Cosmographer
Cadet
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2012
- Messages
- 12
Hi All,
On the 18 year old boat that we are considering purchasing, the surveyor found a few problems. His overall assessment of the boat was "good" to "satisfactory" but he did make the following remarks regarding the hull:
"The underwater external hull was inspected on the slipway. Anti fouling in satisfactory condition. Moisture content readings were taken over a 20 hour period using the Tramex Skipper Plus moisture content meter and found slightly reduced. Small amount of paint blisters were noted port and starboard underwater external hull below chines. One blister was burst and the blister was formed beneath the primer coating. There were no visible signs of hull deterioration. The above water external hull in white painted GRP construction and found satisfactory. Minor gelcoat cracks were noted on the starboard side near the shore connection."
How serious does this sound? As I mentioned, this an 18 year old boat, and it's been in saltwater almost the entire time.
Also, he inspected the engine, but he's not a mechanic and did not open it up for a thorough inspection. He just visually inspected the engines for oil leakage, fuel leakage, belt tension, vibration, overheating and any sort of smoke from the exhaust. And then of course, observed its performance during the sea trial. Is this sufficient or for an engine of this age (about 1400 hours on each engine) or should I shell out another $2000 USD for a Caterpillar technician to do a full commission? (Btw, they are Caterpillar 3208 diesel inboard engines of 324.51 kW, if that makes any difference)
Thanks!
On the 18 year old boat that we are considering purchasing, the surveyor found a few problems. His overall assessment of the boat was "good" to "satisfactory" but he did make the following remarks regarding the hull:
"The underwater external hull was inspected on the slipway. Anti fouling in satisfactory condition. Moisture content readings were taken over a 20 hour period using the Tramex Skipper Plus moisture content meter and found slightly reduced. Small amount of paint blisters were noted port and starboard underwater external hull below chines. One blister was burst and the blister was formed beneath the primer coating. There were no visible signs of hull deterioration. The above water external hull in white painted GRP construction and found satisfactory. Minor gelcoat cracks were noted on the starboard side near the shore connection."
How serious does this sound? As I mentioned, this an 18 year old boat, and it's been in saltwater almost the entire time.
Also, he inspected the engine, but he's not a mechanic and did not open it up for a thorough inspection. He just visually inspected the engines for oil leakage, fuel leakage, belt tension, vibration, overheating and any sort of smoke from the exhaust. And then of course, observed its performance during the sea trial. Is this sufficient or for an engine of this age (about 1400 hours on each engine) or should I shell out another $2000 USD for a Caterpillar technician to do a full commission? (Btw, they are Caterpillar 3208 diesel inboard engines of 324.51 kW, if that makes any difference)
Thanks!