Re: How much fiberglass and resin
I fully understand that cloth, biaxial, roving,etc. all produce a laminate that is stronger than CSM. I am actually not a complete greenhorn when it comes to composite layup, nor am I an idiot when it comes to structures since I am an aeronautical engineer and have worked on design of fighter aircraft, and have built composite parts for homebuilt airplanes. That is why I have a roll of 8 oz cloth. In those aspects, I would not even consider CSM or polyester resin because the strength to weight ratio is not there.
Having said that, my goal is not to make this boat MORE structurally sound than new, but to make it AS structurally sound as new as cheaply as possible. Seems to me that in order to accomplish this goal I would need to duplicate the materials that were used in the original construction since I'm sure the manufacturer used the cheapest way. The original was chopper gun applied fiberglass/polyester. The closest you can get to that in a hand layup is CSM using polyester resin. Saying 1708, or roving, or whatever is better, stronger, faster is very true and I don't argue that. What I question is if it is needed since the cost is obviously much higher for the materials (remember, as strong, as cheaply as possible). Unless I am totally missing something then I don't see that it is needed. I'm not trying to argue or be combative, just trying to understand your logic. If you are trying to take a boat and make it MORE structurally sound than original then I can see using the 1708 or roving. If only wanting to be "AS" sound as original is there a need. I don't see it.
As far as torsional rigidity, the deck/hull combo is what provides that. A boat hull without a deck or stringers is about the worst structure I can think of in terms of torsional rigidity. The deck closes off the structure making a tube of sorts. Actually in the case of my boat with 2 stringers, there are 3 connected tubes side by side. These tubes do have good torsional rigidity. The structural joint between the deck and the hull or stingers and hull will be in shear when the hull tries to twist. The joint has to be able to take this, but the joint is long and pretty much the entire length takes this load. A joint of fibers 45 degrees to the joint to connect the plywood to the hull would be best, but again, I don't see it as necessary unless you are trying to make the structure stronger than original.
Maybe I'm missing something here. If I am enlighten me, but I don't see why anything but CSM is required to duplicate the original. My feeling is that if any boat is taken care of properly it will last. I have a friend that has a Sea Ray I/O that his father bought new in the early 80's. His boat has always been stored in a garage and has always been taken care of and except for a few dock dings it looks like new and everything is as solid as the day his father bought it. A boat that is well cared for will last and a boat that is neglected will not. I believe this is true no matter how well it is constructed.