Re: Gimbal bearing question
I agree with you; but I think folks on here are more likely to talk you out of something because they've seen someone take a shortcut without ingenuity and ended up failing terribly; or not follow the book and ruin something. We don't know each other so therefore we don't know each others capabilities when working on our stuff. Some folks need a little reference or guidance to fix something and others need a specialist standing over them at all times - and not knowing which kind of person you're dealing with sparks some of the responses you get.
Either which way - I appreciate everyone's posts here and the time they took to post it, whatever it may say!
I agree with you; but I think folks on here are more likely to talk you out of something because they've seen someone take a shortcut without ingenuity and ended up failing terribly; or not follow the book and ruin something. We don't know each other so therefore we don't know each others capabilities when working on our stuff. Some folks need a little reference or guidance to fix something and others need a specialist standing over them at all times - and not knowing which kind of person you're dealing with sparks some of the responses you get.
Either which way - I appreciate everyone's posts here and the time they took to post it, whatever it may say!
mr88 let me be the first to agree with you and congratulate you on saying something that needed saying. EXACTLY. We are repeatedly chastised on this forum for not following the book etc on repair procedures. The fact is that there are many out there who have dared to try something a bit different than what the book says and have found success. They should be welcomed for their innovation, not denigrated.After all the book was written first, and probably never updated,wheras free thinking individuals will no matter what the endeavour continue to find better ways.The comparison to car recommended intervals was right on.