FORUM RULES UPDATED - The forum rules have been updated to continue to provide a friendly and safe environment for our member community. Please take a moment to review the updated rules and our terms of use and privacy policy. Click here for Forum Rules which has links to the 'terms of use' and 'privacy policy'.
In Other News . . .
You will notice a few enchancements to the forums to make your experience better. These include: Email Notifications, Thread Previews, Thread Starter Notation, and Emoji Options on the 'Like' icon. . .
Additionally, the merchant portions of the website have been updated and are now operational. . . . Check out iBoats for all your boating gear.
i don't think it was that they last longer - the design is made so that if there failure of the exhaust components, the water stays out of the exhaust port and keeps water from back-flowing into the engine. At Least for a while. By running the water through the separate ports/channels in the dry joint - you should notice an increase in engine temp due to the flow restriction before you put your engine at risk. Where as with the "wet joint" by the time you notice the issue with an increase in engine temp, it may already be too late.
So the repair/replacement time in salt water should be the same. But failure isn't as "catastrophic" as with standard manifolds and risers.