A Gathering Storm for the Media

Ralph 123

Captain
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
3,983
A Gathering Storm for the Media <br />Carolina Journal <br /><br />September 06, 2005 <br /><br />RALEIGH — There is a fetid stink in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, and it’s not coming just from the fouled waters flooding New Orleans. It also wafts from the putrid reporting of the disaster by the mainstream media. <br /><br />From the moment Katrina made landfall the media focused on anything that could redound to the detriment of President Bush or inflame race and class tensions. Reporters and commentators ignored the dismal performance of New Orleans’ Democratic mayor and Louisiana’s Democratic governor, blaming every problem that arose on the Bush administration. <br /><br />Racial demagogues accused Bush and his administration of reacting slowly because most of the victims were black. Environmental activists said Bush’s refusal to sign the Kyoto Treaty caused Katrina’s severity. Democratic operatives said the administration’s decision to cut funding for a long-term study of flood control caused the levees to breach. <br /><br />All of this is stuff and nonsense. The tragedy is that the media know it too, but they still printed it. <br /><br />The media know that the first response to natural disasters is always from the local and state governments. They’ve covered enough hurricanes to understand that. They know, or should know, that the response from the federal government, especially the Federal Emergency Management Agency, is always in the second phase of recovery, not the first. They know, or should know, that a state’s National Guard is commanded by the governor, not the president. They know, or should know, that active-duty U.S. military personnel cannot act as law enforcement. But none of this was reported. <br /><br />As for a president’s role, it has traditionally been in declaring disaster areas so that the victims can get grants and low-interest loans to rebuild, and ordering FEMA into the area. His role also traditionally includes a visit to the stricken area. That’s pretty much it, unless you’re George W. Bush; then that’s not enough. Not reported was that it was Bush himself who, before the storm hit, pleaded with New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin and Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco to order a mandatory evacuation. <br /><br />The misreporting of the tragedy, and the false impression it has left with some, is even being used now for other political advantage. On Sunday, NBC’s Matt Lauer interviewed “Meet the Press” anchor Tim Russert about Bush’s Supreme Court appointments. Russert said “there was a perception created of incompetence, some even said callousness and he needs to replace it with compassion” by appointing a moderate, a liberal or even a minority to the high court. <br /><br />At least Russert was correct on one point. There was a “perception created.” The incessant drone of the media story line that Bush was to blame is what created that impression, and one that is entirely false. As with the run-up to the military operation in Afghanistan and Iraq, the media display a convenient amnesia about what they wrote in the past. <br /><br />The story line today is that things were self-evidently so catastrophic as Katrina made landfall that everyone knew that drastic measures were called for. But was that the case? Here’s what The News & Observer of Raleigh’s public editor, Ted Vaden, wrote on Sunday: <br /><br />“The N&O, like many other papers, was slow to wake up to the dimensions of the crisis but gradually ramped up the coverage in terms of space and reporters committed to the story,” he wrote. “The media were fooled the first day of the hurricane, when Katrina didn’t make a direct hit on New Orleans as expected. ‘I think that everybody got a head fake from this thing,’ said Dan Barkin, deputy managing editor. ‘I think we were kind of lulled.’” <br /><br />Vaden pointed out that “the follow-up coverage on Wednesday likewise was restrained.” This candid assessment pretty much reflects the way most of the media covered the storm at the beginning. It was only after the incompetence of the mayor of New Orleans and the state’s governor in not forcing a pre-storm evacuation that the extent of the human tragedy unfolded. But instead of reporting this truth, it became a Bush bash fest. <br /><br />And it continues. An Associated Press report from this morning was headlined: “Bush finally spending time on hurricane relief.” Finally. That’s the template word now. I saw that one coming Friday afternoon when I heard it used at least 10 times on National Public Radio to describe Bush’s actions regarding the hurricane. <br /><br />Polls show that, unlike the media, the public does not blame Bush for the hurricane, the rioting, the looting, the stranded pets, the drowning deaths or the levee breaks. That means that the public doesn’t believe what the media are reporting. That’s the real gathering storm. <br /><br />Jon Ham is vice president of the John Locke Foundation and publisher of its newspaper, Carolina Journal
 

POINTER94

Vice Admiral
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Messages
5,031
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

