Re: NO death toll
That's your opinion on why it was tossed around. And it smacks of a bit of paranoia.<br /><br />It could have been to prepare people for a possible worst case scenario, which, thankfully, hopefully, turned out to be an overly pessimistic estimate.<br /><br />Whose fault it is, if anyone's, is a separate issue.<br /><br />To hope that none of it falls at the feet of Bush--well, it seems to me that ship has sailed on that one since he took responsibility for any failings of the federal response in his speech last nite.<br /><br />What was more troubling to me was his implication that we may not be as prepared as we should be for future disasters--Which leads one to the question why is that, and what have we been doing the last 4 years with HSC?<br /><br />Now I don't know the answer to that, and clearly the President has the opportunity to explain what he meant, but the media has a duty, in a democracy, to hold his proverbial feet to the fire. And to do less would be malfeasance by the media, IMO<br /><br />He has the opportunity to defend his administration, and convince us that he is doing the best possible job.