4.3 LX water in the oil...

Scott06

Admiral
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
6,424
Well I did the acetone test on the exhaust manifolds and they were okay. I'm definitely going to have to replace them at some point though as the rust is getting pretty bad. I tried to do a pressure test on the block but I couldn't get the right parts to get a good seal to pressurize it. I am pretty confident that it's fine though as, like I've said before, It's closed cooled and I had it wrapped in heat trace every winter.

Here's a shot of the Port side after the exhaust manifold was removed. #4 Cylinder is definitely wet.
View attachment 398469

This video gives a better look: VIDEO

Here's the Starboard side, and the #3 Cylinder is also wet.
View attachment 398470

Starboard side video: VIDEO

I next pulled the intake...
View attachment 398471

Here's a better video of the intake sides and valley: VIDEO

One more shot of the underside of the Intake:
View attachment 398472

And subsequent video: VIDEO

Anyway, I will be doing a leak down test in the next few days (now that the tool arrived), and then go from there. So what do you guys think? Anything obvious!
Rust in several
Exhaust ports is sign water is getting into exhaust

May be from head cracks
Or exhaust system leaks

Is there a crack in bottom of intake thermostat housing ?
 

Swedefj40

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
203
Rust in several
Exhaust ports is sign water is getting into exhaust

May be from head cracks
Or exhaust system leaks

Is there a crack in bottom of intake thermostat housing ?
I didn't notice any anything in the bottom of the thermostat housing. Are you meaning inside where the thermostat is or underneath the intake manifold?

I also noticed the area around both middle coolant runners on the underside of the intake manifold looks quite black. Is that normal?
 

Scott06

Admiral
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
6,424
I didn't notice any anything in the bottom of the thermostat housing. Are you meaning inside where the thermostat is or underneath the intake manifold?

I also noticed the area around both middle coolant runners on the underside of the intake manifold looks quite black. Is that normal?
On underside of thermostat housing /water cross over underside of intake

There are no middle coolant runners this is an exhaust crossover to heat choke stoves and intake. So you are seeing exhaust soot
 

Swedefj40

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
203
On underside of thermostat housing /water cross over underside of intake

There are no middle coolant runners this is an exhaust crossover to heat choke stoves and intake. So you are seeing exhaust soot
I'll have a look at the thermostat housing tomorrow. The previous owner had an issue with a stripped housing bolt and had the shop retap it. May be an issue there? I'm not sure that, if I have a leak there, how it would show up as a wet exhaust port?

Thanks for the clarity on the cross over runner. I guess that's why the divorced choke heater is mounted on it LOL.
 

dubs283

Vice Admiral
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
5,322
Those heads are toast. Might get lucky with a reman but based on pics it's doubtful

No clue where the water is coming from but a cracked head wouldn't surprise me along with manifold/riser issues
 

Swedefj40

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
203
I'm going to do a leak down test tomorrow and see if that'll shed some light on things.
 

Swedefj40

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
203
Updates... leakdown tests confirm the valves aren't sealing, but rings are good. Dropping off the heads at the speed shop to be fluxed and rebuilt. Hopefully back together in a few weeks.

1000021517.jpg1000021518.jpg1000021532.jpg1000021533.jpg
 

Lou C

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 10, 2002
Messages
12,650
Did this engine have those one piece batwing manifolds on them? I know you said the passed the acetone test but I wonder if they leaked when they got hot? Those manifolds were known to be troublesome, I think they were used from 96-99. There is a Merc conversion kit to change it to the normal 2 piece system & I think Barr makes an aftermarket version of the same thing.
 

Swedefj40

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
203
Did this engine have those one piece batwing manifolds on them? I know you said the passed the acetone test but I wonder if they leaked when they got hot? Those manifolds were known to be troublesome, I think they were used from 96-99. There is a Merc conversion kit to change it to the normal 2 piece system & I think Barr makes an aftermarket version of the same thing.
They're the 2 piece manifolds/elbows style exhaust.
 

Lou C

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 10, 2002
Messages
12,650
Ah yep thought it had the Merc Batwings based on the year range but someone already up dated it. Then you did say you had full closed cooling. Your heads & block look good but I guess the machine shop will tell the tale. The block deck you’ll be able to judge when you get all the gasket material off. When you pull off the head gaskets look at where the fire rings connect to the rest of the gasket material. Mine had slits in them right near a water passage. The heads had cracks in the center cyl exhaust valve seat. So replaced both.
 