Ralph,<br /><br />Once and for all. There is no liberal bias in todays media. Don't you get it. Bush stole the election, he lies lies lies, in fact Bush isn't even human, he's from another planet. And its a planet run by big oil, and they are all buddies.<br /><br />And you know what else, he is a bigot, and a racist, and a homophobe, and an anti-semite, and a murderer, and he can control the weather, and he kicks puppies, and wants the elderly on the street, and he is intentionally holding the poor in squaller, and everyone who dies in this weather event he created, is because he wants them to die, and he wants everyone to have guns because guns kill.<br /><br />Just a list of this weeks accusations. Liberals are sick. And if you keep introducing facts, and fail to rely simply on emotion, you will never get it. Get back to your rich mahogony cabin, and spill some chardonny.
 

PW2

Commander
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
2,719
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

And so let me see now. We pay all these billions and billions of dollars to homeland security why again? So they can sit back and wait until they are formally invited in to the party. At the whim of some local yokul mayor?<br /><br />I always thought homeland security (of which FEMA is part) was supposed to react to emergencies, and help the homeland thru them.<br /><br />Had I'd known they needed the permission of the New Orleans mayor to act, why that changes everything.<br /><br />I feel lots safer now, and feel the billions are being well spent, assuming I never live in an area where there is ever an emergency.
 

Ralph 123

Captain
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
3,983
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

Nope - that's not the way it works nor has it ever worked that way here in the United States due to our fedralist system. <br /><br />Craig Martelle: FEMA is not a first responder<br /><br />Pittsburgh Post Gazette<br />Tuesday, September 06, 2005<br /><br />Don't be so quick to pillory the federal response in New Orleans. Immediate emergency management is primarily a local and state responsibility<br /><br />As one who has received training by FEMA in emergency management and also training by the Department of Defense in consequence management, I believe that the federal response in New Orleans needs clarification. <br /><br />The key to emergency management starts at the local level and expands to the state level. Emergency planning generally does not include any federal guarantees, as there can only be limited ones from the federal level for any local plan. FEMA provides free training, education, assistance and respond in case of an emergency, but the local and state officials run their own emergency management program.<br /><br />Prior development of an emergency plan, addressing all foreseeable contingencies, is the absolute requirement of the local government --and then they share that plan with the state emergency managers to ensure that the state authorities can provide necessary assets not available at the local level. Additionally, good planning will include applicable elements of the federal government (those located in the local area). These processes are well established, but are contingent upon the personal drive of both hired and elected officials at the local level.<br /><br />I've reviewed the New Orleans emergency management plan. Here is an important section in the first paragraph.<br /><br />"We coordinate all city departments and allied state and federal agencies which respond to citywide disasters and emergencies through the development and constant updating of an integrated multi-hazard plan. All requests for federal disaster assistance and federal funding subsequent to disaster declarations are also made through this office. Our authority is defined by the Louisiana Emergency Assistance and Disaster Act of 1993, Chapter 6 Section 709, Paragraph B, 'Each parish shall maintain a Disaster Agency which, except as otherwise provided under this act, has jurisdiction over and serves the entire parish.' "<br /><br />Check the plan -- the "we" in this case is the office of the mayor, Ray Nagin who was very quick and vocal about blaming everyone but his own office. A telling picture, at left, taken by The Associated Press on Sept. 1 and widely circulated on the Internet shows a school bus park, apparently filled to capacity with buses, under about four feet of water. If a mandatory evacuation was ordered, why weren't all the taxpayer-purchased buses used in the effort?<br /><br />Who could have predicted the anarchy resulting as a consequence? The individuals who devolved into lawless animals embarrass the entirety of America. (I worked in a U.S. Embassy overseas for a couple years and I can imagine what foreign diplomats are thinking.) What societal factors would ever lead people to believe that this behavior was even remotely acceptable? <br /><br />The folks in New Orleans who are perpetrating the violence and lawlessness are not that way because of low income or of race, but because they personally do not have any honor or commitment to higher ideals. The civil-rights leaders should be ashamed at playing the blame game. <br /><br />The blame is on the individuals. The blame is on the society that allowed these individuals to develop the ideal that the individual is greater than the national pride he is destroying. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was very clear in her comments that she was offended at those who suggested the suffering in New Orleans was prolonged because of race.<br /><br />As a retired Marine, I hang my head in shame to see my fellow Americans degenerate so far. I spent so many years in the Corps helping the citizens of other countries rise to a higher level of personal responsibility to ensure that in case of emergency, anarchy did not necessarily follow. When people are held to a higher standard of personal responsibility and they accept that, then they will do the right thing when the time comes.<br /><br />It seems that the mayor of New Orleans is leading the effort in not taking responsibility for his actions. The emergency managers for the state of Louisiana do not have much to say either. The failure in the first 48 hours to provide direction for survivors is theirs to live with. When FEMA was able to take over, it started out behind and had to develop its plan on the fly. Now the federal government has established priorities -- rescue the stranded, evacuate the city, flow in resources and fix the levee. It appears that now there is a plan and it is being systematically executed.<br /><br />Hurricane Katrina was a national tragedy -- not just in the number of lives lost or the amount of physical damage, but also in the failure of people to do what is right when no one is looking.<br /><br />Craig Martelle, retired as a major in the U.S. Marine Corps, lives in North Huntingdon. He recently launched the Strategic Outlook Institute, a public-policy organization<br /><br /> http://www.postgazette.com/pg/pp/05249/566101.stm
 
