he wants to lead. Conservatives find this trait very strange.<br />Your analogy of seeing one movie and not the other is a very good one, Scott. It begs the question, what would Kerry's movie be like, in comparison to the movie Bush has given us so far, and his new release?<br />My opinion is, we got a
preview of the films last night. Kerry's movie promisses he will get France and Germany to take-over in Iraq. This must be one of Lucas' productions, as it's all fantasy. After all, in Bush's first film, ("War Against Terror"), he tried
desperately to get these two nations and others, to help us remove the sandman, and install a self-supporting democracy in it's place, but they FLATLY refused, didn't they?<br />I'm just curious as hell how Kerry,in his film, will get these countries to execute a 180degree change in direction, and send troops, police and money into the war-ravaged country. And why would he trust them if they did? Remember Cofi's film? "Oil for food"?<br />Kerry's "preview" did not address this, nor does it appear he has that part werked-out on the story-board yet.<br />As far as the debate went, Kerry talked GW Bush under the table! He is truely a silver-tongued empty suit. Bush was clearly angry in places, in-articulate (as you pointed-out), but he was honest and direct. It's just a shame, that even tho he repeated stuff over and over, some people still didn't
hear him. And that allways frustrates me, too, and I repeat myself. So Bush and I share this "fault".