imported_Skippy
Seaman Apprentice
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2006
- Messages
- 40
Re: What is considered the best TCW3 oil lately?
Comment: purged for not agreeing with the Forum elders
Comment: purged for not agreeing with the Forum elders
NMMA's actual statement on it's TC-W3 licensed rating (source NMMASept. 2010 : http://www.nmma.org/certification/programs/oils/)
"The long term objectives of the two cycle engine industry have been to reduce emissions which contain burnt and unburned oil that has passed through the engine, and to develop a quality of oil that reduces the mixture ratio to fuel while extending the life of the engine. That means significantly reduced emissions to satisfy EPA requirements, less warranty problems, and increased customer satisfaction due to engines lasting longer with less maintenance and overhauls.
TC-W3? lubricant, an NMMA owned trademark, has evolved over the years through much testing and research, and has proven to be the level of quality to satisfy the above objectives. And, going a step further, now that two cycle engines have moved towards higher cylinder temperatures and compressions, this lubricant also meets the EPA emissions reductions.
TC-W3? has demonstrated the necessary lubrication performance quality needed for these more demanding cylinder/engine conditions. "
Some of you folks are reading way too much of a broad interpretation into that TC-W3 rating. It is, what it says it is. It does not say it is for every motor ever made, nor does its' own specification say it is optimum for every outboard motors operating conditions.
It "satisfy(s) the above objectives": and most critically mentioned by the NMMA source -- the emissions.
It is a licensed PASS-FAIL test. Those NMMA test criteria may, or may not, be applicable to your outboard. IF additional specifications/additives for your outboards lubrication are needed, could the engine manufacturer "possibly" have included them in their own TC-W3 rated and blended oils?
Maybe Brand-Name oils are just advertising, snake oil, mouse milk ... or maybe it cost more money to exceed a lubricant package then just surviving a basic Pass-Fail test?
You be the judge.
Those NMMA test criteria may, or may not, be applicable to your outboard. IF additional specifications/additives for your outboards lubrication are needed, could the engine manufacturer "possibly" have included them in their own TC-W3 rated and blended oils?
It "satisfy(s) the above objectives": and most critically mentioned by the NMMA source -- the emissions.
that Mercury requires use of their oil to maintain warranty. Then, in this case, Mercury MUST provide that oil FREE OF CHARGE to the consumer. This is a provision of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, Section 102(c)
The only way the manufacturer can require you to use their brand of filter, or any other part is for the manufacturer to provide the item free of charge under the terms of the warranty, and I have yet to see any of the new car manufactures doing this. This falls under the "Tie-In Sales" section of the Magnuson-Moss Act.
I love it when the internet keyboard cowboys use this type of quote to explain the Magnuson-Moss Act, but they are at a loss when they read the Mercury owners manual that says you have to use the Merc Premium or High-Performance Gear Lube in Mercury outboards. There are no substitutions listed or any equivalent products.
Evinrude and Johnson Outboards do the same. They specify only their brand of gear lubes are to be used.
How come the internet experts are not filing massive class actions against Merc and Evinrude for not providing FREE lower unit oil to everyone?
They can and always have recommended the brand name lubricants. But they cannot absolutely REQUIRE it to honor their warranty,.
It's nice that you spent all that time cutting and pasting the factorys' comments on engine oil, but you did not read my post which is about the lower unit oils where the factories do not specify any alternate lubes. Their warranty statements say that if you don't use their recommended lubricants, you could lose coverage.
According to your interpretation of the MMA, both Merc and Evinrude should be in the free lower unit oil business or face massive lawsuits.