D

DJ

Guest
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

PW2 wrote:<br /><br />
And so let me see now. We pay all these billions and billions of dollars to homeland security why again? So they can sit back and wait until they are formally invited in to the party. At the whim of some local yokul mayor?<br /><br />I always thought homeland security (of which FEMA is part) was supposed to react to emergencies, and help the homeland thru them.<br />
Homeland Security has been a bit busy making sure we didn't have another 9/11. They've done a good job of it too.<br /><br />It seems that GWB had to call the Gov. of Louisiana to get her off of her duff. Even that didn't work.<br /><br />The Fed's cannot just "show up". They have to be INVITED.
 

chugger

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Jul 5, 2005
Messages
81
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

Originally posted by Ralph:<br /> A Gathering Storm for the Media <br />Carolina Journal <br /><br />September 06, 2005 <br /><br /><br />Polls show that, unlike the media, the public does not blame Bush for the hurricane, the rioting, the looting, the stranded pets, the drowning deaths or the levee breaks. That means that the public doesn’t believe what the media are reporting. That’s the real gathering storm. <br /><br />
That's why you don't need to fear the "liberal media" as much as you do. Most people are smart enough to sift through the information and arrive at their own conclusion. They don't let either Dan Rather or Rush Limbaugh tell them what to think.
 

alden135

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
1,770
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

Originally posted by DJ:<br /><br />
The Fed's cannot just "show up". They have to be INVITED. [/QB][/quote]<br /><br /><br />DJ,<br /><br />Please stop polluting the issue with true facts and references to established law. ;)
 

dakk1

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Apr 22, 2003
Messages
418
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

The days when the mainstream media said it, and Americans believed it, have long since come and gone. <br /><br />Dave..
 

POINTER94

Vice Admiral
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Messages
5,031
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

Bush called Blanco on Saturday and erged her to inplement an evacuation. She did nothing for 24hr. Blanco didn't ask Bush for federal help until Wednesday. Leadership crisis.<br /><br />Blanco had 5800 troops to secure a city of 1.4 million. Obviously knows nothing about her state, crowd control, disaster management, emergency government, or leadership. Her Leadership was to hire an outside consultant in an attempt to cover her butt and blame the feds. That is the difference between a politican and a leader. Once the storm hit it was too late. She was unable to communicate with the mayor of NO at almost any level. She hesitiates, the mayor hesitates, she hesistates to invite the feds in, and its Bush's fault.<br /><br />There are socialists who think that the government can do anything. There are those of us who understand and appreciate what states rights mean. <br /><br />Liberals are neat. Facts, laws, chain of responsiblity, mean nothing when emotions and politics are easier to introduce to manipulate.
 
D

DJ

Guest
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

Bush Scatollogy(B.S.)
Yadda, yadda, yadda.<br /><br />It's so old and tired. GET ANOTHER PLAYBOOK.
 

