Re: Spark Advance Question (Joe Reeves Method)
And the problem I have with J. Reeves's method is that It is NOT recommended by Evinrude. I have asked all the boat mechanics in my town about it and they all say it isn't the accurate way to time the engine. That the only way to get the CORRECT timing is to time at idle and 3200 rpms (for an evinrude that is) I have nothing against J. reeves, but I also did his "rectifier test" and according to him my rectifier was bad. read BOTH ways. Turns out it wasn't. Follow the evinrude manuals because they come from EVINRUDE and J. Reeves, for all you know, could be a crazy man in his basement. that's all I'm sayin'
Frankly little man, I don't give a damn if you have anything against me or not although it does appear to me and others that you have a chip on your shoulder and a rock to throw my way for some reason or another, and as for whatever problem you may encounter in the future, you can take it to the head man represented by any church in town. You may need some help figuring that out.
For the record, if a rectifier circuit (diode) shows a ohm reading in both directions, it's bad and there's no two ways about it. A variation of that test would be due to either ones failure to understand the proper function of the test equipment, a somewhat lack of reading ability, or a comprehending issue of what I explain.... issues that in over 30 plus years no one else has had a problem in understanding.
Pertaining to the minus 4 degree timing procedure I speak of, a timing procedure that can be safely accomplished on many OMC engines that DO NOT incorporate the Fast Sart feature... and some that do have the Fast Start feature if one knows exactly how to disable that feature, I would add the following.
No, you will not find that procedure in any OMC or 3rd party manual. This procedure is one that I and a few OMC Factory Reps came up with over a period of time. Rather that have it incorporated within a manual, it was rather put out in bulletim form. I could state exactly what number bulletin as I'm staring at it at the moment but I hesitate to do your legwork for you. Your sarcastic and insulting innuendos allow me to only reply in like manner. Look it up yourself.
How many truly experienced OMC mechanics do you have in your town? No, stop, don't answer that. I probably couldn't comprehend such a high figure. I would assume that your "town mechanics" would be the ones that are members of this website's forum and possibly other sites that ask questions for the more experienced members to answer... and that's fine, that what they should do and that's why we're here... to help. Our knowledge, the knowledge of many, has been accumulated over a period of many years, knowledge that will not be found in any manual, and is given freely to just about anyone that asks.
But when someone comes along that obviously has an axe to grind, any advice that I'd have to offer comes to a screeching halt. You have a hellava lot to learn little man, especially when it comes to diplomacy.
I backed out from giving advice on this site on a temporary basis as my wife is quite ill and she requires the majority of my time, and nothing further will follow this reply for obvious reasons. Also, if I am going to match wits with another, I would prefer it to be someone that is capable of fighting more than half the battle.
Now, it's unlikely that the powers that be on this site will let this reply stay visible for any great length of time, and I may even be banned for replying in the manner I've done here. That is of course their prerogative and I understand that aspect of the board.