He did it but he didn't do it.Originally posted by Dave Abrahamson:<br /> Now he's up against a wrongful death suit filed by the vivtim's family. I guess that's why it's "not guilty" not "innocent".
I think that should qualify as double indemnity. I don't understand how you can be not guilty in a criminal trial then get nailed for the same thing in a civil trial.<br /><br />On another subject, I am surprised that Scott Peterson got the death penalty with nothing but circumstantial evidence and no witnesses.Originally posted by Dave Abrahamson:<br /> Now he's up against a wrongful death suit filed by the vivtim's family. I guess that's why it's "not guilty" not "innocent".
Awesome point NYM -- I never thought of that! lolOriginally posted by NYMINUTE:<br /> Guilty Until Proven Broke. "Robert Blake"<br />Was getting rid of her worth $10,000,000.00?<br />Surely she would have walked for $3,000,000.00.
yep! The justice system is definitely catered to those who can afford to pay, unless there is enough of public opinion against the accused, and that my friends is where the media outlets muddy the waters, therefore the losers in all of this "circuslike" display will continue to be the actual victims,their families and of course the taxpayersOriginally posted by Bondo:<br /> Ayuh,.........<br /><br />Bob Blake's Story doesn't hold any water to Me......<br /><br />The way I see it, OJ,+ Blake Bought their Freedom.................<br /><br />Blake's only comment after the "Show" was that he Spent 10 Million Dollar$........ And, Now He's Broke,+ needs a Job...........<br /><br />Ayuh,....... If you want to Kill someone,.. Do it in S. Cal.,+ You'll Walk..... If you can Afford it................