Agreeing with W

txswinner

Banned
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
2,326
Having seen the lastest end to my Gonzales sells out Bush thread, it gave me rise that perhaps something could be understood by the actions of the moderators to protect one of their brothern. Evidence clearly showed the line was crossed and all denial could not desolve the evidence.

Now I see how some can blindly support the W administration. Just ignore the facts and say the party line over and over. W told us this long ago in his remark, that his job was hard because he had to say things over and over and over.

As for the name calling, I do not care because if it is done by those that bear no respect they are without value.
 

12Footer

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
8,217
Re: Agreeing with W

It's "bretheren", not "brotheren"..And could you break that first paragraph down a bit for a dummy-lovin dummy? I have no clue what you are trying to say. Maybe i shouldn't?
And I am not blind. As a MOF, I see well enough to know what Kerry would be up to right about now, had he actually won .
Again and again, every day, I thank God.
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Agreeing with W

If you have questions, comments, complaints or suggestions about the management or moderation of the Board, contact iboats management.
 
Top