UncleWillie
Captain
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2011
- Messages
- 3,995
+1I love these discussions. :joyous: And the additive sellers hate to have their claims dashed with real facts instead of their shaky claims.
I would be more than happy to see that the "Stabilizers" did anything measurable at all. Even slightly!
I can't find a single experiment to demonstrate anything.
Extensive research shows that the fuel industry tests motor fuel for "Gum" in a device they most appropriately call a "Bomb".
They partially fill a heavy container with the gasoline under test and and then purge and fill the remaining space with pure Oxygen pressurized to 100psi.
The container is sealed and heated to a temperature in the low 200F range for a couple of hours. (Don't try this at home!)
This simulates Months to Years of fuel aging in just a couple of hours.
The aged fuel is then pressure sprayed into a container preheated to the 300F range and the residue remaining in the container is measured as the "Gum" content.
I have found that I could crudely duplicate the deterioration by placing an open jar of fuel in the summer sun for about a week.
About half of it will evaporate, the rest will turn a noticeable Amber Color, and Fail my "Does it form a 'Head' when Shaken" Test.
This summer I prepared a jar of straight E-10, another containing Marine Stabil, and a third with 50:1 TCW-3 Marine Oil.
Each were given the "Head" test every day until they Failed.
All three failed on the same day. The Stabilized Fuel deteriorated just the same as the untreated fuel. Go Figure!
None accumulated any water from the exposure to the atmospheric water vapor.
Another experiment compared Treated fuel to Untreated fuel by adding add small, carefully measured, increments of water to each container.
All samples started to phase separate at the same concentrations. No measurable difference were found.
If anyone knows a test that will demonstrate ANY difference between treated and untreated fuel, I would love to hear about it.
Last edited: