New wheels and tires for my 06 GT Stang, finally :)

ezbtr

Captain
Joined
May 1, 2002
Messages
3,043
I did a thing for my 06 GT , they should be here by Thursday, anthracite, reminds me of my 68 FAST fastback I sold 23 yrs ago before son born
😉
- my GT is windveil blue
 

Attachments

  • anthwheel1.jpg
    anthwheel1.jpg
    53.9 KB · Views: 1

ezbtr

Captain
Joined
May 1, 2002
Messages
3,043
pics
 

Attachments

  • bullits1.1.jpg
    bullits1.1.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 0
  • bullits1.2.jpg
    bullits1.2.jpg
    34.9 KB · Views: 0
  • bullits1.3.jpg
    bullits1.3.jpg
    55.1 KB · Views: 0

poconojoe

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
1,966
Nice!
Back in the '60's and 70's Cragar SS and Torque Thrust D's were the bomb.

I had 10 inch reverse dish chrome Cragar SS on the rear and 7 inch on the front of my '69 Tempest. G60 biased on the rear and the front I can't remember, but they had that skinny look.
Radials were just coming on the market at the time.

My '69 Tempest was basically a GTO. I swapped out the overhead cam six for a Pontiac 428. Replaced the 3-on-the-tree with a Hurst floor shifter and an M21 4 speed out of a Camaro.

Lots of other goodies too. Edlebrock intake and carb, Hays street and strip clutch, headers, Hush Thrush mufflers to name a few.

That clutch was so strong, I broke two clutch pedals. I had to get a guy to weld a reinforcement on the pedal. The bracket that the pushrod mounted to kept sheering off.

That car was a beast!

Fun times....
 

ezbtr

Captain
Joined
May 1, 2002
Messages
3,043
Will install by this weekend, staggered 18's and sticky Sumitomos
 

Attachments

  • new1.1.jpg
    new1.1.jpg
    60.1 KB · Views: 1
  • new1.2.jpg
    new1.2.jpg
    60.2 KB · Views: 1
  • new1.3.jpg
    new1.3.jpg
    71.7 KB · Views: 1

ezbtr

Captain
Joined
May 1, 2002
Messages
3,043
Nice!
Back in the '60's and 70's Cragar SS and Torque Thrust D's were the bomb.

I had 10 inch reverse dish chrome Cragar SS on the rear and 7 inch on the front of my '69 Tempest. G60 biased on the rear and the front I can't remember, but they had that skinny look.
Radials were just coming on the market at the time.

My '69 Tempest was basically a GTO. I swapped out the overhead cam six for a Pontiac 428. Replaced the 3-on-the-tree with a Hurst floor shifter and an M21 4 speed out of a Camaro.

Lots of other goodies too. Edlebrock intake and carb, Hays street and strip clutch, headers, Hush Thrush mufflers to name a few.

That clutch was so strong, I broke two clutch pedals. I had to get a guy to weld a reinforcement on the pedal. The bracket that the pushrod mounted to kept sheering off.

That car was a beast!

Fun times....
nice! Yeah I had a 68 Stang Fastback, 60 over 289, 302 heads, RV cam, balanced/blueprinted, Holley 650 (never ran right) 3.55's C4 2400 stall, sold to friend before son was born :( , he sold it and the guy flipped it into a ditch
 

poconojoe

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
1,966
nice! Yeah I had a 68 Stang Fastback, 60 over 289, 302 heads, RV cam, balanced/blueprinted, Holley 650 (never ran right) 3.55's C4 2400 stall, sold to friend before son was born :( , he sold it and the guy flipped it into a ditch
Nice!
Later in my fifties I did up a '69 notch back mustang.
Too many goodies to list.
It was fun. Sold it, made a significant profit and moved on to the next hobby, a boat!
 

ezbtr

Captain
Joined
May 1, 2002
Messages
3,043
My buddy and his 13 yr old son came over, got er done and his son learned tons, I give him p/t work, a great kid
 

Attachments

  • done1.1.jpg
    done1.1.jpg
    59.2 KB · Views: 4
  • done1.3.jpg
    done1.3.jpg
    101.7 KB · Views: 5
  • donechris1.1.jpg
    donechris1.1.jpg
    75.1 KB · Views: 5
  • donechris1.2.jpg
    donechris1.2.jpg
    62.1 KB · Views: 5

Krazeehorse

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Jan 4, 2021
Messages
118
Originally a 351 auto. When I got the car it had a 302 which is an incorrect engine for a Mach. I wanted a 428 but too cheap to pony up for one. I SHOULD have bought a 390 or at least a 351. But instead we rebuilt the 302 and it's fairly strong. Not krazee but strong. 4 speed top leader and I'm not certain on the gear set in the differential. It runs ok. Headers so it sounds like it's mean. It's fun cruising.
 

ezbtr

Captain
Joined
May 1, 2002
Messages
3,043
Originally a 351 auto. When I got the car it had a 302 which is an incorrect engine for a Mach. I wanted a 428 but too cheap to pony up for one. I SHOULD have bought a 390 or at least a 351. But instead we rebuilt the 302 and it's fairly strong. Not krazee but strong. 4 speed top leader and I'm not certain on the gear set in the differential. It runs ok. Headers so it sounds like it's mean. It's fun cruising.
nice - I had a 60 over 289 w 302 heads , cam, C4, 3.55's that was a fun, quick cruiser too , enjoy!!! :)
 
Top