Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

rbh

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
7,939
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

Global warming is just that "Global"!

Just because you don't see it in your back yard doesn't mean its not happening, look at the big picture.
Colder winters, drier summers

California I am led to believe is in a constant state of weather flux Elninio/Laninia (SP?)
 

LippCJ7

Vice Admiral
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
5,431
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

Lipp, are you suggesting that trying to build cites and grow crops in the desert is DUMB? You may have something there...

All I know is I flew over the pictured reservoir two or three years ago and when I seen this photo I couldn't believe it was the same place.
No I don't think it is dumb, dumb doesn't have enough teeth, growing things in an area where they do not naturally grow is dumb, mother nature has been at this for a long time, maybe we should learn from her. The Imperial Valley is a huge area of excellent agricultural potential, problem is there isn't enough water, so Mother Nature doesn't grow much there naturally, go figure..

The Southern California area has out grown its natural resources(water) so they need to get it from somewhere, The Colorado River isn't the answer anymore, Tapping the ocean is the only answer that doesn't effect anyone else, it is an untapped natural resource with enormous potential, as Boathooked stated this could be the end of California as a a single state.

But if you really want to look at wasteful practices check out Las Vegas, a city that size in the middle of the desert, Yeah it is a beautiful city, they make the most of using water multiple times, no natural rivers or ground water, if Mead hadn't been built Las Vegas would never have reached the size it is.


I know it's not popular to use the words "climate change" but it's getting harder to pretend it's not real. I was kind of surprised when the US military said climate change and the loss of fresh water resources is one of it not the biggest threat to US security in the next decade.

Climate change is a reality, get over it, Mother Nature changes continuously, I do not subscribe to Man made Global Warming, I do believe we need to limit the greenhouse gasses we produce, but I also believe that Mother Nature will adapt, what we cannot do is change Mother Nature, she is simply to powerful she will do whatever she wants and wink at us in the aftermath. I do however believe we need more storage capacity, we need more lakes, store it when it comes, I have no doubt that those dry lakes in California will fill up again someday, people need to limit their use, don't like it, move.

Build a city in the desert and it will grow until it can no longer support itself, increase pricing will help, stop trying to artificially support it. Growing produce is another story, much more use of Water, meanwhile we are paying farmers in the greenbelt of our country to not grow. We as a nation need to be smarter in how we produce the products we need as a nation.

A long time ago water rights ruled our nation, to me it is no surprise that we are now back where we were 100 years ago, arguing the same points.

I always go back to this story about Mother Natures power, as most of you know I am a Wildland firefighter, we worked the Black Forest fire for 4 days, the most destructive Wildland fire in Colorado History, we had multiple heavy air tankers, the third largest helicopter deployment in US history to drop water on this fire that destroyed 500 homes and over 18,000 acres.

On the fourth day of the fire, Mother Nature came in and dropped 13 million gallons(I would love to see how they figured that out) on the fire and killed it in 2 hours.

We have to be smarter. It drives me nuts that there are so many people out there that cry foul when we want more storage capacity, and then whine that we have a water shortage, what hypocrites, you live in a desert for god sakes.
 
Last edited:

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,537
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

All I know is I flew over the pictured reservoir two or three years ago and when I seen this photo I couldn't believe it was the same place.
3 years ago we had record rains. We currently have had 2 years of low rain. Pretty normal for California to have this phenomenon. We rarely have an average rainfall season. It's normally way above or way below, hence the need for reservoirs. By the way, Folsom always looks barren like that this time of year. This year is way different of course and that's actually because of last year. It gets drained pretty good before getting filled back up with the snow melt. This year it won't though. Folsom is at 30% of capacity right now. Normally it should be at 54% for this date.

Our average rainfall is actually around 15" a year. As a comparison, Denver's is 17". Both are technically deserts I guess. We actually get plenty of rain in SoCal. He just need to capture it. The rain we got last night 1" did nothing more than prevent people from watering their lawns for a few days. Rest flowed into the ocean. We just have a water management issue.

