v1_0
Chief Petty Officer
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2007
- Messages
- 575
So I've been doing some research into this CARS thing that the government has going on.
I supose that it is well intentioned, but I've heard that dealers are starting to pull out of it - the rules change frequently... PLUS the dealership has to front the money and wait for the government to reimburse them - sounds like it's none too quick and the dealers end up with cashflow issues...
But that's just a heads up, not what I want to discuss.
What I find interesting is the information on "http://www.fueleconomy.gov/". The advanced search is very interesting.
For example, if I happened to have a 2003 Dodge Grand Caravan with the 3.8L engine, this is rated at 19 MPG "combined" (16 city, 23 hwy). A modern day (2010)Dodge Grand Caravan, with the 3.8L engine, is rated exactly the same (19 combined, 16 city, 23 hwy).
Why hasn't this improved over the last 6 years?
Ok, if that isn't enough: A 1993 Chevy Caprice Station wagon, with a 5.7 L V8 engine, is rated at 17 MPG combined (15 city, 23 hwy)...
That's 16 years - with a much larger engine - and only 2 MPG difference? (Really, just 1 mpg city...)
I dunno, I would think that the MPG would go up more...
I supose that it is well intentioned, but I've heard that dealers are starting to pull out of it - the rules change frequently... PLUS the dealership has to front the money and wait for the government to reimburse them - sounds like it's none too quick and the dealers end up with cashflow issues...
But that's just a heads up, not what I want to discuss.
What I find interesting is the information on "http://www.fueleconomy.gov/". The advanced search is very interesting.
For example, if I happened to have a 2003 Dodge Grand Caravan with the 3.8L engine, this is rated at 19 MPG "combined" (16 city, 23 hwy). A modern day (2010)Dodge Grand Caravan, with the 3.8L engine, is rated exactly the same (19 combined, 16 city, 23 hwy).
Why hasn't this improved over the last 6 years?
Ok, if that isn't enough: A 1993 Chevy Caprice Station wagon, with a 5.7 L V8 engine, is rated at 17 MPG combined (15 city, 23 hwy)...
That's 16 years - with a much larger engine - and only 2 MPG difference? (Really, just 1 mpg city...)
I dunno, I would think that the MPG would go up more...