No Title
You can't go wrong with a well taken care of n/a Yamaha (VX110 or FX) or a Sea-doo (GTi or GTX) around the 2006 year range. I would also recommend a Kawasaki STX-15F. The Sea-doo's will be more comfortable and have more options. Because of that, there are more things that can potentially go wrong. Yamaha's are typically really reliable, but I find them to be a little boring in both style and their ride. The Kawasaki STX-15F was based on their race ski back in the day so it will have more of a sporty ride than the other n/a options. They go back as far as 2003 and are still making pretty much the same model today.
I disagree that there is no advantage to a supercharged ski. I have a 2006 Sea-doo RXP (modified) and the speed is addictive. The trade off is that you do have to pay more attention to it and have the supercharger maintained every 100 hours. (less if you ride more aggressively) I would suggest that if you don't want a supercharges ski to stay off of one. Once you ride one it's hard to go back.
You can't go wrong with a well taken care of n/a Yamaha (VX110 or FX) or a Sea-doo (GTi or GTX) around the 2006 year range. I would also recommend a Kawasaki STX-15F. The Sea-doo's will be more comfortable and have more options. Because of that, there are more things that can potentially go wrong. Yamaha's are typically really reliable, but I find them to be a little boring in both style and their ride. The Kawasaki STX-15F was based on their race ski back in the day so it will have more of a sporty ride than the other n/a options. They go back as far as 2003 and are still making pretty much the same model today.
I disagree that there is no advantage to a supercharged ski. I have a 2006 Sea-doo RXP (modified) and the speed is addictive. The trade off is that you do have to pay more attention to it and have the supercharger maintained every 100 hours. (less if you ride more aggressively) I would suggest that if you don't want a supercharges ski to stay off of one. Once you ride one it's hard to go back.