Re: Air America, any listeners?
No,I am not able to listen. None of the local radio stations place their political idoelogies before their careers... They need to get Garrison Keeler to "contribute", lest they begone from their own woe.

<br /><br />
Originally posted by PW2:<br /> At least Bernie will take calls, and debate with those that disagree with him. <br /><br />A lot more than you can say about Rush, and all of his "Dittoheads"
<br />Incorrect.It's well-known fact that RL screens his calls, and takes
liberals, or those who oppose him ideologically
FIRST.<br />And if you had given this any forethought, you'dd probably have been able to figure this out without ever listening to his broadcasts.<br />It's one of the reasons he suceeds where others fail (and we all know who those are,don't we?).<br /><br /><br />
Originally posted by PW2:<br /><br />I like Franken, but he is not a radio personality.
<br />Personally, I think Franken makes a much better "Stuart Smalley"<br />
("he is Good Enough, he is Smart Enough, and Doggone It, People Like him!") But he is devoured by his own rage for both conservatism and America.<br />
Originally posted by PW2:<br /><br />The problem of course is that issues tend to be complex, and a complex, nuanced airing of issues does not tend to make for dynamic radio.
Incorrect again, PW...What makes you believe black ink takes a back seat to "nuanced airing of issues"? That is silly, even at first glance, (which granted, is all i gave that PC PW theory).One need only look as far as R.L. ,Sean Hannity, Mike Savage, or Luara Inraham to name a few, to illustrate with a bullet, that the
opposite is true.<br />And don't forget, some of us are "Rush24-7" subscribers who have first-hand knowledge of what we base our opinions of "what sells" on, as opposed to excusing failing ratings numbers to "nuance".