From Drudge report now, this Gore snippit:<br /><br />" I thought maybe it was an aberration when three-quarters of Americans said they believed that Saddam Hussein was responsible for attacking us on September 11, 2001. But more than four years later, between a third and a half still believe Saddam was personally responsible for planning and supporting the attack."<br /><br />Basically we can all agree that society off center, but are his statistics exaggerations of the gross kind? I thought what we thought was that Saddam supported terrorists, was a bad guy, would likely team up with them against us, had met with alqeda operatives, had a terrorist training plane in Iraq, had a drone aircraft program, and certainly could have been in cahoots but we certainly didn't have enough info to prove that. To say what he said above proves he's part of the problem not the solution(to quote a left wing expression) <br /><br />Set me straight plywoody. Is it us or Gore? He seems totally nuts to me. THIS IS NOT A TROLL. Gore's statement bothered me as an unbelievable distortion of fact and I think it should by all rights be discussed. If true, than Jay Leno has it right with his on the street interviews.
