deputydawg
Lieutenant Commander
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2004
- Messages
- 1,607
Finally the courts made a ruling that makes sense! <br />in November 2003 I executed a search warrant on the biggest dealer in my area ending a 4 year investigation. We ended up seizing several pounds of weed, the largest seizure of meth in this county, and a lot of prescription meds. <br />During the preliminary hearing to get the case sent to District Court the state lost based on lab reports not ready yet. The lab is backlogged too far. The district attorney re-filed and on the second go around the state won the preliminary hearing sending the case to district court.<br />The defense filed a suppression hearing back in October. They suggested that 1, the warrant was served with "too much force". This was based on officers entering the residence with guns drawn. At the time I knew of 4 users in the residence with history of carrying weapons and violent acts. 2, the warrant should have been a "daytime" warrant, not to be served at night. 3, the warrant should have been a "knock and announce" warrant. These are areas that have been fought hard in the courts. In the good old days we could get a warrant that did not require us to knock on the door and announce who we were, then wait for the occupants to open the door for us. Now it is very very hard to get a no knock warrant. Courts have indicated that the destruction of evidence alone is not enough to violate the rights and enter a home without announcing first who we are and what we are doing. And the final arguement was that I lied on the application for warrant.<br />Finally last week I got the answer. The judge ruled in the states favor on ALL points. Even the no knock side, we saw someone running as we approached the house and heard them yell "flush it the cops are here". At that point we broke the patio door and entered. <br />Win one for the good guys finaly! <br />Now we move on to trial, so in another about 10 months we should have the defendant on probation for a few months.