Swedefj40

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
203
I'm learning as I go with regards to this engine and how to read the gaskets. That said, Cyl#'s 5 & 6 both look to me like there's rust stains on the head gaskets at the "Fire Rings"(?) I also noticed the lip at the back of the intake/block, where you apply sealant, and right around the sensor, wasn't sealed very good. It was showing rust stains on the block surface.

Anyway, before I order new head bolts, do I need TTY or TTA bolts for my engine? Seems to me that my year of engine is a transition year for GM/Mercruiser engines.
 

Lou C

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 10, 2002
Messages
12,650
Even before you get to that point...
get a thread chaser (not a tap) and clean out all the cyl head bolt threads in the block and make sure that the new bolts will fully thread all the way in. Your engine is closed cooled so they will probably be pretty clean but on a raw water cooled engine they are loaded with crud.
Now those I am guessing are the procedure if using GM or Merc gaskets, if you use other brands (like Fel Pro or other) check with them, to see if they advise the same. I used Fel Pro Marine (blue) head gaskets and they sealed well, with the new ARP head bolts I used.
 

Scott06

Admiral
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
6,424
I'm learning as I go with regards to this engine and how to read the gaskets. That said, Cyl#'s 5 & 6 both look to me like there's rust stains on the head gaskets at the "Fire Rings"(?) I also noticed the lip at the back of the intake/block, where you apply sealant, and right around the sensor, wasn't sealed very good. It was showing rust stains on the block surface.

Anyway, before I order new head bolts, do I need TTY or TTA bolts for my engine? Seems to me that my year of engine is a transition year for GM/Mercruiser engines.
Gen plus is the newer true Vortec head engines with 8 bolt intakes. Bolts are vertical two in each corner of intake
 

Lou C

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 10, 2002
Messages
12,650
Also:
On the Gen + true Vortec keep in mind that the intake manifold bolts take much lower torque than the pre Vortec, IIRC pre Vortec is like 30-35 ft lbs whereas the Vortec is like 15 ft lbs.
I think there was a mistake in the Mercruiser shop manual when the Gen + first came out that used the old torque spec but was later corrected maybe in a service bulletin….
 
Last edited:

nola mike

Vice Admiral
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
5,362
Also:
On the Gen + true Vortec keep in mind that the intake manifold bolts take much lower torque than the pre Vortec, IIRC pre Vortec is like 30-35 ft lbs whereas the Vortec is like 15 ft lbs.
I think there was a mistake in the Mercruiser shop manual when the Gen + first came out that used the old torque spec but was later corrected maybe in a service bulletin….
Yes, I snapped a bolt on the intake using the values in the manual
 

Lou C

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 10, 2002
Messages
12,650
The Vortec intake gaskets are kinda delicate too. I actually prefer the pre Vortec. Those never had intake gaskets leaking coolant into the cam valley like on many GM cars the first few years of production till they changed the gaskets and publicized the change in the torque specs
 

Swedefj40

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
203
Dropped the heads off at the speed shop. They're going to flux them and deck them and do the valves, plus a bunch of other stuff. They'll let me know if there's any issues with them.
 

Swedefj40

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
203
Dropped the heads off at the speed shop. They're going to flux them and deck them and do the valves, plus a bunch of other stuff. They'll let me know if there's any issues with them.
Heads are good, no cracks, exhaust seats are hammered though and will be replaced. I also ordered new exhaust manifolds just to be on the safe side. Old ones were pretty rusty. Should start to put things back together next week.
 

Lou C

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 10, 2002
Messages
12,650
I’d wonder why the exhaust seats were hammered?
Low octane fuel?
Lean fuel mix?
Too much spark advance?
Boat is not reaching specified max rpm with current prop?
All those should be investigated to avoid a recurrence….

BTW I know some think that 87 octane fuel is fine but my old OMC Cobra has a sticker on the flame arrestor indicating that 89 octane fuel must be used or else the timing should be retarded a few degrees. Our gas dock sells only 93!
Anyway never had pinging or detonation running on 89 or higher octane. Marine engines are highly loaded all the time…
 
Top