My "free boat" had a 165 Inline 6. The block was cracked. Removed and disassembled the engine. Most everything looked good except the block. The carburetor is a little
cruddy, but probably serviceable with a rebuild (Rochester 2GC).
I bought a 160 from a salvager that looks really good. The fuel pump has a line to the
bottom that goes to the front of the carburetor (also a Rochester 2GC, but in excellent condition). Achris says that if the diaphragm fails the carb will flood the engine and prevent fuel from getting into the oil pan. I don't quite understand...
If the line from the bottom of the fuel pump on the 160 is a safety in case of diaphragm rupture, why doesn't the 165 use one? If I use the valve cover from the 165 it doesn't have a fitting for the return line from the tee in the carburetor. Would it make sense to add a fitting to the 165 cover and use the 160 carburetor with the tee and extra line from the fuel pump? Or would it be better to use the fuel pump from the 165 without the extra line? I'm not quite understanding the situation... If the fuel pump diaphragm ruptured, wouldn't the fuel pump just stop pumping? I would like to use the 165 valve cover because it has a breather fitting that goes to the flame arrestor.
I'm getting an elbow to reconnect the cooling lines later this week. Then I just need to
install points and do a little wiring. The 160 is bolted to a pallet and I'm shooting for Sunday to try and fire it up (testing before lifting into boat).
cruddy, but probably serviceable with a rebuild (Rochester 2GC).
I bought a 160 from a salvager that looks really good. The fuel pump has a line to the
bottom that goes to the front of the carburetor (also a Rochester 2GC, but in excellent condition). Achris says that if the diaphragm fails the carb will flood the engine and prevent fuel from getting into the oil pan. I don't quite understand...
If the line from the bottom of the fuel pump on the 160 is a safety in case of diaphragm rupture, why doesn't the 165 use one? If I use the valve cover from the 165 it doesn't have a fitting for the return line from the tee in the carburetor. Would it make sense to add a fitting to the 165 cover and use the 160 carburetor with the tee and extra line from the fuel pump? Or would it be better to use the fuel pump from the 165 without the extra line? I'm not quite understanding the situation... If the fuel pump diaphragm ruptured, wouldn't the fuel pump just stop pumping? I would like to use the 165 valve cover because it has a breather fitting that goes to the flame arrestor.
I'm getting an elbow to reconnect the cooling lines later this week. Then I just need to
install points and do a little wiring. The 160 is bolted to a pallet and I'm shooting for Sunday to try and fire it up (testing before lifting into boat).