As far as residential use of water in so cal, we probably only use less than 15% of the total California water usage. Around 50% of that is landscaping. Few years back they wanted us to cut back 20% which we did. Net affect was a couple percent of total water percentage in the state.
 
Last edited:

LippCJ7

Vice Admiral
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
5,431
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

3 years ago we had record rains. We currently have had 2 years of low rain. Pretty normal for California to have this phenomenon. We rarely have an average rainfall season. It's normally way above or way below, hence the need for reservoirs.

Our average rainfall is actually around 15" a year. As a comparison, Denver's is 17". We actually get plenty of rain in SoCal. He just need to capture it. The rain we got last night 1" did nothing more than prevent people from watering their lawns for a few days. Rest flowed into the ocean. We just have a water management issue.

I agree Bruce.
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,537
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

This is an interesting article:
Data Center: Average water usage by supplier in California - San Jose Mercury News

2 of the 3 lowest per capita water users in CA are San Diego and Los Angeles. Folsom and Sacramento that get their water from Folsom lake have 3 times the water usage per capita as the 2 largest So Cal Cities. So Cal has been pretty diligent with conservation measures. Northern California...not so much.
 

sublauxation

Lieutenant
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
1,317
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

I don't know why people get their undies bunched up over climate change. I for one am all for it. If not for global warming Minnesota would still be covered in glaciers and we certainly wouldn't have all the lakes! Now the global cooling predicted to begin in the next couple hundred years, that's depressing and that will seriously cut into our boating season at some point.
 

fishrdan

Admiral
Joined
Jan 25, 2008
Messages
6,989
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

But if you really want to look at wasteful practices check out Las Vegas, a city that size in the middle of the desert, Yeah it is a beautiful city, they make the most of using water multiple times, no natural rivers or ground water, if Mead hadn't been built Las Vegas would never have reached the size it is.

If I remember right... Nevada only gets 6% of the water from the Colorado river's lower basin, California gets about 60%, Arizona the rest.

ColoradoRiverAllocation.jpg


Not that I'm arguing your point of Vegas not being the size it is without Lake Mead, but we don't use very much compared to the other states. I think this goes back 80-90 years when the dams were being built, Colorado Rive Compact.
 
Last edited:

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,537
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

People using showers, drinking and flushing toilets is not the problem. It's irrigation. I bet the water usage per person in Vegas isn't any more than other cities assuming each person doesn't have a huge lawn at their house.
 
Last edited:

LippCJ7

Vice Admiral
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
5,431
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

If I remember right... Nevada only gets 6% of the water from the Colorado river's lower basin, California gets about 60%, Arizona the rest.

Not that I'm arguing your point of Vegas not being the size it is without Lake Mead, but we don't use very much compared to the other states. I think this goes back 80-90 years when the dams were being built, Colorado Rive Compact.

Oh I am not bagging on how much water Nevada uses, not at all, just that without Lake Mead Las Vegas probably succombs to the same fate as say the beach resorts of the Salton Sea, of course we know how Las Vegas exploded in popularity but without the Colorado River, that explosion in growth never happens.

The ten year average flow of the Colorado is down by nearly 1 million acre feet annually, California draws the most water from the lower basin states and is the only state to exceed its appropriation, when the new appropriations come out at around 6.8-6.5 million acre feet California has the most to lose, California is the elephant in the room.

Thing is if you really want to get down to it, Lake Powell is the water storage for the upper basin, Lake Mead for the lower basin, Lake Mead is in very bad shape, Las Vegas is installing another lower inlet from lake Mead so that they can draw from the lake when it drops below the existing inlets, the upper basin states have never reduced flow to the lower states and have always met the appropriations of the agreement, and yet Lake Mead continues to draw down faster then it gets filled.

The way I see it is that Lake Mead could go dry, without some serious rethinking of the way California uses its water I think its very possible, Powell on the other hand is in much better shape, the upper basin states are the producers of the water in the Colorado River, and Lake Powell is the upper basins storage.

This situation is about to get ugly, are the producers obligated to provide more water, above the appropriations of the CRC? Probably not, but Morally I would think yes, to an extent, at some point when everything else has failed you have no choice but to say no don't you? enough is enough right? California has drawn its appropriation and exceeded it from 100,000-800,000 AF annually over the last ten years Aquafornia , the water master of the Colorado is the Secretary of the Interior and so he has ultimate authority of surplus vs shortages and where they go, but think about those ramifications! Accordingly to back up Bruce a bit 86% of California's appropriation of Colorado River water goes to the Imperial Valley water district, and that means crop irrigation 3.8 million acre feet, that is 60,000 acre feet less then the entire state of Colorado gets, Colorado is the second Largest consumer via the CRC right behind California, so I guess if you want to go by Consumers of the Colorado River it would read something like

Colorado 3.86 MAF
Imperial Valley Water District 3.8 MAF
Arizona 2.8 MAF
Utah 1.7 MAF
Wyoming 1.07 MAF
New Mexico .84 MAF
California .6 MAF
Nevada .3 MAF

That is kind of staggering, keep in mind that this is not 100% of the actual used water, in other words Colorado has never used its full appropriation of the Colorado river, this site states that the Imperial Valley Water District is the largest water user on the Colorado! http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/w...-shrinks-california-uses-more-its-share-water , I think I need a break I am getting a little irritated..

Particularly galling to Mulroy was the irrigation district’s decision to send billions of gallons of river water into the Salton Sea to freshen the brackish inland lake in 2010, just as Lake Mead was nearing an all-time low.Yeah I need a break, I'm pissed now.
 
Last edited:

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,537
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

Of course stop the flow of water to the Imperial Valley and there will be a lot of states...not California...not eating!
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,537
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

Supposed to have up to 4 1/2" of rain in next 2 days. Maybe thus thread caused this!
 
Last edited:

fishrdan

Admiral
Joined
Jan 25, 2008
Messages
6,989
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

And here it comes....:cool:

YUP!!! Let's hope for lots, and lots, and lots of snow in the Sierras and Rockies! (2X as much in the Rockies to fill up Mead :D)

pac_oce_sat_600x405.jpg

(Going fishing this weekend, probably going to be a soggy doggie...)
 

sam60

Captain
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
3,189
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

(Going fishing this weekend, probably going to be a soggy doggie...)

Good luck out there and stay safe! I'm still routing for you for the record striper!
 

LippCJ7

Vice Admiral
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
5,431
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

Of course stop the flow of water to the Imperial Valley and there will be a lot of states...not California...not eating!

Sorry Bruce, I'm ticked off because I have always thought that California used so much of the River for California's needs, after researching this it is obvious that I was wrong, in fact a vast majority of California's allotment of the River is in fact used to support the country with fresh fruits and vegetables throughout the winter months, the Imperial Valley is in fact one of the most productive agricultural areas in the entire world.

This does not change my beliefs that this is the west's problem in fact it just reinforces it, I have no idea how California supports its population though, hopefully we pull out of this drought soon and the idiots in charge make more intelligent decisions to help mitigate future droughts.

I am praying for a huge amount of water in California over the next year.
 
Last edited:

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,537
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

Going back to the link I put up in post #31, many of the water districts that have the highest usage also don't have meters. In districts where they installed meters, the usage went way down. My house in Lake Tahoe does not have a meter. We just pay a flat rate. You should see how much water is used watering lawns up there! On the other hand, my GF has a house up in Big Bear Lake. Very few people have lawns and water is metered and not necessarily cheap.
 

sam60

Captain
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
3,189
Re: Ca. folks in for serious trouble???

Home rain guage (gage, gauge) shows .43 so far today just a few miles from the CA border. Another wave with lightning is rumbling to the SW now. I love it....:)
 
Top