PW2

Commander
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
2,719
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

So let me understand this? Homeland security is too busy protecting us from terrorist attacks that they did not have time for simple natural disasters? Did they tell FEMA of their priorities?<br /><br />We have natural disasters on a reasonably regular basis, and we have had one terrorist attack that required any sort of a national response. <br /><br />And there is no doubt there was flaws in the response of the Lousiana politicians. After all, they are simply beaucrats, and don't have specialized training in crisis management.<br /><br />Which is of course why we need people involved that are in fact trained--oh wait, but they have to wait to be asked first...<br /><br />And of course, I am sure the same can be said for the authorities in Mississippi and Alabama, as FEMA was also slow to react there as well. Or did the NO mayor lead their response as well.<br /><br />Your argument is ludicrous on its face, of course. The reason we instituted a homeland security department post 9/11 is to specifically help avoid communications difficulties like this. And we seem to have added one more layer of beauracracy and compounded the problem, while costing us billions more.<br /><br />And even if you are correct, and this is how it is supposed to work, then it is a designed disaster that needs to be fixed immediately
 
D

DJ

Guest
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

PW2 wrote:<br /><br />
So let me understand this? Homeland security is too busy protecting us from terrorist attacks that they did not have time for simple natural disasters? Did they tell FEMA of their priorities?<br /><br />We have natural disasters on a reasonably regular basis, and we have had one terrorist attack that required any sort of a national response. <br />
You are CORRECT!. Give the man a prize! Like I said, they've been BUSY. Not a BAD thing, in my book.<br /><br />
And there is no doubt there was flaws in the response of the Lousiana politicians. After all, they are simply beaucrats, and don't have specialized training in crisis management.<br />
No flaws in LA politics? Now there is an UNDERSTATEMENT. Ya think? Been there/lived there. It's crooked/broken/criminal.<br /><br />
Your argument is ludicrous on its face, of course. The reason we instituted a homeland security department post 9/11 is to specifically help avoid communications difficulties like this. And we seem to have added one more layer of beauracracy and compounded the problem, while costing us billions more.<br />
Louisiana is a political state, within itself. Not unlike the UP of MI.<br /><br />Face it, the locals (City/State) failed. Come on, the Pres. had to call the Gov. and ASK her to respond. Even at that, she FAILED. When the Fed's WERE called, they came in glorious force. But, the states have to ask. That's a GOOD rule, in my book. <br /><br />I'm not a "federal" lover. But, they can deliver, when asked. FEMA and the military are NOT "first responders", by their charter. Look it up.<br /><br />BTW, many have said we're over taxed with Iraq and all. BS.<br /><br />We have two million in military service. 70K in Louisiana now. More available, to the tune of over 250K.<br /><br />Get over it. You might just be WRONG.<br /><br />Look at this way, PW2, you and I will (probably) never agree on politics. However, your HATRED for me, and my liking, is DISTURBING.<br /><br />If you want to talk about boats/motors/trailers, I'll bet we can agree. :)
 

Ralph 123

Captain
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
3,983
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

Why can't you acknowledge the fact that FEMA IS NOT A FIRST RESPONDER. Never have been and never will be. That is the job of the local and State governments with their infrastructure and troops (National Guard). Read all the posts where all sides acknowledge the plain and simple facts about where responsibilities lie. FEMA is a support agency - all state and local governments KNOW not to expect ANY HELP from FEMA for a minimum of 72 hours and that is baked into all their plans. When have you ever seen FEMA be the first responders? - the concept on it's face in a nation of 300,000,000 people is ludicrous and shows a complete lack of understanding of how this country is organized and run which totally convinces me once and for all you must be Canadian because you are way too smart to not know it otherwise.<br /><br />Under our constitution it is ILLEGAL for the Feds to do anything in a State w/o the Governors permission. By law Federal troops can't be used in a state for any law enforcement duties w/o the President declaring an insurrection (a rebellion) which he could not do. He asked Blanco for permission to federalize the effort and use troops and She asked for 24 hours to decide and then REFUSED!!!!! The Mayor slammed her for it.<br /><br />The US Military are not first responders. Never have been. That's the Guards job. In this case, according to Rummy, the were leaning so far forward they did things without permission (broke the law) which is why they were able to respond as quickly as they did. The US Military DOES NOT report to FEMA. FEMA has no authority over the US Military.<br /><br />fed·er·al·ism n. <br /><br />A system of government in which power is divided between a central authority and constituent political units. <br /><br />federation<br /><br />n 1: an organization formed by merging several groups or parties 2: a union of political organizations [syn: confederation, confederacy] 3: the act of constituting a political unity out of a number of separate states or colonies or provinces so that each member retains the management of its internal affairs<br /><br /><br />Have you been following the Iraqi constitutional debate? It's over this concept - Federalism. The Kurds and Shiites want autonomy (Federalism) and the Sunnis want 1 central government.
 

