Wake Board vs Ski boat

haulnazz15

Captain
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
3,720
Re: Wake Board vs Ski boat

I have 2 concerns :

1. I've been told by some that the competition ski boats - Mastercraft, Centurian, Sanger - don't make good "family" boats...that they're a bit too specialized, with the engine in the middle, center pull for the rope, etc. Opinions, please?

2. Here in California these boats command about 50% more for a 10 year old boat than an equivilent Crownline, Reinell, Seaswirl, etc.. Worth it? Convince me, please!

Dave

It is a true statement. It's not that it won't work as a family boat, it that it's not really a "jack of all trades." The shallow deadrise angle/draft usually makes them ride pretty rough in anything but smooth water. Also, on the direct-drive style, the engine sits in the middle of the boat taking up a lot of space. Unless you ski on small lakes where chop isn't an issue, and you really want to have that perfect slalom wake, then I'd just get the regular runabout.
 

skibrain

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Messages
766
Re: Wake Board vs Ski boat

Agree. I can't speak as well to cross-over direct drives where some models have a decent trick ski or wake board wake at 18-20 mph, but for slalom it isn't until you go faster (30 mph +) and shorten up the line (22' off) that you get a small wake.

At 15' off and long line, there are some outboards and low dead rise fish and skis that I think are nicer.
 

SeanT

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jul 8, 2009
Messages
661
Re: Wake Board vs Ski boat

I'll chime in here:

1. I've been told by some that the competition ski boats - Mastercraft, Centurian, Sanger - don't make good "family" boats...that they're a bit too specialized, with the engine in the middle, center pull for the rope, etc. Opinions, please?
Whether or not those make good family boats are someone else's conclusion. At some point you need to come to your own, and you may not really be able to until you've tried one out or owned one. I happen to own a tournament ski boat and we all absolutely love it (I have three young boys). It boggles me how people think the engine in the middle is such a problem. Yes you have to walk around it, but it doesn't interfere with your upper body at all and in my opinion doesn't feel any more constrained than my 19' bow rider did. The center ski pole can in fact be in the way - if you ski a lot and needs passenger room. We happen to wakeboard, and use the tower mount for knee boarding as well, so not a concern. We tube lots too, and use the transom pull point for that.

2. Here in California these boats command about 50% more for a 10 year old boat than an equivilent Crownline, Reinell, Seaswirl, etc.. Worth it? Convince me, please!
They should cost more. Generally speaking they are high quality boats, especially Nautiques, Mastercraft (though they have low end stuff too), Supra, and MB. They also typically have larger engines, though there's plenty of V8s in the makes you mentioned as well. They also hold their value better (again in my opinion) and I think they are worth the premium. I bought mine used, the previous owner took great care of it, and I have a great boat. At the end of the day you have to consider the shape it's in and only pay what you are comfortable. But tournament boats do command a premium. They are also typically more expensive for servicing and seasonal layup. I think part of that is because of the type of boat though - there's not really any more work involved on one of those than there is a V8 runabout.

Regarding wake, Skibrain is right (and definitely knows). At low speeds most ski boats throw a relatively large wake and it only flattens out at high speeds. I know lots of slalom skiiers (like my dad and uncles) that actually prefer many outboard fishing boats for slalom over a tournament ski boat. I think that comes down to preference as well and skill level.

No-one can tell you what you should by, but I hope some of what I put helps you make your own decision.
 

SeanT

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jul 8, 2009
Messages
661
Re: Wake Board vs Ski boat

One more thing - if the direct drive "engine in the middle" really bothers you, then look at some V drive models. They solve that problem and then some.
 

Gromulin

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
230
Re: Wake Board vs Ski boat

It is a true statement. It's not that it won't work as a family boat, it that it's not really a "jack of all trades." The shallow deadrise angle/draft usually makes them ride pretty rough in anything but smooth water. Also, on the direct-drive style, the engine sits in the middle of the boat taking up a lot of space. Unless you ski on small lakes where chop isn't an issue, and you really want to have that perfect slalom wake, then I'd just get the regular runabout.

Ditto what he said. "Comp" boats are purpose-built, where sterndrives are more a jack-of-all-trades. If you just want to go tooling around on lakes/reservoirs (like Folsom), you will appreciate the flexibility of a runabout. Think about all the stuff you will be bringing along too. You'll need space to store wakeboards/tube /lunch/towels etc. I'd spend the extra for a bit larger runabout.

Which statement do you think is heard most often from new boat owners?:

"I wish I had a LARGER boat with MORE power"

or..

"I wish I has a SMALLER boat with LESS power"
:D
 
Top