Re: Trying To Understand Texting
I hate texting. If you want me to have information, then Email me so i can easily save it and pass it on. You want to chat? Then use the stupid thing for what it was originally designed and CALL ME!
But isnt email essentially the same thing? The obvious advantage in that situation, is that, being like email, however you do not have to stop and check your email. I can send the same information in a text that gets to you immediately, whereas I have to wait til you check your email otherwise.
Prime example today. I am in a room working on a computer upgrade. The instructions state to load a certain software version. Well this unit already had that version. I tried to call but had no signal. I sent an email, but did not get a response til just now and it said to reload software no matter what. So I essentially wasted most of the day because I couldnt use texting in this instance. Had the person I was trying to reach had texting, I would have been out of here by 1pm, now it looks like I will be here til 10pm and then have to drive home 3 hours. So texting would have been a huge time saver today and I would be sitting in my pool drinking a cold one instead of sitting in a steril room waiting on software to load.
The other great thing about texting is the ease of creating a shopping list that a man can follow. My wife sends me pictures of the items I am supposed to pick up so I dont accidently buy the wrong type of cheese.
If its a quick note, and I really do not have time to talk, texting is great too. Most times I am in a crowded area, or a noisy area and cant hear the phone, but can easily send a text and get it to someone.
Texting is not for conversations for me. If I want to have a conversation, I will call. If I want to send a quick note, I will text. If I have called and cannot get ahold of someone, I will send a text that says "call me".
A replacement for a phonecall? Not really. But texting does have its place, just like email and faxes and smoke signals.