FORUM RULES UPDATED - The forum rules have been updated to continue to provide a friendly and safe environment for our member community. Please take a moment to review the updated rules and our terms of use and privacy policy. Click here for Forum Rules which has links to the 'terms of use' and 'privacy policy'.
In Other News . . .
You will notice a few enchancements to the forums to make your experience better. These include: Email Notifications, Thread Previews, Thread Starter Notation, and Emoji Options on the 'Like' icon. . .
Additionally, the merchant portions of the website have been updated and are now operational. . . . Check out iBoats for all your boating gear.
Vacuum testing is seldom needed, 99.99% of the leaks can be found with using the pressure test alone.
Even with a vacuum test, you would only get 4 or 5 inches of vacuum because the input shaft seal at the ujoints is not designed to hold vacuum.
so in other words if the input shaft seal at the ujoint is not designed to hold vacumm then even if bellows are leaking water would not through the input shaft seal? or could it ?
so in other words if the input shaft seal at the ujoint is not designed to hold vacumm then even if bellows are leaking water would not through the input shaft seal? or could it ?
My understanding is that as the outdrive cools after use, it can cause enough of a vacuum that it will suck air/water from the bellows. So if the bellows is leaking water, the outdrive will suck in some of that water, even though the seal is good.