Re: Children suffer during the War
ROLF(wait a second,I just said Roll On Le Floor)ROFL Rolmops "quackmire" . I'm gonna have to start using that. Really. It's hilarious, and I am not making fun of you if you did it inadvertently . I may agree with you on the point of the diversion of the USA in Iraq. Iran may be doing all they can to keep a lot of resources there, and it is a counter flow current. But (there it is, the inevitable but), Isee it as analogous to the ups and down of a stock's value. We are there next to Iran, we have bases, we have forces, we can strike them from Iraq. I think W took on as much as he thought we could handle at one time, and it will take us a while to gulp Iraq enemies down. It will then be "one down, 2 to go"(Iran, Korea)of the tough nuts to crack. I suspect that Syria and others will be easier to manage. Korea will be tough because the man is mad, but pressure is being brought to bear on them by the multilateral talks(aside: Consensus man Kerry wants bilateral talks w Korea) which include China so that effort is being run in parallel. Iran is the toughest because is made up of the same kinds of extreemists as Alqeda. I think that we are surrounding them (Iran) and as time goes on their power will wane while we deal with Iraq. This is a broad war and will take a while as stated in the axis of evil speech which we all(except Plywoody) thought sounded sensible in the immediate aftermath of 911. We've already modified the attitudes of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libia, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and maybe Russia. Do you think mealy mouthed Gore or Kerry could have accomplished that had it been their watch at the time of 911 by close coordination with Hans Blix, Koffi, Chirac, Schröder?? . No way Jose. This one's for you undecided Jtexas . Stay the course...W'04
ROLF(wait a second,I just said Roll On Le Floor)ROFL Rolmops "quackmire" . I'm gonna have to start using that. Really. It's hilarious, and I am not making fun of you if you did it inadvertently . I may agree with you on the point of the diversion of the USA in Iraq. Iran may be doing all they can to keep a lot of resources there, and it is a counter flow current. But (there it is, the inevitable but), Isee it as analogous to the ups and down of a stock's value. We are there next to Iran, we have bases, we have forces, we can strike them from Iraq. I think W took on as much as he thought we could handle at one time, and it will take us a while to gulp Iraq enemies down. It will then be "one down, 2 to go"(Iran, Korea)of the tough nuts to crack. I suspect that Syria and others will be easier to manage. Korea will be tough because the man is mad, but pressure is being brought to bear on them by the multilateral talks(aside: Consensus man Kerry wants bilateral talks w Korea) which include China so that effort is being run in parallel. Iran is the toughest because is made up of the same kinds of extreemists as Alqeda. I think that we are surrounding them (Iran) and as time goes on their power will wane while we deal with Iraq. This is a broad war and will take a while as stated in the axis of evil speech which we all(except Plywoody) thought sounded sensible in the immediate aftermath of 911. We've already modified the attitudes of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libia, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and maybe Russia. Do you think mealy mouthed Gore or Kerry could have accomplished that had it been their watch at the time of 911 by close coordination with Hans Blix, Koffi, Chirac, Schröder?? . No way Jose. This one's for you undecided Jtexas . Stay the course...W'04