Re: Gun law debate...
I think many of you are missing the point in this whole debate.<br /><br />Someday, someone is going to get fed up with the incredible number of violent gun crimes in this country, and form a group like MADD.<br /><br />It is already clear that severe restrictions to guns will indeed achieve positive results.<br /><br />I'm sure that an argument can be made, and probably proven to boot, that probably something like 2 % of the guns are responsible for 98% of the problem, but its a distinction without a difference to someone that does not like guns to begin with.<br /><br />Say what you want, but at some point in time, with enough gun deaths, some group is going to get traction on this, just like MADD did with drunk drivers. For my money, if I were an NRA member, I'd want them spending my money trying to get control of the 2 % that cause most of the problem, and be percieved as part of the solution rather than the problem.<br /><br />That 2 % issue is a distiction without a difference to someone that does not like guns at all. If you get all the guns, you are bound to get the 2 % at issue.<br /><br />And the NRA may well have some clout politically, but with maybe 2 million members out of 150 million potential voters, it's a risky strategy to say we don't have a problem.<br /><br />I personally don't care too much. I live in one of the rural areas where there isn't much threat, and when I go to the big city, I tend to go to Toronto where there isn't much chance of being involved in some wacko wielding a concealed handgun, legal or otherwise