KaGee

Admiral
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
7,069
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

PW2 and his friends would be having a hissy fit if Bush would have charged in, claiming he did so unconstitutionally.<br /><br />There is no pleasing this bunch. It's partisan politics as usual.
 

demsvmejm

Master Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jul 4, 2004
Messages
831
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

The whole liberal media v baby bush seems like "Me thinks the pot is calling the kettle black." In this one specific case bush may be acting appropriately, but then again, nothing is what he does best. To be fair, I will accept that the disaster management is local, state then federal. Shame on the mayor and governor for their incompetence. But, and this came from teh "liberal media," FEMA refused to send in equipment until they knew "exactly where the trailers are going to be positioned." And like the one women recorded complained about when she calle or asked for help, she was refused assistance in person, instead the assistance or checks would be sent to her address, she replied tha ther homw was gone, DUH! And then she was told, the post office would hold her mail. Her replay was they don't have a post office. Doesn't sound like federal emergency management to me. Sounds like a case of I have a secure home to go to, and a government paycheck in thebank, so I don't have to help you, just hide behind "regulations." This is NOT bush's fault on it's face. But the right wing group will do anything to demonize the "liberal media," and the hysteria created by Katrina has given the media a lot to assimilate and report. So any errors or faults on the medias part is being attacked by the right wing damage control. So even though bush is a poor example of a president and gives the "liberal media" lots of faux pas and other point sof interest to report and slam him for, this is not. At least from what I have heard and read, Bush has responded as a president should. And yes it is me David L. Moore, standing up(kinda) for baby bush.<br /><br />Let us all pray for the victims, our troops overseas and at home, bush, and the liberal media. Maybe with our prayers, the latter two will get it together and start serving US like they should!
 

Ralph 123

Captain
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
3,983
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

All the more reason David to not be investing the feds with more responsibilities and power. It is a big bureaucracy with rules and regulations and typical idiotic government bureaucrats running it. You want to rely in these people to save your life? We have have words made up to describe these big bureaucracies like "Catch-22," "SNAFU", and FUBAR. You can't fix these organizations for the most part. All you can do is split them up, deregulate them and empower the local leaders.<br /><br /><br />That's why the whole Homeland Security reorg was in large part, a bad idea and an emotional trap the Republicans fell into Post 911.
 
D

DJ

Guest
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

DLM, Wrote:<br /><br /><br />
And like the one women recorded complained about when she calle or asked for help, she was refused assistance in person, instead the assistance or checks would be sent to her address, she replied tha ther homw was gone, DUH! And then she was told, the post office would hold her mail. Her replay was they don't have a post office. Doesn't sound like federal emergency management to me. Sounds like a case of I have a secure home to go to, and a government paycheck in thebank, so I don't have to help you, just hide behind "regulations." This is NOT bush's fault on it's face.
That "mentality" is PRECISELY the problem.<br /><br />The Fed., "ain't your daddy".
 

jtexas

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
8,646
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

David, be fair...you cite one instance of a call to a low-level beaurocrat who gives the stock answers...FEMA knew they wouldn't have mailboxes or post offices which is why they distributed debit cards to evacuees where they could find them. Have they worked out distribution to others who left in their own autos? I don't know maybe not yet, but that's not a good example for judging FEMA. End of the day it's just a government agency, but that's what it must be, and it's a pretty darn good one, IMHO.<br /><br />DJ, with respect, DHS has a whole agency devoted to emergency management, FEMA; had they started it from scratch with resources diverted from anti-terrorism I could understand your statement that they didn't have time for Katrina, but I do not believe that anti-terrorism duties conflict with FEMA unless maybe if its a terrorist-caused emergency.<br /><br />It's a big operation there'll be a lot about FEMA to find fault with if that's your goal.<br /><br />Somebody help me out here, who has read all these news reports, I'll re-read 'em if I have to, but I don't recall seeing where Blanco quoted as having asked the Feds for something & didn't get it? I've seen Landrieu, Nagin, Broussard, other democrats, plenty of editorials and a few "news" reports that did, but I got the feeling that Blanco knows who is really at fault.
 

TELMANMN

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
465
Re: A Gathering Storm for the Media

any one who says liberal on this issue, I say BS. Bush Scattolagy.
 
Top